Jump to content

So... Can the iPhone5 roam on Verizon's LTE?

kkstp09

By kkstp09
in Apple/iPhone/iOS

 Share

Recommended Posts

kkstp09 Member Level: iDEN *chirp*

kkstp09

Posted
Posted

Now that we know the Sprint version of the iPhone 5 will be able to go on all of the new bands including the 800 for CDMA, 1900 LTE/ CDMA, etc... However, it will also be compatible with Verizon's 700 LTE... is it likely that we can roam on their 700mHz band?

 

Note that in the Network Vision presentation slide, they do show LTE roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted
Now that we know the Sprint version of the iPhone 5 will be able to go on all of the new bands including the 800 for CDMA' date=' 1900 LTE/ CDMA, etc... However, it will also be compatible with Verizon's 700 LTE... is it likely that we can roam on their 700mHz band?

 

Note that in the Network Vision presentation slide, they do show LTE roaming.[/quote']

 

View the last page of this topic for the answer you seek. It is possible since they share the same design phone, however we don't know if Verizon would want to.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1974-the-new-iphone-5-nano-sim-card-sprint/

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted

Now that I have seen the iPhone 5 on Verizon LTE, why would you want to roam on Verizon's LTE? Their download speeds are almost 3 times slower than the upload!

Check out this video from iDB:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

I'm on Verizon LTE right now in Santa Fe. 3.6Mbps DL and 7.7Mbps UL. All with a -77dBm signal. Not impressive.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

I thought the faster uplink in the YouTube video an anomaly or error of the Ookla speed test. But Robert's results tend to corroborate. Thoughts?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dedub Member Level: 4G WiMax

dedub

Posted
Posted

I have an iphone 5, with lte turned on (it was turned on by default in the options), and there does not appear to be any vz lte roaming here in st louis.

 

Whether its capable of vz roaming, or sprint/vz will work out roaming agreements in the future, who can say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChadBroChillz Member Level: eHRPD

ChadBroChillz

Posted
Posted

Now that I have seen the iPhone 5 on Verizon LTE, why would you want to roam on Verizon's LTE? Their download speeds are almost 3 times slower than the upload!

Check out this video from iDB:

 

The video is full of lies. only sprint has bad 3g speeds. This cannot be.

 

 

Wow those speeds have slowed down A LOT. I remember when thunderbolt owners were hollering that they have 40Mbps download speeds. Those download speeds are right around what I got my ATT iPhone 4S and Tmobile Mytouch 4G/G2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted
I thought the faster uplink in the YouTube video an anomaly or error of the Ookla speed test. But Robert's results tend to corroborate. Thoughts?

 

AJ

 

I have seen it happen many times. It seems to happen in the same locations and/or in peak times. I think VZW DL is starting to fill up. That's what happens with Sprint EVDO carriers at first. DL starts slowing down but UL seems unaffected.

 

These UL speeds have seemed static since deployment. Its just the DL that seems to be dropping.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted
I have an iphone 5' date=' with lte turned on (it was turned on by default in the options), and there does not appear to be any vz lte roaming here in st louis.

 

Whether its capable of vz roaming, or sprint/vz will work out roaming agreements in the future, who can say.[/quote']

 

If Sprint and VZW come to a LTE roaming agreement, I can't see Sprint allowing it except in non coverage areas. I don't think Sprint will allow LTE roaming in markets yet to be deployed. Unless it perhaps had the same limited 300MB roaming limit.

 

I wouldn't mind LTE roaming in non Sprint areas though. Like the Dakotas, Wyoming, Montana etc.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted
How about this? With -102dBm rsrp Screenshot_2012-09-19-17-21-59_zps23d18909.png

 

Yuck! That's terrible. I wonder for being so far from a Sprint tower in Pahrump, if my LTE speeds will be that slow when they finally upgrade my area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

How about this? With -102dBm rsrp

 

If nothing else, it is very close to symmetrical. Ha.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dedub Member Level: 4G WiMax

dedub

Posted
Posted (edited)

excellent ping though

 

they must have some excellent traffic shaping going on, I would expect a heavily overloaded tower/network to show signs of higher pings than that.

Edited by dedub
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pyroscott Member Level: LTE Advanced

pyroscott

Posted
Posted
excellent ping though

 

they must have some excellent traffic shaping going on' date=' I would expect a heavily overloaded tower/network to show signs of higher pings than that.[/quote']

 

Verizon is supposedly checking the tower to figure out why it is so slow.

 

This is from a different site with a better signal

 

Screenshot_2012-09-21-16-21-52_zpsf7ef9c5d.png

Screenshot_2012-09-21-16-24-21_zpsd871bbaf.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

These UL speeds have seemed static since deployment. Its just the DL that seems to be dropping.

 

To paraphrase Chairman Mao, wireless streaming (which requires almost all downlink, no uplink bandwidth) is "the opiate of the masses."

 

AJ, the socialist ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

e2asune3.jpg

 

Here's one I just took on Verizon LTE in Santa Fe. Very significant difference between upload and download.

 

Robert on Samsung Galaxy S-III via Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted
I realize the network may have changed after the test' date=' but status bar showing wifi and roaming?[/quote']

 

Yeah. Its on my Verizon hotspot.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jroepcke51 Member Level: 4G WiMax

jroepcke51

Posted
Posted

e2asune3.jpg

 

Here's one I just took on Verizon LTE in Santa Fe. Very significant difference between upload and download.

 

Robert on Samsung Galaxy S-III via Tapatalk

I realize the network may have changed after the test, but status bar showing wifi and roaming?

Thats why I left Verizon for Sprint in ABQ. Roaming...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

evyzusah.jpg

 

I have been in Albuquerque almost all day. All my Verizon LTE speed tests have been lopsided with faster upload than download. Most have been 4-5Mbps DL. Never more than mid 7's. Weird.

 

Robert on Samsung Galaxy S-III via Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
leerage Member Level: eHRPD

leerage

Posted
Posted

excellent ping though

 

they must have some excellent traffic shaping going on, I would expect a heavily overloaded tower/network to show signs of higher pings than that.

Probably all those people who refuse to offload while at home.....

 

Boom...Ohhh nooo I didn't.... In all seriousness though, not trying to bring up that conversation again :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S4GRU
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By S4GRU · Posted

      Nissan Coupe
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • Dkoellerwx
      T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • AirlineFlyer
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By AirlineFlyer · Posted

      Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Nissan Skyline

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...