Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

Has Sprint given an indication on how many USCC towers they will convert?

Sadly no! In central illnois, it seems like they are building where uscc use to have coverage. That is due to losing uscc for roaming though. In Chicago market, It is where they have fair coverage. Like burlington,hampshire(part of the town is roaming), just a few examples. Chicago is the model market, so this is going to happen in other areas :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh wow, Good Job.  If Sprint Takes over most of the Uscc towers in northern IL.,  Network would be bullet proof..  

 

Update: Looking at Google Map again it looks like the Container has been there for a while.  Not sure when its dated. But I doubt I'm that lucky for Sprint to use that tower.   

 

 

 

If you ever make it to Marengo, Check on a tower for me.   Last time I was there I saw a big storage container a lil away from the Uscc tower. Didn't see any work being done. Didn't know if it belong to the owner of the house or what.  But would be a perfect location to add service. I live 5 minutes from there but currently in AZ and have no idea when I'll be back home.  Link is below if you have time...    

 

https://goo.gl/maps/TddQN

They took the uscc antennas off of it and now there is nothing on it now. So it would be a great site to put up a sprint setup on it, a lot of 3g around that area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Samsung's 8T8R FIT was in Rockford, so Sprint was already tied for first there according to RM's previous report from August. The most notable change was T-Mobile dropping out of the four-way tie for first place, due to their drop in call performance. Perhaps there are some bugs with eSRVCC (VoLTE to 2G/3G handover) that have cropped up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samsung's 8T8R FIT was in Rockford, so Sprint was already tied for first there according to RM's previous report from August. The most notable change was T-Mobile dropping out of the four-way tie for first place, due to their drop in call performance. Perhaps there are some bugs with eSRVCC (VoLTE to 2G/3G handover) that have cropped up.

"Since our previous testing in August, Sprint launched its Spark[emoji769] network in the Rockford area. Subsequently, Sprint’s median download speed increased from 9.9 Mbps to 16.8 Mbps, and Sprint’s median upload speed increased from 5.1 Mbps to 7.8 Mbps.

 

Notably, 16.8 Mbps is the fastest median download speed Sprint has recorded in any market we've tested to date."

 

Looks like that second band 41 carrier was helping ease congestion big time. I can't wait until that hits Chicago.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like that second band 41 carrier was helping ease congestion big time. I can't wait until that hits Chicago.

True. With two B41 carriers active, sites there are more likely to have backhaul that is actually fast enough to support the full capacity of the airlink(s).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. With two B41 carriers active, sites there are more likely to have backhaul that is actually fast enough to support the full capacity of the airlink(s).

^^This
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are are there many two b41 carrier sites?

In the Rockford market (Samsung 8t8r FIT), I'm sure most are broadcasting 2. I haven't been up there in about 8 months, but I'm sure we have a member or two that could confirm.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Rockford market (Samsung 8t8r FIT), I'm sure most are broadcasting 2. I haven't been up there in about 8 months, but I'm sure we have a member or two that could confirm.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Excellent. Hopefully sprint has all spark coverage at least 2x20 end of year 2015.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent. Hopefully sprint has all spark coverage at least 2x20 end of year 2015.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They should definitely have that rolling out sooner than that. Multiple spark carriers this year has been on the books for some time now.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Rockford market (Samsung 8t8r FIT), I'm sure most are broadcasting 2. I haven't been up there in about 8 months, but I'm sure we have a member or two that could confirm.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

I was in rockford about month and half ago. I saw them testing the second carrier then, it was only on a handful of sites. They were using 41776 channel(same as they used in kansas, during the world series for the second carrier/channel)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Random question.. When the hell are they going to rename US Cellular Field?? I think Sprint Park (or Sprint Spark Park?!?) has a nice ring to it. I feel a rebranded USCC field would be a great asset for Sprint to have now they are back in the game with the improved network.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Random question.. When the hell are they going to rename US Cellular Field?? I think Sprint Park (or Sprint Spark Park?!?) has a nice ring to it. I feel a rebranded USCC field would be a great asset for Sprint to have now they are back in the game with the improved network.

 

Uh, I hate to call that a stupid question, but Sprint did not acquire USCC.  Additionally, USCC is still headquartered in Chicago and bought New Comiskey Park naming rights for fully 20 years.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, I hate to call that a stupid question, but Sprint did not acquire USCC. Additionally, USCC is still headquartered in Chicago and bought New Comiskey Park naming rights for fully 20 years.

 

AJ

I know that AJ. They sold off their spectrum and subs to Sprint but their HQ is still here like you said. It just seems very irrational for branding to remain on a MLB ballpark after a company that no longer offers any products or services within the Chicago metro area.

 

Even if the naming rights are there for 20 years, contracts can be broken or transferred. USCC doesn't have much to benefit from those naming rights for obvious reasons unless the penalties assessed for terminating the naming agreement are greater than the remaining contract cost.

 

Another observation made before the 2014 season was that the USCC branding on the facade behind home plate was removed. I doubt that would have happened if USCC was still active in the Chicago market. Coincidence? Maybe. But I doubt USCC is fully committed given their Chicagoland exit.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that AJ. They sold off their spectrum and subs to Sprint but their HQ is still here like you said. It just seems very irrational for branding to remain on a MLB ballpark after a company that no longer offers any products or services within the Chicago metro area.

 

Even if the naming rights are there for 20 years, contracts can be broken or transferred. USCC doesn't have much to benefit from those naming rights for obvious reasons unless the penalties assessed for terminating the naming agreement are greater than the remaining contract cost.

 

Another observation made before the 2014 season was that the USCC branding on the facade behind home plate was removed. I doubt that would have happened if USCC was still active in the Chicago market. Coincidence? Maybe. But I doubt USCC is fully committed given their Chicagoland exit.

 

http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/white-sox/post/_/id/14560/the-cell-not-in-line-for-name-change

 

Two years have passed.  Nothing has changed.  Why now?

 

And we do not need Sprint Park.  We already have Sprint Center in Kansas City -- but that naming right purchase was more of a civic pride contribution than anything else.

 

After all, where is T-Mobile Field?  Yet, Magenta seems to be doing okay.  Naming rights have been shown to provide little benefit for already well known brands.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/white-sox/post/_/id/14560/the-cell-not-in-line-for-name-change

 

Two years have passed. Nothing has changed. Why now?

 

And we do not need Sprint Park. We already have Sprint Center in Kansas City -- but that naming right purchase was more of a civic pride contribution than anything else.

 

After all, where is T-Mobile Field? Yet, Magenta seems to be doing okay. Naming rights have been shown to provide little benefit for already well known brands.

 

AJ

I'm not much of a marketing guru but I do realize many dynamics have changed with both USCC and Sprint in the last two years. Such that, IMO, a name change for Sox Park may be more plausable now with those naming rights to be transferred to Sprint in some fashion.

 

Plausibility does not mean certainty and I realize this. But I think it would certainly prove to be a bold move by Sprint if they bought the naming rights to the ballpark sometime in the near future.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote to call it "Comiskey Park."

 

Really?  I thought you would vote for "I Can't Believe It's Not Wrigley Field."

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?  I thought you would vote for "I Can't Believe It's Not Wrigley Field."

 

;)

 

AJ

There is something disturbing about a ball field nicknamed "The Cell".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is something disturbing about a ball field nicknamed "The Cell".

 

But rather appropriate for a state where many of our Governors have lived in one! 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not much of a marketing guru but I do realize many dynamics have changed with both USCC and Sprint in the last two years. Such that, IMO, a name change for Sox Park may be more plausable now with those naming rights to be transferred to Sprint in some fashion.

 

Plausibility does not mean certainty and I realize this. But I think it would certainly prove to be a bold move by Sprint if they bought the naming rights to the ballpark sometime in the near future.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I actually enhanced a couple brief emails with White Sox VP of Marketing Brooks Boyer about this subject a couple years ago.  He acknowledged it was strange to have a company brand the ballpark that has no services or customers in Chicago anymore, but all he could really offer was that the Sox were aware of the strategic changes at USCC and had no plans for a change to the name of the park anytime soon.  Strange situation, but is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...