Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Northern & Southern Connecticut Markets (includes all cities)


shmget

Recommended Posts

Any way to know when downtown Hartford upgrades might start and how to keep up to date? I have a good view from my office to observe.

 

We don't know a date. It should be before mid summer at the latest to start, though.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone noticed how fast the Northern market has been climbing up the percentage chart? We're already at 21% and ahead of the Southern market that started way before us. Hope this is a sign that I'll pick up a 4G signal on my Note 2 soon!

Im kind of happy southern CT is doing full build. in most markets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know a date. It should be before mid summer at the latest to start, though.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Now that most of the cold weather is gone they will be done faster. I feel bad for them climbing in cold weather. I work outside do I don't blame them for not working so fast!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any way to know when downtown Hartford upgrades might start and how to keep up to date? I have a good view from my office to observe.

On the ct site there has been no permits for Hartford yet but it doesn't mean much work could start before the website gets updated I will post when I see something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the ct site there has been no permits for Hartford yet but it doesn't mean much work could start before the website gets updated I will post when I see something

 

I think they've started downtown. My signal has gone to hell in the way people have described before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think they've started downtown. My signal has gone to hell in the way people have described before.

 

The first site was accepted in Central Hartford yesterday. So your suspicions are correct.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The first site was accepted in Central Hartford yesterday. So your suspicions are correct.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Still GMO or are these the first full builds we are seeing in this market?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still GMO or are these the first full builds we are seeing in this market?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

i think there full build there starting to add accepted permits on the CT website

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Several of those have fallen through and some are 3g only right now. Never take those as the gospel as they said Baton Rouge would have it around January which indeed 2 sites went active late January but nothing else since then.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Several of those have fallen through and some are 3g only right now. Never take those as the gospel as they said Baton Rouge would have it around January which indeed 2 sites went active late January but nothing else since then.

 

Sent from my little Note2

so sprint is pulling Verizon's term of launching. Lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The state page is lighting up with information now. I wish they listed all sites, but I see some in Enfield, East Windsor, Windsor Locks, Windsor, so hopefully they can get to work soon.

 

The updates are dated as far back as February, but haven't been on the site until recently.

 

Bring on the LTE.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If things don't look better by May 1, I might have to switch to T-Mobile. I can't live with 150 kb/s for an extended amount of time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If things don't look better by May 1, I might have to switch to T-Mobile. I can't live with 150 kb/s for an extended amount of time.

I doubt that it will. It may but I doubt it. I found out at work I get the same discount with Att and it will be actually cheaper for the 3gb plan. Im starting to question it they have lte and best coverage in my area. Im not bagging on sprint I been with them 8 years but Im away from home a lot and I need something reliable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that it will. It may but I doubt it. I found out at work I get the same discount with Att and it will be actually cheaper for the 3gb plan. Im starting to question it they have lte and best coverage in my area. Im not bagging on sprint I been with them 8 years but Im away from home a lot and I need something reliable.

 

It's not that I wouldn't be willing to come back someday, but I called and they can't even give an estimate if it'll be a a couple months or a year. I know it probably won't be a year, but still... The fact that they admitted that they don't look at the towers ahead to see what level of work they're going to have to do annoys me as someone who has studied public planning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some good news!

North Stamford and Stamford CT are getting a Network Vision tower very soon. It is being built and worked right now.

 

[Our regular 3G tower has gone completely Kaput here, it was NEVER properly fixed after Storm Sandy which took it down, apparently just a temporary fix. I had 5 bars before Sandy and only 2 after (of course I JUST got a new phone and blamed the phone). When it went completely out 2 weeks ago, I called and bitched, they opened a ticket, It was fully fixed for ONE WHOLE WEEK. And guess what 5 bars!! So I told customer service obviously it was never fully repaired after Sandy and it was NOT my phone not receiving the signal and I was not paying for 5 months of 1/5 the signal i should have had. After not backing down, I recieved a $75 credit to my account. Sprint REALLY needed to get a team out there again at some point during the 5 months and properly repair the tower. That was a big FAIL]

 

The service (3G) was down again completely (still is) as of Monday this week, about a week after the "fixed" it. I called again, got another ticket opened and they already had tickets opened due to others reports. This time the tech explained to me what they were doing and gave me the scheduled restoration times which is tonight at 11pm. Then she said, that does not include the Vision Network tower, that has a date further out. I didn't care when that date was so I didn't ask, I just wanted my signal back.

 

So I can absolutely say that they are workng right now on a tower that will serve the North Stamford area and probably others near it that serve other parts of Stamford.

 

I think they may be working on Vision sites up through Norwalk because another tech kept mentioning a ticket on a tower that served Stamford through Norwalk (there is no such 3G tower, I don't know if there is such a thing as a super Vision tower, but maybe it was one ticket for a series of towers). I will have to find out what the anticipated completion date is the next time I call Business Technical support.

 

I have no idea if these Vision sites will be deployed as 3G or 4GLTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...