Jump to content

HTC EVO lte connection issues


dpullen

Recommended Posts

I contacted HTC yesterday about the phone not automatically connecting to the LTE network.

After telling that I was across the street from a known LTE tower and sat there for 10 mins and phone would not connect.

After doing the toggle it connected.

The rep told me that nothing is wrong with my phone and it is because of how the signal is transmitted from the tower. So its basically a sprint issue.I currently have 2 other lines now eligible for an upgrade but I dont think I going to use them for Evo Lte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I contacted HTC yesterday about the phone not automatically connecting to the LTE network.

After telling that I was across the street from a known LTE tower and sat there for 10 mins and phone would not connect.

After doing the toggle it connected.

The rep told me that nothing is wrong with my phone and it is because of how the signal is beign transmitted from the tower. So its basically a sprint issue.I currently have 2 other lines now eligible for an upgrade but I dont think I going to use them for Evo Lte.

 

That's ridiculous. How is Apple not thwarted by these supposed Sprint issues in the new iPhone 5? Lame, HTC. Lame.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's ridiculous. How is Apple not thwarted by these supposed Sprint issues in the new iPhone 5? Lame, HTC. Lame.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

 

Don't they have their antenna set up differently and geared to get stronger signal and the reason no split antennae for svdo?... Or somin like that

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I contacted HTC yesterday about the phone not automatically connecting to the LTE network.

After telling that I was across the street from a known LTE tower and sat there for 10 mins and phone would not connect.

After doing the toggle it connected.

The rep told me that nothing is wrong with my phone and it is because of how the signal is transmitted from the tower. So its basically a sprint issue.I currently have 2 other lines now eligible for an upgrade but I dont think I going to use them for Evo Lte.

That's ridiculous. How is Apple not thwarted by these supposed Sprint issues in the new iPhone 5? Lame, HTC. Lame.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

 

I think this is ridiculous as well but I am not AJ and you so my technical understanding of a few things are still in its infancy. With that being said, is it technically possible that how a signal is being transmitted from a tower(in this case lte) can affect one device and not others like what the htc rep allegedly said?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't they have their antenna set up differently and geared to get stronger signal and the reason no split antennae for svdo?... Or somin like that

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

The only difference is on the device side. SVDO is not an issue. The HTC works fine in 1x and EVDO mode, and handles SVDO just fine. It is only LTE that EVO has had LTE connectivity issues with.

 

Even though the HTC has multiple LTE antennas, it doesn't interact differently with the site than all the other MIMO Sprint LTE devices. Two diverse antennas on the device have two separate data sessions going on with the LTE site. If there are any flaws in that setup, it would be an HTC issue. Sprint is not doing anything unique that no other LTE MIMO carrier does.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct Sprint is just passing the buck.

 

I emailed quite a few mobile and tech news sites last week. Not sure how to make some noise enough to get them to come out and say something.

 

I keep thinking something is physically wrong but then the LTE only setting works good. But then you ask why haven't they fixed it? Samsung did on the same chipset.

 

Very very fishy...

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops... I meant HTC is passing the buck. And not going back to edit since it will spew html code all over the message and cut it at the bottom.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I contacted HTC yesterday about the phone not automatically connecting to the LTE network.

After telling that I was across the street from a known LTE tower and sat there for 10 mins and phone would not connect.

After doing the toggle it connected.

The rep told me that nothing is wrong with my phone and it is because of how the signal is transmitted from the tower.

 

Geez, what the hell do you expect? You were almost certainly talking to a phone drone, an entry level worker who knows next to nothing. I am ceaselessly amazed that people think that a call center worker has engineering knowledge or executive power.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The only difference is on the device side. SVDO is not an issue. The HTC works fine in 1x and EVDO mode, and handles SVDO just fine. It is only LTE that EVO has had LTE connectivity issues with.

 

Even though the HTC has multiple LTE antennas, it doesn't interact differently with the site than all the other MIMO Sprint LTE devices. Two diverse antennas on the device have two separate data sessions going on with the LTE site. If there are any flaws in that setup, it would be an HTC issue. Sprint is not doing anything unique that no other LTE MIMO carrier does.

 

Robert

 

 

Wasn't saying svdo was the issue. Was just tossing it out maybe its the design overall as we see apple bc of their antennae setup evidently get better call quality and signal...and was just saying svdo was one of the things they dropped bc of their setup...was not saying no svdo is reason for strong lte connection... BUT also not recalling if the cdma and lte is being done through same antennae either as I believe the lte one was totally separate which would toss my theory out the door completely anyway...

 

Everytime we talk signal all I remember is AJ's comments on the EVOs FCC docs showing it had lower numbers than desired really...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't saying svdo was the issue. Was just tossing it out maybe its the design overall as we see apple bc of their antennae setup evidently get better call quality and signal...and was just saying svdo was one of the things they dropped bc of their setup...was not saying no svdo is reason for strong lte connection... BUT also not recalling if the cdma and lte is being done through same antennae either as I believe the lte one was totally separate which would toss my theory out the door completely anyway...

 

Everytime we talk signal all I remember is AJ's comments on the EVOs FCC docs showing it had lower numbers than desired really...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

It is completely plausible that all the EVO LTE problems are related to low radio performance and not specific to any software or hardware malfunction. AJ and I were talking about it recently. The EVO LTE may just be a weak LTE RF Performer.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct Sprint is just passing the buck.

 

I emailed quite a few mobile and tech news sites last week. Not sure how to make some noise enough to get them to come out and say something.

 

I keep thinking something is physically wrong but then the LTE only setting works good. But then you ask why haven't they fixed it? Samsung did on the same chipset.

 

Very very fishy...

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

Yeah if LTE only continues to be good, then it still leaves the opportunity for HTC AND Sprint to get their ish together and code it right.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It is completely plausible that all the EVO LTE problems are related to low radio performance and not specific to any software or hardware malfunction. AJ and I were talking about it recently. The EVO LTE may just be a weak LTE RF Performer.

 

Robert

 

BUT the LTE Only setting working throws a wrinkle into that theory...lol

 

It's one of two things and right now we have theories for both. Hehe...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BUT the LTE Only setting working throws a wrinkle into that theory...lol

 

It's one of two things and right now we have theories for both. Hehe...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Yes. I even made that point. But I have quickly forgotten. :o

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Geez, what the hell do you expect? You were almost certainly talking to a phone drone, an entry level worker who knows next to nothing. I am ceaselessly amazed that people think that a call center worker has engineering knowledge or executive power.

 

AJ

 

I thought Dan answered the phone all the time...lol

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the LTE only works better for some and not so for other. The LTE only setting at times can be as flakey as the normal settings. On my phone I have failed to gain connection in the same area other phones have reported connections. The issues appears to rest in software or radio performance. I have also had the phone crash randomly in LTE only.

 

Sent from my EVO using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to try what you did. Did you have to p[ay any fees? Did you have insurance? Did they use the insurance? Was it a Sprint store. We need some more info bro.

 

I did have to pay a $35 fee since I dont have insurance. The store I went to was not a sprint cooperate store... it was a "sprint preferred retailer

 

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But does the phone work fine in LTE only mode regarding initial signal acquisition or just in maintaining a weak signal?

 

My experience is it connects and holds the signal fine at times in LTE only mode. But the phone does the same without changing the network values at times too. There are times when the connection will get to -123 before it drops over to 3g, this is with cdma/evdo/lte setting. The only reason it appears that LTE only mode works better is the phone isn't looking for any other signals. Which would make it appear that the 3g threshold is higher than it needs to be. The argument could be made that the LTE threshold is to low.

I personally have stopped using this setting since I can't use my phone for anything but internet.

 

Sent from my EVO using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Didn't happen on the Epic and doesn't happen on the S3.

 

I do notice that a lot of times the Evo will say ehrpd and the S3 will say only evdo. Not sure if the airave is causing that and it just takes a while to switch over.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

it does happen to the s3 I ha e seen it on my gf phone

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, long time listener, first time caller. I started visiting the board several months ago trying to get info on the timeline for the lte network roll out in my area, and to get some details on the apparent lte connectivity issues with the HTC Evo lte. Because I really love the build quality of the evo and hate the way the GS3 feels in the hand, I've been trying to wait on a solution to come out that resolves the Evo's issues. I really respect the knowledge and insight that is rooted in his community and I registered to ask a question. Do you guys think that a solution is possible? More importantly, do you think that Sprint and HTC are still working on a solution. I don't want to take the chance, spending that kind of money and have the phone not be able to utilize one of its biggest features, lte, with the network upgrades on the horizon in my area. Because I read all types of sites looking to see if if there is news of a remedy, I came across this:

 

http://forums.androidcentral.com/htc-evo-4g-lte/218202-4g-lte-connection-fix-sprint-phones-worked-me-least.html

 

The guy seems like he really knows what he's talking about. But, I'm not an expert, you guys are. Does this work? I hope it does, I would really like to buy this phone.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People have toyed with the scan number but it doesn't seem to make a difference. The problem is more than changing just one number, otherwise Sprint would have did that many months ago. Don't zero out your RTSP numbers either, placebo there and messes up you updating the profile/prl if you need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Killing the RTSP server will cause streaming applications not to work on your device. Sprint wont funnel data from high bandwidth consumption sites i.e. Youtube, Pandora unless the data is compressed and funneled though their proxy server.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...