Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Jacksonville Market (including Gainesville/St. Augustine/Ocala)


Syph3r

Recommended Posts

Sandridge Rd in Clay County

 

uploadfromtaptalk1353168949389.jpg

 

 

Layin down sensorly

 

 

Edit* couldn't tell where its coming from lost just north of green cove its gor to be north of 209.. on a run to orlando or I would investigate more

 

The signal could be coming from the tower on 209 by the shriners building.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the sensorly map the signal will be coming from the tower that's near the race Trac gas station on the corner of us 17 and cr209. The tower its on looks like some kind of broadcasting antenna or something.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the other 2 that we know of will come online soon. I've been keeping my eyes on all the Sprint towers I see. I enjoyed my 4g experience while it lasted used almost 200mb doing speedtest

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the other 2 that we know of will come online soon. I've been keeping my eyes on all the Sprint towers I see. I enjoyed my 4g experience while it lasted used almost 200mb doing speedtest

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

Wait, so there's 4 towers known? Are you also including the Baymeadows one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I caught 4g in a new area. I'll update with info in a minute.

 

EDIT: I mapped more of the LTE tower on Russel Road. Also found a weak LTE signal on the Eastern side of Shands Bridge! I did not have Sensorly open yet and I lost signal after about 10 seconds! I'll try to map it if I go by there again.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope not, I'm in the Riverside area. Haven't seen anything yet.

 

Well seems as if the back haul is ready faster at sites outside the city or maybe they are working from the outside in to the city like they did with the Chicago market.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope.. no Lte at the moment at that location. I rebooted both my devices and airplane cycled just to be sure , while getting gas at the Gate gas station looking directly at the tower. I also looked into the Open signal app and it did not show me being connected to that tower it showed a tower just a mile or so north off of interstate 95 ... I'm gonna swing by later and actually check the tower and equipment out, shuold be easy enough to see the Sprint lock on it and got a pair of field glasses to check out the rest.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope.. no Lte at the moment at that location. I rebooted both my devices and airplane cycled just to be sure , while getting gas at the Gate gas station looking directly at the tower. I also looked into the Open signal app and it did not show me being connected to that tower it showed a tower just a mile or so north off of interstate 95 ... I'm gonna swing by later and actually check the tower and equipment out, shuold be easy enough to see the Sprint lock on it and got a pair of field glasses to check out the rest.

Note that CDMA towers give off the wrong coordinates in OpenSignalMaps. It's known that it's very difficult to discover which tower you're actually connected to.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note that CDMA towers give off the wrong coordinates in OpenSignalMaps. It's known that it's very difficult to discover which tower you're actually connected to.

 

The bogus sites mapped in OpenSignal maps have nothing to do with the coordinates squawked by the CDMA towers, which is a different issue entirely, evident in different apps altogether. OpenSignal purports to compute the tower sites itself from crowdsourced signal-strength data, and the results are pretty useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bogus sites mapped in OpenSignal maps have nothing to do with the coordinates squawked by the CDMA towers, which is a different issue entirely, evident in different apps altogether. OpenSignal purports to compute the tower sites itself from crowdsourced signal-strength data, and the results are pretty useless.

I learned this the hard way. I drove to the "imaginary" tower in my area only to find nothing there. LoL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work in the Bayard area (95 and Old St Augustine Rd near the hospital) and am eagerly awaiting LTE. Should I be worried that I am not seeing eHRPD yet?

 

Sadly, my EVO had solid Wimax when I worked in Riverside but I was faced with paying to repair it or being an early adopter of LTE and chose the Galaxy lll. Best phone I have ever owned but 3G is brutal:blink:

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work in the Bayard area (95 and Old St Augustine Rd near the hospital) and am eagerly awaiting LTE. Should I be worried that I am not seeing eHRPD yet?

 

Sadly, my EVO had solid Wimax when I worked in Riverside but I was faced with paying to repair it or being an early adopter of LTE and chose the Galaxy lll. Best phone I have ever owned but 3G is brutal:blink:

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

I get ehrpd along i95 there. Are you in lte/CDMA mode? Its possible that they turned it off temporarily.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...