Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

Any updates in 4G in Anthony, New Mexico? Is between El Paso and Las Cruces. In Sprint website I just see an update for speed,

Nothing yet, but updates are starting up pretty good now as you can on sensorly maps around cruces and ep.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting 4G LTE in clovis. Getting over 20mbps

I almost drove down there on Saturday to check it out. But I was too busy. Thanks for reporting! :tu:

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its nuts that of all the places Clovis got it before Albuquerque or Santa Fe.

It's all about the backhaul. In Clovis, the backhaul is probably by Plateau. In ABQ and Santa Fe it is CenturyLink. They cannot even manage to get out of their own way.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know right it is funny that we got it before the bigger towns

If you get a chance, run the mapping feature using the Sensorly app to plot the coverage around Clovis. Thanks!

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you get a chance, run the mapping feature using the Sensorly app to plot the coverage around Clovis. Thanks!

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

Quoted to get your attention.

Commnet?

http://db.tt/DckiT5L2

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quoted to get your attention.

Commnet?

http://db.tt/DckiT5L2

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

Looks like Commnet is selling their PCS spectrum in Rural Nevada to Sprint.  As someone who sees themselves as a Nevadan, this is very good news. Sprint is sorely lacking in these areas.  I wouldn't mind of Sprint just bought out Commnet.  I roam on Commnet a lot here in Northern NM.  Their 1x network is very tired.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scratch that.  I misread that entirely.  Sprint is transferring PCS licenses to Commnet.  I found it online, and it is new:  http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applMain.jsp?applID=7656399

 

Since Sprint roams on Commnet CDMA, I hope there is a condition to at least require Commnet to add EVDO and Sprint supports EVDO roaming.  *sigh*

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes me wonder if Sprint just never plans to serve these areas.  Or if they feel just SMR+PCS G Block+EBS/BRS is sufficient.  As they now would no longer have any PCS A-F blocks in these areas.  I guess PCS voice/EVDO isn't really ever needed if they do ever expand their network in these areas.

 

Robert

 

EDIT:  It also turns out that Commnet was already leasing this spectrum from Sprint, so there is no net change here really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quoted to get your attention.

Commnet?

http://db.tt/DckiT5L2

Scratch that.  I misread that entirely.  Sprint is transferring PCS licenses to Commnet.  I found it online, and it is new:  http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applMain.jsp?applID=7656399

 

Guys, I would not give this transaction with Commnet too much thought.  It is just a partition and disaggregation.  Sprint is assigning only 10 MHz while still retaining 20 MHz of its PCS A block 30 MHz licenses for itself.  Sprint has done this time and again (e.g. Nex-Tech, Pioneer, etc.).

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, I would not give this transaction with Commnet too much thought. It is just a partition and disaggregation. Sprint is assigning only 10 MHz while still retaining 20 MHz of its PCS A block 30 MHz licenses for itself. Sprint has done this time and again (e.g. Nex-Tech, Pioneer, etc.).

 

AJ

I refuse to be calm and level headed about this! This could be the end if sprintbank!

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First 800MHz site live in New Mexico. Came over the north hill in Santa Fe and picked up the site at the Walmart in Española a good 15-20 miles away.

 

I had to go to a meeting in Los Alamos tonight. Otherwise I would have went to the site and checked it out. I wonder if LTE is live there too. I will check it later tonight.

 

uploadfromtaptalk1377559217758.jpg

 

uploadfromtaptalk1377559246925.jpg

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First 800MHz site live in New Mexico. Came over the north hill in Santa Fe and picked up the site at the Walmart in Española a good 15-20 miles away.

 

I had to go to a meeting in Los Alamos tonight. Otherwise I would have went to the site and checked it out. I wonder if LTE is live there too. I will check it later tonight.

 

attachicon.gifuploadfromtaptalk1377559217758.jpg

 

attachicon.gifuploadfromtaptalk1377559246925.jpg

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Awesome news!  The big question is, does it allow a phone call?  We are in day 4 of our 800SMR sites not allowing any inbound/outbound calls.  They've launched 2 more as well and have the same exact problem.  These Ericsson guys and leaving sites messed up is growing old, donut LTE sites, and now dead 800SMR sites.  At least we were able to get Sprint to acknowledge the issue today.  Imagine a site covering the city with at least 6+ miles of coverage blocking all voice calls!  

 

Any who....  I found a pattern in basestation IDs on our 800SMR sites (link of explanation below).  Maybe you guys can find one too?

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/579-network-vision-site-map-new-orleans-memphis-gulf-coast-east-texas-mississippi-and-louisiana-markets/page-218?p=193878&do=findComment&comment=193878

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome news! The big question is, does it allow a phone call? We are in day 4 of our 800SMR sites not allowing any inbound/outbound calls. They've launched 2 more as well and have the same exact problem. These Ericsson guys and leaving sites messed up is growing old, donut LTE sites, and now dead 800SMR sites. At least we were able to get Sprint to acknowledge the issue today. Imagine a site covering the city with at least 6+ miles of coverage blocking all voice calls!

 

Any who.... I found a pattern in basestation IDs on our 800SMR sites (link of explanation below). Maybe you guys can find one too?

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/579-network-vision-site-map-new-orleans-memphis-gulf-coast-east-texas-mississippi-and-louisiana-markets/page-218?p=193878&do=findComment&comment=193878

It pains me they may turn it off by the time I get back down to Española. I definitely will try voice, text and data on it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It pains me they may turn it off by the time I get back down to Española. I definitely will try voice, text and data on it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

If the pattern holds, you were on the beta sector of the site.

 

I found if I am worse than a -100 signal it will hand off the voice call to PCS when initiated. Anything better in signal and it just sits then call failed. When I try to call myself it just rings and rings until voice mail, it never rings the phone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First 800MHz site live in New Mexico. Came over the north hill in Santa Fe and picked up the site at the Walmart in Española a good 15-20 miles away.

 

I believe I stand vindicated in accurately describing the range of CDMA1X 800.  Thank you very much...

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was able to handoff to another sector on 800. So both the SW and ESE sectors are broadcasting. I didn't try the north sector. Neither voice calls nor texting were working on it.

 

Surprisingly, I was able to keep the signal all the way home. About 10 miles away, over two hills and passing three Sprint sites. It was -101dBm in my driveway. I thought for sure I would lose the signal going inside. But I kept it. It only dropped 2dBm indoors. It's -103dBm sitting here in my recliner in my Living Room. Just shocking. I live behind two hills. The signal must be bending over the tops... :lol:

 

uploadfromtaptalk1377580702732.jpg

 

The 800 PN numbers match the 1900 PN numbers in my market. :tu:

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...