Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - SF Bay Market


breakaes

Recommended Posts

Thanks last night I was trying to use the Cell ID against the maps but was confused why they didn't match up.

 

Yeah unfortunately, GCIs don't reliably map to Site IDs. In some markets there's a formula to get a site id from a GCI, but not here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that sucks. Anyway I'm happy that B26 has started deployment because schools about to start and coverage is beyond horrible

 

Are you talking about the east bay coverage?  Besides UC Berkeley, LTE is mostly available on most sites in the east bay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you talking about the east bay coverage? Besides UC Berkeley, LTE is mostly available on most sites in the east bay.

No I was talking about the coverage at my school is beyond horrible. Weirdly there's a tmobile site right in the middle of the campus [emoji107] and a Verizon site a block away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it that he's in Alameda. Dat site spacing. Eugh.

Yeah I'm in Alameda but live on Bayfarm and get amazing speeds on an underutilized B25 site. Most people here have Verizon/AT&T here so I get amazing speeds when I'm at home but I'd rather use my Comcast 50+ MBs wifi

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way to do it from the GCI alone. You have to do some detective work, get close to sites (~-70dm) and note down which GCI you're getting as a site note in SCP. Some markets with more members crowd source this and have extensive GCI to site mappings, but we don't really have the manpower out here. 

Is there an existing spreadsheet for any GCI mappings in this market? If so, there are a few sites I can add in Emeryville, Berkeley, and Oakland.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there an existing spreadsheet for any GCI mappings in this market? If so, there are a few sites I can add in Emeryville, Berkeley, and Oakland.

 

No but feel free to start one! We can just start with a simple Google spreadsheet, you can put a few GCI -> Site ID mappings there and we can expand from there. Add it to the Sponsor thread that dbsynergy runs, and we'll start contributing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah unfortunately, GCIs don't reliably map to Site IDs. In some markets there's a formula to get a site id from a GCI, but not here.

It's not actually a formula. Once you have collected a good number of GCIs and matched them to their sites, a pattern should develop allowing you to predict (roughly) the remaining.

 

Sent from my LG G3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not actually a formula. Once you have collected a good number of GCIs and matched them to their sites, a pattern should develop allowing you to predict (roughly) the remaining.

 

Sent from my LG G3

 

In Chicago for B41 Clear sites there is an actual formula to map GCIs to Site IDs (don't know if this is a unique to Chicagoland thing, or a unique to Clear thing, or both), it involves some simple hexadecimal math and a bit mask. tommym65 discovered it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Chicago for B41 Clear sites there is an actual formula to map GCIs to Site IDs (don't know if this is a unique to Chicagoland thing, or a unique to Clear thing, or both), it involves some simple hexadecimal math and a bit mask. tommym65 discovered it.

Ah, that. For Sprint sites anyway, no formulas needed.

 

Sent from my LG G3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm at the same spot where I found B26 the other day but I'm only connecting to B25 from the same site [emoji17]

 

Edit: Just connected to B26 from the same site and I have a hunch that it's coming from the site on Alameda hospital. But I haven't figured out that sites Cell ID and physical ID yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is the new custer launch in SF?  Are things getting better out there?  I am going to SF at the end of the month, hopefully all those cluster launched sites get LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is the new custer launch in SF?  Are things getting better out there?  I am going to SF at the end of the month, hopefully all those cluster launched sites get LTE.

 

eCSFB was a bitch when i drove by yesterday. Hopefully Ericsson gets off their butts and push the software updates quickly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is the new custer launch in SF? Are things getting better out there? I am going to SF at the end of the month, hopefully all those cluster launched sites get LTE.

Seems like everywhere I go, it's still just 3G. The density of LTE towers is low, so when I do get it, it's maybe 2Mbit with towers overloaded. We made progress, but need another 6 months of work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

eCSFB was a bitch when i drove by yesterday. Hopefully Ericsson gets off their butts and push the software updates quickly.

eCSFB was working fine this morning, but all that happened is I picked up a very distant B41 tower with slow speeds.

 

South San Jose launch is a joke. Maybe if they had B26 there, it wouldn't be as bad. I bet 3G works great there with all the phones fighting over scraps of LTE. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was in Red Hook again and I swear there are more Link5G sites as there are Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T small cells combined in the entire neighborhood. It seemed like every other street I turned down had one installed. Hopefully carriers will start hopping on them soon. Seems like a lot of effort to go through for no one to use them.  — — — — — T-Mobile converted the Sprint site on top of NYU Langone Brooklyn in Sunset Park. I first mapped one sector of it back in November 2023 but I thought it was a small cell so I never pinned it but I ran into another sector today which caught me off guard. I'm unable to find a permit for the conversion so it's definitely a surprise. There's another T-Mobile site 1 block away that T-Mobile initially installed back in 2019 so I'm kinda surprised they're keeping both considering the Sprint conversion is on a much taller building and could potentially provide much better coverage to the entire area.  — — — — — The old permit expired for this site without any work being done but a new permit was just approved a few days ago for a T-Mobile site at this address. Description mentions 3 antennas with 2 RRUs per sector. My guess is they're doing something similar to what they did at 360 Furman St in Brooklyn where they broadcast Band 2/66 and n25/41 from one antenna. It's a bit of a downgrade considering the site it's replacing was a full build with Ericsson 6449s. 
    • Still not seeing any ULS postings for pending T-Mobile UScellular merger in Dane county Wisconsin.
    • Came across another Crown Castle Solutions multi-tenant oDAS node in Brooklyn. Located at 40.7002286, -73.9612666. Nothing on T-Mobile or AT&T so I'm assuming these are all Verizon nodes that Crown Castle is anticipating another carrier will hop on down the line.
    • Same with factory unlocked
    • June security update is out (S22U TMO)
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...