Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

That's some great news, my parents live in Fox River Grove and when I was home from school over the summer I noticed there was a dead spot in CL along route 31 and in Cary. I'm guessing the sites at Cog Circle by Portillo's and the water tower in downtown Cary are still not live with LTE? When I'm out there I mostly see my phone connecting to those sites when I'm in Cary or Crystal lake. When I'm at home in Fox River Grove it's usually a split between Cold Spring Rd, the downtown Cary water tower and the Kelsey Rd site, and LTE being pretty scarce.

 

I know that there is a Clear site located on the Ski Jump in FRG, and that there is a USSC site on top of the FRG water tower. I hope they convert those to NV eventually, because Sprint doesn't have the best coverage in FRG.

 

And those sites that still aren't live with LTE, don't they have microwave back haul installed?

The uscc site will not be converted, sprint didn't buy the towers, just spectrum. The coverage will get better with voice and lte on 800

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the other Crystal Lake sites have improved 3g speed now?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

Yesterday stopped at the big Starbucks with the drive-thru on US 14 in Crystal Lake.

 

While inside the car I witnessed nothing but 3G on my Moto X with 273 ms ping times and download speeds... when the network would stay connected...of a pathetic 80 kb/sec.

 

Hopefully that has all changed.

 

Going to Portillo's shortly, will update after.

 

Later: Got 104 ms ping, 1651 kbps down, 646 kbps up outside Portillo's, 109 ms ping, 704 kbps down, 525 kbps up outside Starbucks.  This is much better than athens' results, and also much better than results I have gotten from that tower before.  It suggests that the link from the "Portillo's" site to the switch has been improved, but note that my readings are on a Sunday night, so network traffic is likely fairly low. I got even faster pings (98 & 94 ms) further west on 14 while still connected to the same tower.

 

Edit:  Later:  I am getting multiple copies of texts tonight.  In the past, that has happened when Sprint was making changes in the local network (for example, last June, when 800 SMR came up).  Maybe I'm being silly, but I'm hoping that this means new local services. [ :fingers:  ]

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Staying here at the Springhill Suites near the airport, loving LTE everywhere!

 

This is what a deployed market should look like. I've been here for 6 hours now, and have yet to see my phone show 3G or 1x.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Staying here at the Springhill Suites near the airport, loving LTE everywhere!

 

This is what a deployed market should look like. I've been here for 6 hours now, and have yet to see my phone show 3G or 1x.

Yeah illinois seems pretty covered by what ive seen and experienced.

 

Sent from my T-Mobile LG Escape using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Miracle has apparently happened!!!!!

 

Site CH[censored] at Routes 31 and 176 in Crystal Lake, IL, has gone live with Band 25 LTE only 14 months after the NV hardware was installed!  This morning, I clocked data speeds up to 34.4 Mbps down and 10.4 Mbps up, with pings between 53 and 85 ms.

attachicon.gifScreenshot_1013-09-22-09-05-48.jpg attachicon.gifScreenshot_2013-09-22-08-51-23.jpg

 

Why is this important? Because several sites in the far Chicago exurbs (Crystal Lake, Dekalb, others) have been stalled for months, for no visible reason. The upgraded Network vision hardware was visibly installed (new antennas, RRUs) in the summer of 2012, and in a number of cases, 800 SMR for voice and text was activated in the late spring and early summer of this year, and that has been a good thing.  But LTE has been completely missing.

 

3 NV-upgraded sites remain without LTE in Crystal Lake and Cary, and now one can only hope that they get their LTE soonest.

 

Now what will I rant about?  Hmmm.  Well, I was actually chasing Band 41 on a co-located Clear site when I found the new Band 25. No Band 41 evident.  And I have been chasing an elusive Band 41 site in Algonquin, IL, for weeks.  I KNOW where it is, and I get Band 41 signal from it on my Zing only in really odd places, but never near the site itself (so I can't get good speed numbers).  And, oh, yeah, where's that pesky new Band 26?  I guess I'm not out of topics yet.

 

But I am so irrationally happy over today's discovery, I am almost tempted to forgive Sprint for all of its past indiscretions.  Almost. ( :P )

 

Crazy 800Mhz voice coverage out there.  :tu:   How is the services compared to 2 years ago?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crazy 800Mhz voice coverage out there. :tu: How is the services compared to 2 years ago?

Service is much, much better than 2 years ago, or a year ago. Took the choo choo in to Chicago yesterday (50 miles) had 800 SMR all the way, LTE nearly all the way, and had excellent voice and LTE in the Loop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Service is much, much better than 2 years ago, or a year ago. Took the choo choo in to Chicago yesterday (50 miles) had 800 SMR all the way, LTE nearly all the way, and had excellent voice and LTE in the Loop.

Oh yes for sure, its much better than a year ago, its much better than 6 months ago, especially downtown.  Back in April or May I calculated downtown had about 35% of its towers with LTE, the rest stuck on legacy 3G, now its about 65%.  Lots of other holes have been filled in; McCormick Place, Soldier Field, O'hare, Lakeview, N Michigan Ave.  Most of these sites now have LTE, just a few without.  The last remaining towers that need LTE upgrade I was told will happen before the end of the year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://wgntv.com/2013/10/03/cta-announces-plans-to-upgrade-underground-wireless-service/

Looks like they are working with all the carriers, they still haven't got the design and installation together yet. But still it is good news for people who do ride the blue and red line a lot

 

"The CTA currently leases its subway cellular network to six major wireless providers." I'm assuming these six are the Big Four + USCC and Cricket? The latter two are going away so I suppose it will just support the bands of the remaining four. This will be pretty nice when it rolls out, but I hope people stay aware of their surroundings and don't walk on to the tracks or get mugged.

 

The Chicago market (which Robert had predicted would be 3G complete by the end of September) is tantalizingly close to being finished with NV 1.0 equipment upgrades. After the bunch of 9 3G acceptances from 9/25, I believe there are just two remaining legacy sites. I wonder how we can celebrate Chicago becoming the very first market to reach 3G completion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The CTA currently leases its subway cellular network to six major wireless providers." I'm assuming these six are the Big Four + USCC and Cricket? The latter two are going away so I suppose it will just support the bands of the remaining four. This will be pretty nice when it rolls out, but I hope people stay aware of their surroundings and don't walk on to the tracks or get mugged.

 

The Chicago market (which Robert had predicted would be 3G complete by the end of September) is tantalizingly close to being finished with NV 1.0 equipment upgrades. After the bunch of 9 3G acceptances from 9/25, I believe there are just two remaining legacy sites. I wonder how we can celebrate Chicago becoming the very first market to reach 3G completion?

That is the six providers, I think sprint should cover chicago with 800 lte. We already got 2600 covering most chicago market and not many cell sites with 1900 lte to get backhaul. Then we would could the first market to be on are way to nv 2.0 :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/22943303-418/cta-moving-ahead-with-subway-wireless-upgrade-to-4g.html

 

CTA moves ahead on upgrading subway wireless to 4G

 

 

 

Blue and Red Line subway riders would be able to receive emails, text friends and browse the Internet under a plan announced Thursday to upgrade the agency’s underground wireless network.

 

The Chicago Transit Authority Thursday plans to boost the subway wireless network from the first-generation 1G technology, which supports mostly basic phone functions, to more current and versatile 4G.

 

“I think that’s great,’’ Red Line rider Ronny Polk, 39, said Thursday. “I’d be able to use my Internet and all the data on my phone.’’

 

Now, after the Red Line goes into a tunnel somewhere after 35th Street, his smartphone is almost useless.

 

“It’s dead. There’s no signal,’’ Polk said.

 

Emails pop up late, some incoming calls wind up in voicemail, and he can’t access the CTA bus tracker to find out what time a connecting bus will be available when he gets off the Red Line.

 

The CTA wireless system dates back to 2005 and cost $12 million to install. The CTA leases its underground wireless service to six vendors — Verizon, Sprint, ATT, T-Mobile, Cricket and U.S. Cellular — for $1.8 million annually.

 

“The infrastructure was pioneering for the transit industry when it was installed and through this upgrade initiative, CTA looks to lead in the industry once more by offering a fully-operational, 4G network across all major wireless service providers,” CTA President Forrest Claypool said in a statement.

 

Requests for qualifications of possible bidders were posted Thursday, with responses due by Nov. 14, CTA spokeswoman Catherine Hosinski said. At the earliest, work would start in mid-2014, with the current wireless network remaining operational until upgrades are completed.

 

The project will be funded through CTA’s annual capital program.

 

The CTA’s tunnels speed travelers underground on the Blue and Red Lines, where subways cover 12 miles underground but separate into 24 miles of individual tunnels.

 

Blue Line rider Lupe Martinez, 24, said a 4G connection would definitely be helpful as subway trains barrel underground.

 

“Once I hit those tunnels, I really don’t have service,’’ Martinez said Thursday. “I’m on my phone, looking things up, and I realize I don’t have an Internet connection. I’m looking at email and it kind of stops until I get to another area. So I think it would be great.’’

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool. Now when I get my iPhone stolen on the red line, at least I'll have LTE. :)

 

No, the thief will have LTE. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/22943303-418/cta-moving-ahead-with-subway-wireless-upgrade-to-4g.html

 

The Chicago Transit Authority Thursday plans to boost the subway wireless network from the first-generation 1G technology, which supports mostly basic phone functions, to more current and versatile 4G.

 

If they actually installed a 1G network (in 2005, just three years before the AMPS shutdown) then that would explain why no one has any service. However, since those six carriers are paying a good sum for access, I'm going to assume that was either a typo, or someone equated CDMA 1x with 1G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got done driving from the Chicagoland area to Rockford. Data was basically unusable all the way from Hoffman estates to basically Rockford. I even dropped a few calls. Not good. Anyone else experience this horribly long stretch of I-90?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4G Shuts off after you pass Randall exit . It should kick on over in Belvidere and Rockford should be pretty well covered.  My Sprint phone is the Optimus G. Being on 1x800 I dont remember the last time I dropped a call. Maybe a few months back in LITH Costco. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4G Shuts off after you pass Randall exit . It should kick on over in Belvidere and Rockford should be pretty well covered. My Sprint phone is the Optimus G. Being on 1x800 I dont remember the last time I dropped a call. Maybe a few months back in LITH Costco.

I was actually visiting friends in belvedere. We drove all around that town. 3G everywhere except the center of town, that had a little LTE showing up. And very slow 3G. Pages wouldn't load, speed tests timed out. I know Rockford is pretty well covered. Belvedere, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they actually installed a 1G network (in 2005, just three years before the AMPS shutdown) then that would explain why no one has any service. However, since those six carriers are paying a good sum for access, I'm going to assume that was either a typo, or someone equated CDMA 1x with 1G.

I ride the red line everyday, as soon as we hit the underground Subway portion my phone goes into 3G roam with a strong signal, but there is never any connectivity.  I never really understood why it would show 3G roam but you couldn't use your phone since it behaves like there is no service.  I guess I understand now, if its 1G its voice only?  So no data and texts then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should have been more specific. On I90 the tower on Anthony rd in Garden Prairie is 4g. And that covers 90 for a good stretch. Belvidere coverage sucks for 4g. A few days ago saw them running lines. First thought was fiber not sure though. If it was the tower by route 20 in bv should provide a major boost around town.

 

 

I was actually visiting friends in belvedere. We drove all around that town. 3G everywhere except the center of town, that had a little LTE showing up. And very slow 3G. Pages wouldn't load, speed tests timed out. I know Rockford is pretty well covered. Belvedere, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ride the red line everyday, as soon as we hit the underground Subway portion my phone goes into 3G roam with a strong signal, but there is never any connectivity. I never really understood why it would show 3G roam but you couldn't use your phone since it behaves like there is no service. I guess I understand now, if its 1G its voice only? So no data and texts then?

I really really can't wait till they complete this. I have LTE all downtown till I hit the subway.

 

Sent from my T-Mobile LG Escape running 4.1.2 using Tapatalk 2 now Free

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do have a question. I have an iPhone 4S and I still have terrible cell phone reception in my building located on the West Loop. I was wondering if the iPhone 4S handled 800MHz voice calls or it's just 1900MHz for this model. 

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...