Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Central and South Jersey Markets


mrradic

Recommended Posts

But there is a huge hole for lte because of the non upgraded tower i finally got good pictures 7bb5df5cb12b6a366f41a4391acccde8.jpgef9913cb453a01f3030832d5c58e7bbe.jpg3d7fa2d8b9f83cc550bfef392cae0a01.jpgdb3bac472e12ad7d525cac32467dc1e6.jpg4121e1e4f15b3f8020cb502241a6c75a.jpg

 

Sent from my LGLS740 using Tapatalk

Good GMO pics!

I'm aware but if the phone can connect to a usable LTE signal, it's gonna do it regardless of the distance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good GMO pics!

I'm aware but if the phone can connect to a usable LTE signal, it's gonna do it regardless of the distance

Does it look like this one can get upgraded to a full build...

 

Sent from my LGLS740 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it look like this one can get upgraded to a full build...

 

Sent from my LGLS740 using Tapatalk

Any GMO can get upgraded to a full build. The RRUs and base cabinets there are capable of running LTE. They need to replace the antennas, hook the RRUs up on the pole the antennas are on, and they obviously need upgraded backhaul.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any GMO can get upgraded to a full build. The RRUs and base cabinets there are capable of running LTE. They need to replace the antennas, hook the RRUs up on the pole the antennas are on, and they obviously need upgraded backhaul.

Hmm i have more pictures c5073b9462e0498cadccd569c5e361b7.jpg

 

Sent from my LGLS740 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CA is live in Camden and I am on LTE all the time speeds are above 50 Mbps, close proximity to Philly I guess and upgrades are going fast in Philly looks like for pope visit.

Sprint is still in the process of upgrading all over new Jersey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

We were down in Mt. Laurel area along Rt. 73 the other week and service was kind of disappointing. At the shopping center with the Apple Store and LL Bean you would sometimes have LTE outside but once inside you would drop down to 3G which at three bars was more or less useless. Page loads were over a minute. Tried toggling airplane mode a bunch of times but it didn't really help and just seems exhausting after awhile. Even LTE seemed sluggish. It's the same pattern as where I live. Anything built within the last 15 years will most likely have subpar coverage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were down in Mt. Laurel area along Rt. 73 the other week and service was kind of disappointing. At the shopping center with the Apple Store and LL Bean you would sometimes have LTE outside but once inside you would drop down to 3G which at three bars was more or less useless. Page loads were over a minute. Tried toggling airplane mode a bunch of times but it didn't really help and just seems exhausting after awhile. Even LTE seemed sluggish. It's the same pattern as where I live. Anything built within the last 15 years will most likely have subpar coverage.

You will also have to give them time build out and do you have a triband phone

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will also have to give them time build out and do you have a triband phone

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Yes. I have an iPhone 6 Plus. They still haven't finished Network Visoon so I'm not gonna hold my breathe for the latest build out. The Jersey markets are way behind schedule if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. I have an iPhone 6 Plus. They still haven't finished Network Visoon so I'm not gonna hold my breathe for the latest build out. The Jersey markets are way behind schedule if you ask me.

I understand that...mine goes to roaming but they haven't finished here where I live

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once the shutdown happens, what does Sprint have to do to the clear sites to get CA up and running beside upgraded backhaul??

They have to do the remaining software and hardware upgrades

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Down Wildwood this weekend and I must say the service is much improved from last year. Pretty much sat on B41 all weekend, and B26 when needed. All of the places I went to last year with bad service are great now, could use a little optimization on B26 still but it's a great experience here now.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I understand why LTE progress has stalled in South Jersey. Most of the towers that do not have LTE are GMOs. GMOs will not be upgraded until the very end. At least that is my understanding.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Now I understand why LTE progress has stalled in South Jersey. Most of the towers that do not have LTE are GMOs. GMOs will not be upgraded until the very end. At least that is my understanding.

GMOS are a pain to upgrade especially permitting and other issues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...