Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Central and South Jersey Markets


mrradic

Recommended Posts

In contrast, Southern Jersey market has had only 3 updates since March. People in Central and North Jersey markets should feel good about their markets' progress.

 

Maybe they've gotten more lately but all three markets are still at about a 70% acceptance rate for LTE. You would think it would be higher given how long it's been going on. I love seeing updates but to be honest these markets won't really improve until they get the densification program going. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they've gotten more lately but all three markets are still at about a 70% acceptance rate for LTE. You would think it would be higher given how long it's been going on. I love seeing updates but to be honest these markets won't really improve until they get the densification program going.

The acceptance rates have not been updated since March. I'm sure there is a difference now between the 3 markets since Southern Jersey has stagnated. However, a few percentage points is not a big deal.

 

You are correct that the big difference will occur when they add small cells and new towers to fill the gaps. The newer suburbs, like the one I live in, do not have adequate coverage.

 

From my experience, the densely populated areas have great LTE coverage. But the further you go out, data speeds go downhill fast. Voice is good almost everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The acceptance rates have not been updated since March. I'm sure there is a difference now between the 3 markets since Southern Jersey has stagnated. However, a few percentage points is not a big deal.

 

You are correct that the big difference will occur when they add small cells and new towers to fill the gaps. The newer suburbs, like the one I live in, do not have adequate coverage.

 

From my experience, the densely populated areas have great LTE coverage. But the further you go out, data speeds go downhill fast. Voice is good almost everywhere.

My part of town on my block where I live doesn't have adequate service period but I know it will improve its just a matter of me being patient lol...

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

South Jersey is approaching the 2 year LTE anniversary. End of August 2013 was when we first got LTE in South Jersey.

how is the deployment going there

 

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As i recall mount laurel was first site to get lte , i work around there for 3 years and was waiting with my note 2 that i just got lol , now we are on the note 5. One first map on sensorly and did most mapping in upper delware market too. No lie i though we be compltete by new 100 percent band 25 but still have legacy sote out there. Even dan hesse blames vendors , i blame lousy backhaul providers more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As i recall mount laurel was first site to get lte , i work around there for 3 years and was waiting with my note 2 that i just got lol , now we are on the note 5. One first map on senaorly and did most in upper delware market 2.

I m heading to Delaware in 2 weeks...comon sprint

 

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

South Jersey is approaching the 2 year LTE anniversary. End of August 2013 was when we first got LTE in South Jersey.

I was in Ocean City, NJ the first week of July 2013 and had no Sprint service for a few days while on vacation there. I remember roaming on Verizon, then getting Sprint service back before I left. I'm guessing that's when they were replacing the old equipment with NV stuff.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about lewes beach...do they even have lte

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

I would check out the Sensorly maps. They seem to be fairly accurate as far as LTE coverage is concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So i visit friends in princeton nj today. 4g was not great going up 295 band 26 was not great still underpower and i had toggle alot get back on lte. Now i see why sprint will not have volte anytime soon. Band 26 not even close ready for coverage .so much fone tuning needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i visit friends in princeton nj today. 4g was not great going up 295 band 26 was not great still underpower and i had toggle alot get back on lte. Now i see why sprint will not have volte anytime soon. Band 26 not even close ready for coverage .so much fone tuning needed.

In new jersey it isnt to good ...

 

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use work mountlaurel been year now since i left and almost same coverage and band 26 not that much better.its like 4g drops to 3g all over place.

Due to new jersey being anal about cell tower involvement its not surprising

 

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Due to new jersey being anal about cell tower involvement its not surprising

 

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

That's just an excuse. Sprint just hasn't bothered to expand in a lot of areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i visit friends in princeton nj today. 4g was not great going up 295 band 26 was not great still underpower and i had toggle alot get back on lte. Now i see why sprint will not have volte anytime soon. Band 26 not even close ready for coverage .so much fone tuning needed.

Sounds like my area, B26 is terrible and is just as strong as B25 it sucks.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It be good when they figure it out but how long people going wait , if people keep dropping 3g all the time then they will go somewere else. I seen when band 26 and 41 is optimized is really good , i am kind of amazed how good i get band 41 at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey guys i have a question...i pick up a really weak lte signal and then signal check pro says cdma is disabled while hooked up to that very far tower...what does that mean....

 

It be good when they figure it out but how long people going wait , if people keep dropping 3g all the time then they will go somewere else. I seen when band 26 and 41 is optimized is really good , i kind amazed how good i get band 41 at work.

 

 

Sounds like my area, B26 is terrible and is just as strong as B25 it sucks.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey guys i have a question...i pick up a really weak lte signal and then signal check pro says cdma is disabled while hooked up to that very far tower...what does that mean....

Phones generally hook into LTE and stay connected to just LTE because it's easier on the radio and easier on battery life. LTE gets a special signal that tells it to disconnect and connect to CDMA for phone calls, which is circuit switch fallback.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phones generally hook into LTE and stay connected to just LTE because it's easier on the radio and easier on battery life. LTE gets a special signal that tells it to disconnect and connect to CDMA for phone calls, which is circuit switch fallback.

But there is a huge hole for lte because of the non upgraded tower i finally got good pictures 7bb5df5cb12b6a366f41a4391acccde8.jpgef9913cb453a01f3030832d5c58e7bbe.jpg3d7fa2d8b9f83cc550bfef392cae0a01.jpgdb3bac472e12ad7d525cac32467dc1e6.jpg4121e1e4f15b3f8020cb502241a6c75a.jpg

 

Sent from my LGLS740 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...