Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - West Washington Market (Seattle/Puget Sound Region)


drlovety

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

Yes, really about damn time. Verizon has already rolled out mmWave through out all of DT Kirkland (and what looks like maybe C-Band in a couple places).

Yeah - Verizon has got a lot of mmWave small cells in that area.

That being said, they still have the poorest indoor coverage since they’ve only got one macro at the marina (SEA Moss Bay). SEA Feriton (on 6th by the Google campus) helps, but not a ton. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/8/2021 at 11:04 AM, PedroDaGr8 said:

Looks like they changed their mind. That or they are just covering all of their bases:

Permit ID: BLD21040
Application Date: 04/08/2021
Project Address: 14125 NE 189TH ST B
Project Name: 880310 Sprint/TMO Installation
Project Description: T-Mobile to remove existing platform and equipment and extend tower 20', install new platform mount with (6) antennas, (6) radios, (1) MW, (2) lines, relocate (1) replace (1) cabinet in existing compound.

 

Interesting that they intend to make that tower 20 feet taller. It seems that would make the cross-talk worse, unless they intend to not populate the direction pointing towards town. 

Was at my companies site in the Warehouse district today when my Sprint signal cutoff. I get zero T-Mobile signal in the lab so it was very obvious. Anyways, when I left work, I drove by the Warehouse district tower and it was decapitated:

https://imgur.com/a/rpX07lU

Also, the Sprint site down by the Woodinville Slough (SE35XC004) has been fully converted but isn't live yet. Not a trace of Sprint on the site anymore from what I can see. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

Was at my companies site in the Warehouse district today when my Sprint signal cutoff. I get zero T-Mobile signal in the lab so it was very obvious. Anyways, when I left work, I drove by the Warehouse district tower and it was decapitated:

https://imgur.com/a/rpX07lU

Also, the Sprint site down by the Woodinville Slough (SE35XC004) has been fully converted but isn't live yet. Not a trace of Sprint on the site anymore from what I can see. 

Ooh - good progress! I’m interested to see what the azimuths are for the Woodinville warehouse district tower. 

What equipment is on the Valley Industrial site?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RAvirani said:

Ooh - good progress! I’m interested to see what the azimuths are for the Woodinville warehouse district tower. 

What equipment is on the Valley Industrial site?

I will try to get some pictures later today but per the permit:

310599 National Glass SE02023A
T-MOBILE PROPOSES TO COLLOCATE ON AN EXISTING UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AS FOLLOWS: TOWER SCOPE OF WORK: REMOVE SPRINT ANTENNAS, RRU'S, FILTERS, MOUNT KIT, & CABLES. INSTALL A PLATFORM MOUNT W/ HANDRAIL KIT. INSTALL (3) FFVV-65C-R3-V1 & (3) AEHC PANEL ANTENNAS. INSTALL (3) AHLOA & (3) AHFIG RRU'S. INSTALL (2) HCS 2.0 PENDANT STYLE HYBRID CABLES GROUND SCOPE OF WORK: REMOVE SPRINT EQUIPMENT CABINETS, GPS ANTENNA, & UTILITY H-FRAME W/ TELCO BOX, METER, & PPC. INSTALL A 6'-0"x10'-0" ICE CANOPY. INSTALL (1) HPL3 BATTERY CABINET W/ (4) STRINGS OF BATTERIES & (1) HPL3 POWER CABINET W/ (2) AMIA, (2) ASIB, (3) ABIA, (3) ABIC, (2) ASIK, (4) ABIL, (1) FSMF, (1) CSR IXRe V1 ROUTER, (1) VOLTAGE BOOSTER W/ (2) AMPLIFIERS, & (1) EXTRA AMPLIFIER ? INSTALL (1) 25 kW DIESEL GENERATOR ? INSTALL (1) GPS ANTENNA, (2) HCS 2.0 JUNCTION BOXES, & (1) H-FRAME W/ TELCO BOX, TECH LIGHT W/ TIMER, PPC, DISCONNECT, & 200A METER

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is apparently cell tower week in Woodinville as Verizon has joined in on the fun, upgrading their DT Woodinville site.

 

As of today, they have increased the height of the Warehouse district tower in about about jankiest way possible, by bolting an extension to the top. I'm sure it is structurally sound but it sure looks cheap at this stage: 

Wi8oNiM.jpg

F1RxYJV.jpg

The National Glass site is still not live as it is still being worked on. The workers were still there, as evidenced by the safety cables still hanging from the rack. Here is the equipment installed: 

f6HB2wI.jpg

CBGc6GK.jpg

The last is a couple images of the Verizon work:

Z2XXbFk.jpg

jUET4XS.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

It is apparently cell tower week in Woodinville as Verizon has joined in on the fun, upgrading their DT Woodinville site.

That’s likely because Verizon is colocating onto the T-Mobile/Clearwire downtown site.

10 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

As of today, they have increased the height of the Warehouse district tower in about about jankiest way possible, by bolting an extension to the top. I'm sure it is structurally sound but it sure looks cheap at this stage: 

 

 

This is actually pretty standard for height increases but I agree - it does look a bit funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RAvirani said:

That’s likely because Verizon is colocating onto the T-Mobile/Clearwire downtown site.

Are you sure about that? When I drove by this morning, it looks like they are done on the tower. They have basically installed all new  antennas on that tower and even added three Ericsson 6488 n48 CBRS panel. Seems strange to so that upgrade now is they will just be moving in the not too distant future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

Are you sure about that? When I drove by this morning, it looks like they are done on the tower. They have basically installed all new  antennas on that tower and even added three Ericsson 6488 n48 CBRS panel. Seems strange to so that upgrade now is they will just be moving in the not too distant future.

Oh no - they will be keeping both locations.

Azimuths on the existing Verizon tower needed to be adjusted to keep the noise floor low, since the T-Mobile tower is relatively close by. That Verizon tower was also way overdue for 4x MIMO and highband given the demand for data in that area. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile has been busy! The Sprint Keep site by the 405/522 intersection (eNB 745951) has also been converted in the past week or so.  None of the convert sites are live yet but two new b41 sites went live today.  I haven't located them yet but I think I know which ones they are.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/11/2021 at 2:40 PM, PedroDaGr8 said:

It is apparently cell tower week in Woodinville as Verizon has joined in on the fun, upgrading their DT Woodinville site.

I stopped by this site and was surprised to see that they disabled lowband carrier aggregation after the upgrade (midband was moved to the 300,000 offset eNB). I thought that site’s lowband and midband footprints almost entirely overlapped. 

I wonder if they’re anticipating increased lowband load from n5 usage…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2021 at 10:21 AM, RAvirani said:

I stopped by this site and was surprised to see that they disabled lowband carrier aggregation after the upgrade (midband was moved to the 300,000 offset eNB). I thought that site’s lowband and midband footprints almost entirely overlapped. 

I wonder if they’re anticipating increased lowband load from n5 usage…

I wouldn't be surprised if they intend to do similar to TMo with the low-band (b71 in TMos case) being the primary carrier and mid-band providing the high data throughout (n41 for TMo). 

The warehouse district site is complete. I snapped some pics of the work in progress last week. Weather hasn't complied with snapping a final finished shot. 

None of the conversion sites I have come across are live yet. I have no idea why because they are all 100% complete. Hope it's soon because a bunch of coworkers who are T-Mobile customers have been complaining about how bad the signal has gotten recently. It's essentially non-existent at the back of our Woodinville location.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/2/2021 at 10:55 AM, PedroDaGr8 said:

I wouldn't be surprised if they intend to do similar to TMo with the low-band (b71 in TMos case) being the primary carrier and mid-band providing the high data throughout (n41 for TMo). 

The warehouse district site is complete. I snapped some pics of the work in progress last week. Weather hasn't complied with snapping a final finished shot. 

None of the conversion sites I have come across are live yet. I have no idea why because they are all 100% complete. Hope it's soon because a bunch of coworkers who are T-Mobile customers have been complaining about how bad the signal has gotten recently. It's essentially non-existent at the back of our Woodinville location.

 

I have heard this a lot about the SEA market - I moved away in January, but been hearing conversion sites are not online yet. Seriously wonder why. I cannot think of a reason myself. @RAvirani I saw earlier in the thread you had a email thread going on with someone at T-Mobile? Probably the regional network manager? Might you reach out to him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, xmx1024 said:

I have heard this a lot about the SEA market - I moved away in January, but been hearing conversion sites are not online yet. Seriously wonder why. I cannot think of a reason myself. @RAvirani I saw earlier in the thread you had a email thread going on with someone at T-Mobile? Probably the regional network manager? Might you reach out to him?

There’s a good bit of complexity to bringing sites online, even conversions.

Integration/etc takes time because they don’t just affect the conversion site, but every site around said conversion. Surrounding sites’ electrical downtilts need to be edited, handoff parameters need to be optimized, CA needs to be configured, neighbor lists have to be updated, PCIs/PRACH RSIs need to be carefully chosen, etc; and that’s barely scratching the surface. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RAvirani said:

There’s a good bit of complexity to bringing sites online, even conversions.

Integration/etc takes time because they don’t just affect the conversion site, but every site around said conversion. Surrounding sites’ electrical downtilts need to be edited, handoff parameters need to be optimized, CA needs to be configured, neighbor lists have to be updated, PCIs/PRACH RSIs need to be carefully chosen, etc; and that’s barely scratching the surface. 

Fair, and that can be tough in a more urban environment. All the conversion sites in my area in southern AZ were online within a week, and it seems all (if not most) in WA have not been turned on, even after multiple months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, xmx1024 said:

Fair, and that can be tough in a more urban environment. All the conversion sites in my area in southern AZ were online within a week, and it seems all (if not most) in WA have not been turned on, even after multiple months.

The team down there might have done more planning before site builds or they may take a more ANR-focused approach when it comes to neighbor relations.  You'd be surprised how differently teams in different regions operate.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2021 at 8:36 PM, RAvirani said:

The team down there might have done more planning before site builds or they may take a more ANR-focused approach when it comes to neighbor relations.  You'd be surprised how differently teams in different regions operate.  

You would think they would have done extensive planning in advance when selecting to keep a site. Maybe that's being presumptuous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

You would think they would have done extensive planning in advance when selecting to keep a site. Maybe that's being presumptuous.

I don't think they knew how Sprint customers would behave.  Nor Boost Mobile customers.  Especially down to the cell site level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/6/2021 at 12:49 PM, PedroDaGr8 said:

You would think they would have done extensive planning in advance when selecting to keep a site. Maybe that's being presumptuous.

On 12/6/2021 at 1:10 PM, dkyeager said:

I don't think they knew how Sprint customers would behave.  Nor Boost Mobile customers.  Especially down to the cell site level.

When planning to close a coverage hole, network teams use a “search ring” methodology. Upon selecting a site that falls inside the ring, they will choose azimuths and mechanical downtilts that satisfy the coverage objective.

While softwares like Atoll/Planet/Asset (these are the three big ones) can provide very accurate propagation models, the models are only as good as the clutter data and clutter loss parameters (the DEM/DTM data is usually good enough to not worry about these days). For simulations (e.g. Monte-Carlo load simulations), you also need accurate traffic maps. As a result, some level of real-world testing is usually necessary to close out the electrical downtilts, exact RS ERPE per port, connection release/handoff parameters, etc.

After that, there’s a good bit of testing (call/integration/etc) that takes time too. On occasion, sites may also be delayed because they don’t have back haul or permanent power. This is more often the case in rural areas than urban/suburban areas. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RAvirani said:

When planning to close a coverage hole, network teams use a “search ring” methodology. Upon selecting a site that falls inside the ring, they will choose azimuths and mechanical downtilts that satisfy the coverage objective.

While softwares like Atoll and Planet (these are the two big ones) can provide very accurate propagation models, the models are only as good as the clutter data and clutter loss parameters (the DEM/DTM data is usually good enough to not worry about these days). For simulations (e.g. Monte-Carlo load simulations), you also need accurate traffic maps. As a result, some level of real-world testing is usually necessary to close out the electrical downtilts, exact RS ERPE per port, connection release/handoff parameters, etc.

After that, there’s a good bit of testing (call/integration/etc) that takes time too. On occasion, sites may also be delayed because they don’t have back haul or permanent power. This is more often the case in rural areas than urban/suburban areas. 

Very good description. And hi guys it’s been quite a long time.Very good description. And hi guys it’s been quite a long time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears T-Mobile is pushing forward with upgrading the Totem Lake Motel 6 site SMDH. I really hoped they would change their mind and scrap that site.

Permit to replace the hardware:

https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/BNR21-09062/Kirkland

Permit to upgrade the site:

https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/WIR21-00584/Kirkland

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...