Jump to content

Sprint LTE August 2012 Schedule Maps


Recommended Posts

Cool. Looks like the same ones we saw in that warehouse. Did you see the panels? I was interested to see if the had the remote downtilt adjustment equipment on them.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Aren't the tilt controllers thought to be the smaller silver boxes mounted on the bottom of the panel? If so, I've seen them on most if not all of the towers around here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't the tilt controllers thought to be the smaller silver boxes mounted on the bottom of the panel? If so, I've seen them on most if not all of the towers around here.

 

Yes, the ACU's are on the bottom of the panel, usually 3 of them per panel; 1 for EV/1X PCS, 1 for 800SMR, and 1 for LTE PCS.

 

http://www.rfsworld.com/websearch/DataSheets/Default.aspx?q=ACU-A20-N

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the ACU's are on the bottom of the panel, usually 3 of them per panel; 1 for EV/1X PCS, 1 for 800SMR, and 1 for LTE PCS.

 

http://www.rfsworld....spx?q=ACU-A20-N

Yeah, I looked up the model number from the RRU picture thread and found the same thing. Perhaps they're a standard with the NV rollout? Anyone else found them in non-Ericsson markets to confirm?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I looked up the model number from the RRU picture thread and found the same thing. Perhaps they're a standard with the NV rollout? Anyone else found them in non-Ericsson markets to confirm?

 

I remember when I was looking around that 2 of the vendors were using the rfs panels. I don't remember which but one was using another panel vendor that had the same features. I am sure it is a requirement.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint told me that there is 4G LTE in NYC but is not ready yet so we won't be able to connect to it yet.

 

We have a few LTE sites complete in the NYC market shown on our NV Sites Complete map. However, complete LTE sites will likely be blocked until closer to launch.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw you post earlier about 4G LTE coming to most of Florida except for the Panhandle. Any idea when they are going to start on the Panhandle. Panama City Beach especially? Seeing as they have most of 2013 mapped out, the earliest would be 2014?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw you post earlier about 4G LTE coming to most of Florida except for the Panhandle. Any idea when they are going to start on the Panhandle. Panama City Beach especially? Seeing as they have most of 2013 mapped out' date=' the earliest would be 2014?[/quote']

 

Work will indeed begin in the Panhandle and Gulf Coast markets in 2013.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Work will indeed begin in the Panhandle and Gulf Coast markets in 2013.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

 

Good to hear. My family goes to Destin every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me apologize in advance for being lazy (not a lot of days off lately) and only skimming through the thread, so far. ^_^ I am pretty sure this must have been asked in some form already.

 

Are there maps showing both the scheduled towers and the confirmed completed towers? It might be hard/not-possible, but worth asking.

 

:rolleyes:

 

Thank you for all the info! S4G rulez!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me apologize in advance for being lazy (not a lot of days off lately) and only skimming through the thread, so far. ^_^ I am pretty sure this must have been asked in some form already.

 

Are there maps showing both the scheduled towers and the confirmed completed towers? It might be hard/not-possible, but worth asking.

 

:rolleyes:

 

Thank you for all the info! S4G rulez!!

become a sponsor or premiere sponsor......

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops, I borked. Made a small donation to help but forgot to include my username. Was just a few mins ago. email address will not match but will be seller@aza..... .com

Sorry for confusion.

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 in bethel

1 in Cheshire

1 in Easton

1 in Guilford

1 in Litchfield

2 in Monroe

1 in Newtown

2 in North Branford

1 in Oxford

1 in Plymouth

1 in Southbury

1 in Wallingford

 

 

thanks for the info — any info about Torrington or Bristol area?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

thanks for the info — any info about Torrington or Bristol area?

Not yet ct updates there tower sheet once a month last update was on the 20th. Robert and i don't know yet if these are just permits of if the towers have been done.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suprised New Haven/East Haven CT isn't on that list, considering how populated southern CT is.. i have problems connecting to 3G :( judging by that list, maybe they're doing the rich towns first. :o

Edited by scub
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suprised New Haven/East Haven CT isn't on that list' date=' considering how populated southern CT is.. i have problems connecting to 3G :( judging by that list, maybe they're doing the rich towns first. :o[/quote']

 

Sprint is not selecting preferred communities first, they are doing the sites that are ready and have the least obstacles first.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is not selecting preferred communities first, they are doing the sites that are ready and have the least obstacles first.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

 

Yeah, they just happen to be rich AND conveniently obstacle free. :-p

 

jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, they just happen to be rich AND conveniently obstacle free. :-p

 

jp

Dude that is so unfair! If you're best friend and golf buddy lived there you wouldn't care what neighborhood it was? I mean it's not like their purposely trying to cover your best friends daycare, wife's job, office, and commute route as that is just coincidence! I mean just because Dan Hesse's mother-in-law lives in Northern Jersey isn't the reason they aren't getting network vision updates till almost 2014! Stop trying to give everything a meaning!

 

 

 

:secret:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOL!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude that is so unfair! If you're best friend and golf buddy lived there you wouldn't care what neighborhood it was? I mean it's not like their purposely trying to cover your best friends daycare, wife's job, office, and commute route as that is just coincidence! I mean just because Dan Hesse's mother-in-law lives in Northern Jersey isn't the reason they aren't getting network vision updates till almost 2014! Stop trying to give everything a meaning!

 

 

 

:secret:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOL!

 

AMEN! Couldn't agree more. And I am not in the upper OR middle class financial bracket. Thanks! Now let's get on topic....

 

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is SouthWest Austin going to have LTE????!!!!! My iPhone 5 3G is super slow!! Drains my battery too and yes LTE is turned off for now but battery still drains super fast! Please let Austinites know when they can have LTE!! San Antonio Houston and Dallas have it why not Austin yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is SouthWest Austin going to have LTE????!!!!! My iPhone 5 3G is super slow!! Drains my battery too and yes LTE is turned off for now but battery still drains super fast! Please let Austinites know when they can have LTE!! San Antonio Houston and Dallas have it why not Austin yet?

 

I think you have us confused with Sprint. We are not affiliated with Sprint and if you took the time to read the content we have created, your ignorant question would be answered. Now, I suggest you quit trolling and go complain to Sprint.

 

If you want to stay here, check out the S4GRU Posting Guidelines especially this section:

Rants will not be allowed. We do not host Sprint's complaints. Complaints about Sprint should be directed to their customer service channels.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...