Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Indianapolis Market


omega

Recommended Posts

 

I guess we're all just Sprint fanboys but what could you possibly need 50mb/s for on your phone? My home connection is 20mb and I have no use for it?

 

There is absolutely no need for it. Just saying it would be cool

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to seem ungrateful but I hope the speeds get faster then 17 MB down just saying I hope they are not completely finished in my area. My buddy gets 50MB down here on att consistently

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

The only thing that is good for is showing off. 4Mbps if more than enough for just about anything you'll do on your phone. If you're doing anything that needs more than that.... you should probably not be using your phone for it. Just sayin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The only thing that is good for is showing off. 4Mbps if more than enough for just about anything you'll do on your phone. If you're doing anything that needs more than that.... you should probably not be using your phone for it. Just sayin

 

its just sad that they are upgrading for the future and they are behind once again

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its just sad that they are upgrading for the future and they are behind once again

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Behind? The only thing they're behind on is coverage. I doubt AT&T will be able to maintain those speeds for too much longer. Sprint on the other hand, with this plan, will have plenty of room for growth, with LTE on 800, and Clear's LTE hotspots in major metros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its just sad that they are upgrading for the future and they are behind once again

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Do you know what you're talking about? All LTE performance is signal strength dependent. Even AT&T's. You only get 50Mbps on AT&T when you are on top of a LTE site with no one else on it. In the same conditions, you get 37Mbps from Sprint. And Sprint has a lot more spectrum it can get to, to keep the speeds up. AT&T does not. Sprint's network is denser, meaning that you will likely be closer to a Sprint site and there will be more square miles of peak speed locations than AT&T or VZW. With LTE, density is key.

 

AT&T only has enough 700MHz spectrum to deploy 10MHz wide channels in one third of the country. In another third, they have to deploy 5MHz channels just like Sprint and will be limited to the same 37Mbps. So don't get all worked up. Not a lot of AT&T markets will get the super dooper fast LTE (that AT&T will not sustain anyway). And the really big secret AT&T doesn't want people to know...it hold no 700Mhz LTE spectrum in a whole third of the country. At least Sprint's 5MHz channels are nationwide!!!

 

Also, Sprint will start developing TD-LTE on the Clearwire network next year and will have 60-90Mbps speeds. But max speeds are irrelevant. What matters is the average speed in the places you go. For the medium and long term...AT&T is the worst LTE carrier to be on.

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I was wondering if anyone has noticed periodic service updates that happen by themselves? I am pretty religious about profile/prl updates but over the past week I have woken up and noticed that I had several updates and was curious if anyone knows if this is related to the rollout.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone not currently in an LTE market, I have a question for those in a market being rolled out. I'm aware that in Chicago they became drop call city, in Indy did/have you experienced fluctuation in data coverage/speeds prior to any LTE development?

 

I'm just curious for any hints I should look for, as an LTE hopeful.

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone not currently in an LTE market, I have a question for those in a market being rolled out. I'm aware that in Chicago they became drop call city, in Indy did/have you experienced fluctuation in data coverage/speeds prior to any LTE development?

 

I'm just curious for any hints I should look for, as an LTE hopeful.

 

Thanks in advance!

The issue with dropped calls in Chicago was/is so far a unique case. I have not noticed any issues with the upgrades in Indy.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone not currently in an LTE market, I have a question for those in a market being rolled out. I'm aware that in Chicago they became drop call city, in Indy did/have you experienced fluctuation in data coverage/speeds prior to any LTE development?

 

I'm just curious for any hints I should look for, as an LTE hopeful.

 

Thanks in advance!

 

No dropped calls. I joticed my speed went from .2 d/l to over 1mbps just right before the lte started popping up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I had a average around 30mbps in that area. Thar was in the Camby area south westside of town.

 

Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my EVO LTE-LESS using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dropped call issue in Chicago was between legacy Motorola sites and Network Vision Samsung sites. They do not have legacy Motorola in Indianapolis. You should not experience the same issues.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dropped call issue in Chicago was between legacy Motorola sites and Network Vision Samsung sites. They do not have legacy Motorola in Indianapolis. You should not experience the same issues.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

 

Well I know u mentioned Columbus, Ohio would experience similar issues to Chicago, that's why I asked.

 

 

Sent from my EVO LTE-LESS using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I was wondering if anyone has noticed periodic service updates that happen by themselves? I am pretty religious about profile/prl updates but over the past week I have woken up and noticed that I had several updates and was curious if anyone knows if this is related to the rollout.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Bump

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what is the range of LTE tower ? I was getting 34 down at ky ave and tibbs, but go down on tibbs about 3 blocks and get .200 Kbps on 3G ,

I am getting 5-6mbps down at my work which is about 42nd street and the tower is at 16th. I beleive every 10 blocks is a mile so that is about 2.5 miles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

425758fa-8592-5d26.jpgSo far we have Carmel, Fishers, and Westfield...Not that I am rooting for the tower in my front yard or anything, but where is Noblesville

 

Yeah, and now there is at least one tower live in Lebanon. I have added info up and down I-65 through there over the last week or so on Sensorly. Here is hoping they keep going up 65 to Lafayette. I believe I am mostly on a tower that borders the interstate at my house up there.

 

Sprint is really blazing through the Indy market. I am pleasantly impressed.

 

Sent from my HTC EVO LTE.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, and now there is at least one tower live in Lebanon. I have added info up and down I-65 through there over the last week or so on Sensorly. Here is hoping they keep going up 65 to Lafayette. I believe I am mostly on a tower that borders the interstate at my house up there.

 

Sprint is really blazing through the Indy market. I am pleasantly impressed.

 

Sent from my HTC EVO LTE.

 

Hopefully they keep that trend going in all current and upcoming markets!!!

 

 

Sent from my EVO LTE-LESS using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...