Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Cincinnati Market


ohioratrodder

Recommended Posts

i have my phone set up for automatic scanning for sensorly.com to help with the mappings in my area. (erlanger/florence) i am excited to see how sprint's 4g lte works. 

when it hits in my area... i will share screenshots.  :D

i am glad i came across this site. 

Edited by kysky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

as am i i'm on the boone county kenton county boarder and right now our 3g data is like 26kbps download and upload almost always fails wimax was 100 yards from my house when they stopped expanding it i'm very excited about LTE for sure lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By my count, the Network Vision Site Acceptance Report Updates page on this site list 7 accepted LTE towers in Cincinnati, but I only see 6 on Sensorly's coverage map. Does anybody know where the 7th tower is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sensorly is showing that I am reporting 4g at my address and while I do occasionally see eHRPD signal, I have never seen any 4G. I will say that along 747 just north of 275 and Tricounty it is ROCKIN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sensorly is showing that I am reporting 4g at my address and while I do occasionally see eHRPD signal, I have never seen any 4G. I will say that along 747 just north of 275 and Tricounty it is ROCKIN!

That's for dang sure its heavy up by there constant beautiful lte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am at Washington park in otr, just took a sensorly and a "speedtest" test. No lte, but ehrpd and 1.2 down

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

if you still have the epic 4g touch that is a wimax phone you wouldn't be able to use lte with it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone else been experiencing issues with the tower servicing the east side of Downtown Cincinnati near 5th St?  It frequently becomes completely non-functional, often for days at a time.  I am then shunted off to roaming.  If I disable roaming, I get no service.  The tower details from my engineering screen: SID: 4390, NID: 70, Base ID: 1521.  I called and reported it (again) and now it's going on and back off again.  Anyone have any experience like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a picture of what I believe is the LTE tower serving West Chester and Sharonville. Taken from 275 E

 

I'm starting to think that one isn't a Sprint tower. I was just at Dave and Buster's on Saturday which is only about a quarter mile from there, and I basically got zero reception inside. I don't get must inside Tri-County mall either, which is about the same distance in the other direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually got 4G for about 5 minutes on Monday night in Fairfield twp around 6pm. My cell signal is so bad that Sprint sent me an AirRave. I got that connected tonight and no more missed calls for now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have my phone set up for automatic scanning for sensorly.com to help with the mappings in my area. (erlanger/florence) i am excited to see how sprint's 4g lte works.

when it hits in my area... i will share screenshots. :D

i am glad i came across this site.

If your phone is set up for automatic mapping, it's going to be difficult to locate LTE. When Sensorly is running it's constantly sending/receiving data. When you're phone is in an active data session it doesn't look for LTE. It's like phone calls before call waiting was invented. Gotta hang up before you know your HS crush is calling.

 

LTE Discovery app w/upgrade fixes this issue as it Resets your connection constantly when not connected to LTE.

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By my count, the Network Vision Site Acceptance Report Updates page on this site list 7 accepted LTE towers in Cincinnati, but I only see 6 on Sensorly's coverage map. Does anybody know where the 7th tower is?

Chip in some beer money to keep the lights on in this place and you'll have direct access to the information.

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your phone is set up for automatic, it's going to be difficult to locate LTE. When Sensorly is running it's constantly sending/receiving data. When you're phone is in an active data session it doesn't look for LTE. It's like phone calls before call waiting was invented. Gotta hang up before you know your HS crush is calling.

 

LTE Discovery app w/upgrade fixes this issue as it Resets your connection constantly when not connected to LTE.

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

thanks so much for your info and taking the time to help me understand more about this.  :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks so much for your info and taking the time to help me understand more about this.  :tu:

 

You're welcome. Just trying to help.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone else been experiencing issues with the tower servicing the east side of Downtown Cincinnati near 5th St? It frequently becomes completely non-functional, often for days at a time. I am then shunted off to roaming. If I disable roaming, I get no service. The tower details from my engineering screen: SID: 4390, NID: 70, Base ID: 1521. I called and reported it (again) and now it's going on and back off again. Anyone have any experience like this?

I have been roaming quite a bit last several weeks right in the middle of downtown

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...