Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Central and South Jersey Markets


mrradic

Recommended Posts

Sounds like you won't even get LTE 1900. You will have to wait for 800lte unless another tower goes up.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

And LTE 800 will not have a hugely larger coverage area than CDMA 1900. The signal will just be stronger within the coverage area. But it will be much better than LTE 1900.

 

In my testing of VZW LTE 750, the LTE signal did not extend much farther than CDMA 1900. And had nowhere near the coverage of VZW CDMA 850. But within the area covered by CDMA 1900, the LTE 750 signal strength was pretty darn good.

 

But once you traveled outside of the CDMA 1900 area and into the fringe LTE 750 area, the signal degraded quickly. If you look at a VZW coverage map, they show the areas that would essentially be out of CDMA 1900 coverage as "Extended LTE coverage". Meaning you may or may not get a signal. But if you do, it will be weak.

 

But as with every single site and sector, it will come down to how it is deployed. A boomer site with panels set with no downtilt will have LTE 800 stretch a long, long way. Especially in the plains.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And LTE 800 will not have a hugely larger coverage area than CDMA 1900. The signal will just be stronger within the coverage area. But it will be much better than LTE 1900.

 

In my testing of VZW LTE 750, the LTE signal did not extend much farther than CDMA 1900. And had nowhere near the coverage of VZW CDMA 850. But within the area covered by CDMA 1900, the LTE 750 signal strength was pretty darn good.

 

But once you traveled outside of the CDMA 1900 area and into the fringe LTE 750 area, the signal degraded quickly. If you look at a VZW coverage map, they show the areas that would essentially be out of CDMA 1900 coverage as "Extended LTE coverage". Meaning you may or may not get a signal. But if you do, it will be weak.

 

But as with every single site and sector, it will come down to how it is deployed. A boomer site with panels set with no downtilt will have LTE 800 stretch a long, long way. Especially in the plains.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

i thought it was also determined by the spectral frequency that is being used not just the air link protocal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i thought it was also determined by the spectral frequency that is being used not just the air link protocal

I don't know what you're trying to say. But I can tell you I'm not in error.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, all:

 

Been reading this thread with some interest. I'm looking at Virgin Mobile, for my iPhone. VM uses Sprint's network.

 

So am I correct in understanding that the major towns in Camden and Burlington Counties (Cherry Hill, Mt. Laurel, Evesham, etc.) are actually get 4G LTE?

 

TIA for any help.

Some parts of those towns are broadcasting LTE at the moment, it'll get better as time goes on.  You can see crowd-sourced LTE maps here:  http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4145-sprint-lte-coverage-maps-via-sensorly/

 

You can also download the Sensorly app from Apple's App Store, if that's more convenient for you.  Either method should give you a good idea of how the LTE rollout is going in your area or wherever your travels may take you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New to what, in particular?  I'm confused.

th

 

I don't know what you're trying to say. But I can tell you I'm not in error.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

i m new to some of the terms here and some of the technology my area of expertise is the spectrum used by the carriers sorry if i confused anyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

th

 

i m new to some of the terms here and some of the technology my area of expertise is the spectrum used by the carriers sorry if i confused anyone

 

I still don't know what you mean.  Are you having problems understanding what I posted above?  I can clarify if there is something that you are having issues with.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't know what you mean.  Are you having problems understanding what I posted above?  I can clarify if there is something that you are having issues with.

 

Robert

yes i am having problems understanding please clarify the entire paragraph for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes i am having problems understanding please clarify the entire paragraph for me

 

I will give you the basic synopsis:  Sprint LTE on 800MHz will be vastly superior in coverage indoors and outdoors over the existing Sprint LTE on 1900MHz.  It will even extend a little further than the existing 3G network.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will give you the basic synopsis:  Sprint LTE on 800MHz will be vastly superior in coverage indoors and outdoors over the existing Sprint LTE on 1900MHz.  It will even extend a little further than the existing 3G network.

 

Robert

sprints 1900 MHz 3g network gets one bar back here if i m lucky but i have had odd incidents where it has fluctuated between 2 annd 5 bars plus i m the coverage edge of two towers....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if I follow Robert correctly, in your situation, you should get more bars and a better connection overall once the towers by you are upgraded.

 

There's a tower by me that hasn't been upgraded yet.  I'm about 1/4 mile away from it and I'm only getting 2 to 3 bars of 3G, and sometimes it'll switch to one bar of LTE.  I've run a speedtest while it's on LTE and it's only at 2 up/1 down.

 

Does that suck?  Absolutely.  But, what can you do?  I'm personally used to how slow data on Sprint has been on 3G.  I mean, it can't get any worse.  It can only get better.  And it will.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

sprints 1900 MHz 3g network gets one bar back here if i m lucky but i have had odd incidents where it has fluctuated between 2 annd 5 bars plus i m the coverage edge of two towers....

 

Based on what you've said, if you are on the fringe of two CDMA 1900 sites now, you will likely get LTE 800, but not likely get LTE 1900 when these are deployed to your adjacent sites.  There are too many factors to say with any certainty.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on what you've said, if you are on the fringe of two CDMA 1900 sites now, you will likely get LTE 800, but not likely get LTE 1900 when these are deployed to your adjacent sites.  There are too many factors to say with any certainty.

 

Robert

yes so how are the propagation with cdma 1900 vs cdma 800

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks  to everyone who responded to my question.

 

I'm leaning towards Sprint/Virgin right now because of Virgin's price: buy the phone outright and $35 a month for 2.5 GB data (throttled after that.) If money wasn't an issue, I'd probably stick with Verizon. Their coverage really can't be beat, IMO.

 

It's just frustrating to look at the coverage map for Sprint and see that Philly is solid 4G, yet South Jersey officially isn't. I looked at a recent Sprint 4G rollout press release, and the areas/towns they were boasting about adding were these tiny litle burgs in the middle of nowhere.

Notthing against the people who live there, but it's frustrating that with all the people in South Jersey, you'd think there'd be more info as to when 4G would be here.

Oh, well. First world problem. Thanks again for the help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to help.  And bear in mind two things about the Sensorly maps for Sprint LTE:

 

1) I personally wouldn't count the parts of Philly and South Jersey where the 4G signal is one bar, it's likely where LTE hung on a little longer than it should before switching over to 3G.  Basically stating that LTE is probably unusable in that area.  However, LTE on the 800 spectrum will definitely help out with that issue.

 

2) Since it's crowd sourced, it's dependent on people mapping those areas where LTE is present.  There are some sites broadcasting LTE where people haven't mapped coverage on Sensorly.  In South Jersey, 27% of LTE sites have been accepted since around the end of August (and that's only counting information as of the end of last month, so you gotta think that percentage is a bit higher now).

 

Let's hope there isn't another polar vortex headed our way, and hopefully the LTE acceptances will continue to come at a good clip going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to help.  And bear in mind two things about the Sensorly maps for Sprint LTE:

 

1) I personally wouldn't count the parts of Philly and South Jersey where the 4G signal is one bar, it's likely where LTE hung on a little longer than it should before switching over to 3G.  Basically stating that LTE is probably unusable in that area.  However, LTE on the 800 spectrum will definitely help out with that issue.

 

2) Since it's crowd sourced, it's dependent on people mapping those areas where LTE is present.  There are some sites broadcasting LTE where people haven't mapped coverage on Sensorly.  In South Jersey, 27% of LTE sites have been accepted since around the end of August (and that's only counting information as of the end of last month, so you gotta think that percentage is a bit higher now).

 

Let's hope there isn't another polar vortex headed our way, and hopefully the LTE acceptances will continue to come at a good clip going forward.

i can recall for my area that sprint 800 voice was being deployed here but then shut off last summer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why am I lucky? Are you insinuating that the rollout out of band 25 is complete anywhere?

no i m insinuating that its basically most places besides my area that has it complete and i know it still on going the band 25 rollout plus i m on the coverage edge of two towers so i m curious of how it will perform and what not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no i m insinuating that its basically most places besides my area that has it complete and i know it still on going the band 25 rollout plus i m on the coverage edge of two towers so i m curious of how it will perform and what not

I don't know where in East Brunswick you live, but I was there a couple of days ago visiting a relative who's unfortunately in a long-term care facility off of Cranbury Road (CR 535) and that seems to be an almost dead spot (which is the complete opposite for how coverage is driving along Route 18).  Occasionally I'll get 1 or 2 bars of 3G (or it'll switch over to 1X), and sometimes it will roam onto Verizon.  I think the closest tower from that place is the one off the Turnpike, and according to the sponsor maps it's still a legacy tower.  Not sure if that's the closest tower from your place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...