Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Lower Central Valley Market (Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia)


aelenes

Recommended Posts

I went by the tower that serves the Shaw/Villa area tonight just for kicks, and it has not been updated. If there's any where else you see it, run a speed test to verify and definitely let us know where you're seeing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I heard there is a lte sight up and running up on highway 41 somewhere near coarsegold I don't know if its further past or where just found out from a engineering friend he said its been up for a few months now idk if its live yet or what .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what i know Sprint Only Has Two Towers That Been Approved But they are not on the list i gave.....The Lady i know at city hall is a planner and she informed me she was gonna work with sprint on there permits :) She also said that she was gonna have them finished by the end of next week.Once Her and sprint Plan everything out then will be submitted to another dept in the permit process.....She said hopefully Sprint would start work in less than a month If everything with planning goes good .But i will keep everyone up with the process

 

Where are the approved towers located?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found two NV-upgraded sites in Clovis today. They're not in the city, but they do have Clovis addresses.

 

"Unincomporated Fresno County" doesnt have the same ring to it

 

Would one happen to be Shaw and Highland?

 

I have family in the area who have been complaining of abysmal service this past month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the secrets?

 

I'm not going to point out tower locations outside of the sponsor forums.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4024-lower-central-valley-network-vision-permit-map/page-3

 

 

Doesn't mean anything

 

 

 

 

Considering that 1.) I was point blank on these two upgraded towers and had no LTE, and 2.) there's multiple towers between the two in question and the areas you said you had LTE and especially so at Shaw and Villa, where there's a non-NV tower within sight of that intersection, yeah, I think it does.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...