Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - South Carolina Market (Columbia/Greenville/Spartanburg)


wyndd123

Recommended Posts

Ok it randomly dropped and asked my dad and he don't have data either I'm on WiFi right now just hope this gets upgraded faster than is said

 

Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

Tech support was no help. They are saying 24 to 72 hours. Makes you think what could be? Cold weather LOL? Maybe we are about to have some 800 service.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have data back (for) now l, I did notice slower let on white horse rd today when I tested it. Maybe the late coverage will improve over this upgrade period.

 

800 lte...... don't make me drool early greenvillesc Haha but there's always hope and unknowns.

 

Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

 

Edited by ghostkilla1388
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoping that this network vision help coverage, especially in buildings. If there weren't trees in the day I probably could see the closest tower to me about a mile away. So far I have decent 3g at my work which is good.

 

Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been getting alerts from Signal Check Pro about 1x 800 coverage in the Columbia area. Phone seems to treat it like a roaming condition as it tries to cycle to a different tower or frequency so it may have pretty low priority in the PRL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJCola dose your Sprint zone app under my device, then dashboard, then voice network say any tickets like the one I posted a pic of the other day? I looked at a friend's Sprint gs3 and it had nothing under it for network upgrades but I have noticed it has been better than usual. The ticket is supposed to be closed tomorrow as far as a voice and data issue and the network vision ticket also, I'll keep y'all posted of it dose and if I see an improvement.

 

Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My voice coverage has gotten better but no 800 yet, although I wish I could say the same for data. Although my 3g speeds have been fluctuating, sometimes over 1.5mbps others barely 0.05mbps. I still yet to find out who's new tower is going up on ceader lane road near riverside family restaurant, a cross from it actually.

 

Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SprintFreeMsg: Over the next month the new network will be largely completed in your area making it better than ever! http://sprint.us/network1 Reply S to stop

 

Woke up to this earlier today. According to them it'll be two months late, but better late than never lol.. Excited.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My voice coverage has gotten better but no 800 yet, although I wish I could say the same for data. Although my 3g speeds have been fluctuating, sometimes over 1.5mbps others barely 0.05mbps. I still yet to find out who's new tower is going up on ceader lane road near riverside family restaurant, a cross from it actually. Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

that's a cleartalk tower.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleartalk? I'm gonna have to look them up never heard of them. I was hoping it was a Sprint tower. Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

It's a prepaid provider - I.... Think...

 

 

On an unrelated note, the tower just off 378 in West Columbia across from the Jersey Mike's is now LTE live.

 

Not as fast as I'd expect, but faster than 3G. I mapped I-26 to Downtown on Sensorly this afternoon as well. Didn't get a gap in LTE even on my HTC ONE that is notorious for lack luster LTE reception.

 

post-15449-0-11015900-1391548680_thumb.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a prepaid provider - I.... Think...

On an unrelated note, the tower just off 378 in West Columbia across from the Jersey Mike's is now LTE live.

Not as fast as I'd expect, but faster than 3G. I mapped I-26 to Downtown on Sensorly this afternoon as well. Didn't get a gap in LTE even on my HTC ONE that is notorious for lack luster LTE reception.

 

That's plenty fast! That's 8.95 Mbps. Maybe it'd help to switch from kilobytes per second to megabits per second in the app.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJCola dose your Sprint zone app under my device, then dashboard, then voice network say any tickets like the one I posted a pic of the other day? I looked at a friend's Sprint gs3 and it had nothing under it for network upgrades but I have noticed it has been better than usual. The ticket is supposed to be closed tomorrow as far as a voice and data issue and the network vision ticket also, I'll keep y'all posted of it dose and if I see an improvement.

 

Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

I'm not running a Sprint / Samsung Touchwiz ROM so I cannot answer for those applications.  However, the following link should display the same information you are asking about.  Not much regarding NV of late for me.  Have dropped calls now and previously may have been tower under upgrades.

 

http://zone.sprint.com/servicetrender/getstatus?mdn=[Yournumberhere]

 

Note:  Your post was difficult to read and was thus skipped after several English errors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's plenty fast! That's 8.95 Mbps. Maybe it'd help to switch from kilobytes per second to megabits per second in the app.

File size is in bytes... I like the math better to see it in kilobytes.

 

 

But, compared to this result I pulled from tower CR04AW453 just down the road from this new tower, it's about 66% slower.

 

Posted Image

 

Sent from my Rooted HTC ONE running ViperOne 3.5.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are getting awesome speeds. 23Mbps! I just think that in measuring internet speeds, megabits per second is the standard. In measuring file download speed, we look at kilobytes per second or megabytes per second because we know how large the file we are downloading is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

File size is in bytes... I like the math better to see it in kilobytes.

 

 

But, compared to this result I pulled from tower CR04AW453 just down the road from this new tower, it's about 66% slower.

 

Posted Image

 

Sent from my Rooted HTC ONE running ViperOne 3.5.

You can use Bytes over Bits for your personal use. But please don't post screen shots here in Bytes. It confuses people, because everyone else posts in bits. And it gives the impression that Sprint's speeds are slow, when in reality 23Mbps is a very good result on a 5MHz carrier. And I can tell you everyone who has ever posted here a screen shot from another provider did so using bits. Thanks.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...