Jump to content

HTC EVO lte connection issues


dpullen

Recommended Posts

What scares me is that it says the next MR which means "Maintenance Release". I would think the next update would be Jelly Bean, which wouldn't be considered an MR? I doubt we will see Jelly Bean on the EVO LTE till near or after Christmas. Anyone want to take a pool?

They considered the 2.13 OTA MR2 ....

 

http://community.spr...tart=0&tstart=0

"MR" just means maintenance release. It's a fancy word for "firmware update" or "software update". When they say, "The Next MR", they mean the next OTA.

 

That was posted before the last OTA. So it looks like Sprint and HTC think they fixed it. The denial continues......

Actually, this isn't true. If they thought it was fixed, it wouldn't say "Action: Pending MR". It would say something like "Action: Software Upgrade", or include a line like "This issue was resolved in the blah blah date blah blah version number MR". Lacking this, the issue is still open and pending.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that but the date was in August it was posted. They released an update a few weeks later that stated the LTE connectivity was fixed. I still 100% believe they think they fixed it or either something is physically wrong. Instead of taking the huge PR hit and financial hit recalling the phone it is just blamed on the network and swept under the rug.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that but the date was in August it was posted. They released an update a few weeks later that stated the LTE connectivity was fixed. I still 100% believe they think they fixed it or either something is physically wrong. Instead of taking the huge PR hit and financial hit recalling the phone it is just blamed on the network and swept under the rug.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

That information on that page that was posted was a Sprint internal document. It is in no means meant to be customer facing. S&R techs can lose their jobs for giving out, copying, etc that information. It's meant for Sprint Service Technicians only. Most store reps don't even know this tool exists, and many in Care don't know to search it (they use a different system).

 

That being said, I will tell you this: the Known Issues Tool (which that comes from) contains a ton of things like this. When they get fixed, it gets updated. If the latest MR fixed it, the document would have been updated. It was not. Instead, it remains. Thus, Sprint still absolutely considers this an unfixed "Known Issue" with the EVO 4G LTE.

 

That the update said it improved the LTE Scanning has little to do with the fact that this issue is known and not resolved.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong.. I get what you are saying but there is just too much against it.

 

I have said all along I hope I am wrong on the denial but way too many conversations with Sprint reps on the phone and person say otherwise.

 

This is the only time I have ever seen or heard one peep of them admitting of the problem.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong.. I get what you are saying but there is just too much against it.

 

I have said all along I hope I am wrong on the denial but way too many conversations with Sprint reps on the phone and person say otherwise.

 

This is the only time I have ever seen or heard one peep of them admitting of the problem.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Well, I do get what you're saying: just because they know it exists, doesn't mean it will actually be fixed.

 

However, it's awful publicity to admit a problem, especially when it's possible to fix it.

 

Let me give you an example. The HTC EVO 4G (not LTE) may or may not have had an issue with charging ports going bad. I myself have had to replace dozens of them for this issue. It happened to a lot of people who owned the phone. Some, several times over.

 

Did Sprint know this was an issue? Oh, yes. Did they take steps to try and keep it from happening? Yes, they changed a few things in their remanufacturing process. Did they replace these phones for free, even those not paying the protection plan? Absolutely.

 

Was there an announcement? Was there any public acknowledgement of this? Of course not. Nothing good comes from letting the general public know there is a problem with their devices, unless it's bad enough for a recall. Most people will assume they know everything, flip out, get angry at Sprint, get angry at the manufacturer... When the problem might not even affect a quarter of users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess we will just hope you are right since this will affect all users when NV is done.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Well at least it's still a "known issue". That counts for something I guess. Here's to hoping they can figure it out!

Like I said, just because it's a known issue, does not necessarily mean it can or will be fixed. This is especially true, seeing as the problem appears to be magnified by the fact that the EVO LTE is a poor radio performer. If they can't fix it, the best you can really hope for is a bill credit, or to get your phone swapped out to another via Service and Repair... or Craigslist.

 

I of course can't tell you about them, but there are known issues for older phones that were never resolved. They were simple hardware defects, and no amount of patching in software could fix it. So nothing happened, people upgraded, and life went on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Like I said, just because it's a known issue, does not necessarily mean it can or will be fixed. This is especially true, seeing as the problem appears to be magnified by the fact that the EVO LTE is a poor radio performer. If they can't fix it, the best you can really hope for is a bill credit, or to get your phone swapped out to another via Service and Repair... or Craigslist.

 

I of course can't tell you about them, but there are known issues for older phones that were never resolved. They were simple hardware defects, and no amount of patching in software could fix it. So nothing happened, people upgraded, and life went on.

I really think that its not the radio but the software bc its got the same radio as the s3 bc of the s4 processor so I do not believe its the radio but the software, bc I have changed the lte scan timer in ## 3282# from 30 to 5 and it has help me connect to lte faster but I will still lose it at a low signal

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the EVO LTE could keep a signal, its signal strength was roughly the same as the other LTE devices in our testing. We just had a hard time keeping a signal on the EVO when it got worse than -110dBm.

 

Robert via LG Viper with ICS using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the EVO LTE could keep a signal, its signal strength was roughly the same as the other LTE devices in our testing. We just had a hard time keeping a signal on the EVO when it got worse than -110dBm.

 

Robert via LG Viper with ICS using Forum Runner

what is -110dbm converted to rssi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

what is -110dbm converted to rssi

 

You add 25. So it would be -85dBm RSSI.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

You add 25. So it would be -85dBm RSSI.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

dang so that mean I won't be able to get 4g in my apartments if I got that phone cause I'm at -95dbm for 1x and like -80 through -88dbm inside.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

dang so that mean I won't be able to get 4g in my apartments if I got that phone cause I'm at -95dbm for 1x and like -80 through -88dbm inside.

 

The maximum threshold for usable LTE is -95dBm RSSI (-120dBm RSRP). So you may be right at the threshold. It's just that the EVO has a hard time keeping a signal worse than -110dBm. However, if you go into 1x/LTE mode, you will be able to keep the weak signal.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The maximum threshold for usable LTE is -95dBm RSSI (-120dBm RSRP). So you may be right at the threshold. It's just that the EVO has a hard time keeping a signal worse than -110dBm. However, if you go into 1x/LTE mode, you will be able to keep the weak signal.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

Oh ok thanks for the info oh and i just got back from the sprint store like a few minutes ago and played with the evo lte and i toggled airplane mode and found out that Little Rock also has eHRPD live. But the weird thing was after that i turned on the other evo lte they had and it was the one that was recently updated and found out that it wasnt on eHRPD even though i b it was a cold start boot up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

dang so that mean I won't be able to get 4g in my apartments if I got that phone cause I'm at -95dbm for 1x and like -80 through -88dbm inside.

 

People, I sound like a broken record, but I am going to keep hammering away at this. Many of you worry way too much about LTE coverage at home when ~95 percent of you should already have the equivalent of 4G at home -- broadband Internet access and Wi-Fi.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

People, I sound like a broken record, but I am going to keep hammering away at this. Many of you worry way too much about LTE coverage at home when ~95 percent of you should already have the equivalent of 4G at home -- broadband Internet access and Wi-Fi.

 

AJ

yeah but not everyone has wifi like when i go to FL for example I stay with my family who are old fashion and only thing they have is some basic metro pcs phones and no way of getting online but as far as lte at home I don't really care cause I'm not going to be using it, just for bragging rights. Seriously though being over their is bad though cause i get bad speeds and have to stand outside to get WiMAX and inside only get 1 bar with 3G speeds like 100kbps or less. And it's the only way to stay connected. And I wouldn't mind going outside but it's not the best place to be alone outside.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn I really hope an OTA update will fix these issues :/

 

Same here but I'm starting 2 lose hope. I'm the type that never thinks negative but driving around and not having lte turn on its own stinks. Only real issue 2 me even though the sprint tower by my house even has a bird nest on it but that's not a big deal to me lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE on the S3 works like a dream, I can't believe Sprint/HTC messed up this bad on their flagship

I agree. Just got an s3 on my account and it was getting 4g inside the house as soon as I brought it home. My EVO LTE has NEVER gotten 4g outside my house much less inside.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People, I am so sick and tired of the bitching and moaning about the EVO LTE and its LTE connectivity issues. Most of you have never used the EVO LTE in a mature LTE market, so you do not understand that it works reasonably well. No, it is not the equal of the Galaxy S3, but the Galaxy S3 is not the equal of the EVO LTE in other regards. The Galaxy S3 is more cheap Samsung plastic, burn in prone AMOLED, and resolution challenged PenTile.

 

So, do you want better build quality or better LTE connectivity? Pick your poison. If you want both on Sprint right now, you basically have to follow the sheep and go with the iPhone 5.

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People' date=' I am so sick and tired of the bitching and moaning about the EVO LTE and its LTE connectivity issues. Most of you have never used the EVO LTE in a mature LTE market, so you do not understand that it works reasonably well. No, it is not the equal of the Galaxy S3, but the Galaxy S3 is not the equal of the EVO LTE in other regards. The Galaxy S3 is more cheap Samsung plastic, burn in prone AMOLED, and resolution challenged PenTile.

 

So, do you want better build quality or better LTE connectivity? Pick your poison. If you want both on Sprint right now, you basically have to follow the sheep and go with the iPhone 5.

 

AJ[/quote']

 

Now you're ranting against ranting :-)

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now you're ranting against ranting :-)

 

Guilty as charged. But I am having a bad NFL Sunday and have to let off some steam...

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Guilty as charged. But I am having a bad NFL Sunday and have to let off some steam...

 

AJ

 

You can drive to MN, and I'll let you fire off a few rounds with my 300 WSM hunting rifle. That's as good as meditation for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...