Jump to content

All Sprint acquisition discussion (was "Japan's Softbank in talks for $12.8 bln Sprint stake")


kckid

Recommended Posts

Well now! That's certainly news. Didn't consider a Japanese cell company getting involved. Is Softbank a CDMA provider in Japan? Are they using similar frequencies as Sprint for LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not good. I don't like it unless they pump money into the company. They are getting Sprint too cheap.

 

I think They would pump money into Sprint. Why not it's an investment? Maybe see some real innovation in the carriers here in the US if they can do something different that we haven't see here before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not good. I don't like it unless they pump money into the company. They are getting Sprint too cheap.

 

They're buying 2/3 of the Company, so at 12.8 billion that values Sprint at about $19.2 Billion. Sprint's market cap at the close yesterday was 15.1 billion. That's a premium of over 25%. Not sure you could hope for more for Sprint right now.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it is an equity investment so, I hope Sprint uses it to finish their Network Vision and acquire some regionals and prepaid. I wonder if some US companies might not be awakened from their slumber and bid. My only problem would be if this was a leveraged buyout, using a company's own assets to borrow money against. In that case it only adds to the companies debt (see Alltel).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not good. I don't like it unless they pump money into the company. They are getting Sprint too cheap.

 

I agree, they're getting the bargain of a century if they get a majority stake in Sprint for 12 billion... IF they pump money into Sprint's assets and network and revolutionize it with the grocery bags full of money Sprint needs!

 

My dark little heart skipped a beat when I saw this headline this morning... but hey, Sprint's legacy is more guaranteed if this happens. Or, perhaps it creates a bidding war for Sprint?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, they're getting the bargain of a century if they get a majority stake in Sprint for 12 billion... IF they pump money into Sprint's assets and network and revolutionize it with the grocery bags full of money Sprint needs!

 

My dark little heart skipped a beat when I saw this headline this morning... but hey, Sprint's legacy is more guaranteed if this happens. Or, perhaps it creates a bidding war for Sprint?

 

Who would be bidding? Verizon and AT&T aren't going to make offers. The Government's made their position pretty clear on that. A european carrier maybe? Haven't heard any rumblings about that. But then again, this sort of comes out of the blue too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone remember what SK Telecom's offer to Sprint was back when Forsee left? I seem to remember they wanted control of the board , not sure if there was every an amount attached to it. Would be interesting to compare the two.

 

Although this comment is baseless, its possible a huge investment like this would cause NV expansion into areas where iden service is being shuttered with no plans to continue cdma/lte.... it could also fund a nice expansion into areas sprint doesn't for see having cash to be at ever. To be a fly on the wall and see what Softbank has in mind for sprint...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand I think it will help increase NV deployment (probably with an influx for cash from Softbank) but on the other hand I don't know how I feel about Sprint being owned by a Japanese company. They will probably change Sprint's name to Softbank, to expand their brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would be bidding? Verizon and AT&T aren't going to make offers. The Government's made their position pretty clear on that. A european carrier maybe? Haven't heard any rumblings about that. But then again, this sort of comes out of the blue too.

 

Dish... This newco zombie that is being created... Any private equity firm. Century link also apparently had an interest in sprint at some point?

 

I personally believe that Hesse has the best poker face in the industry ... Sprint drives a very hard bargain. I am certain they anticipate other offers for mergers/investments in the wake of this news. Although others may not offer as much cash as softbank, giving away less equity in the company could be equally as attractive.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone remember what SK Telecom's offer to Sprint was back when Forsee left? I seem to remember they wanted control of the board , not sure if there was every an amount attached to it. Would be interesting to compare the two.

 

Although this comment is baseless, its possible a huge investment like this would cause NV expansion into areas where iden service is being shuttered with no plans to continue cdma/lte.... it could also fund a nice expansion into areas sprint doesn't for see having cash to be at ever. To be a fly on the wall and see what Softbank has in mind for sprint...

 

Only article I found in reference to an investment was from WSJ. It mentions that a $5 billion investment offer made by SK which was rejected by Sprint. Then they tried to work out another type of alliance.

 

http://online.wsj.co...0294655639.html

 

Sprint Nextel, SK Telecom Weigh Alliance

 

July 16, 2008

 

 

South Korea's SK Telecom Co. and U.S. wireless carrier
Sprint Nextel
Corp.
S +1.79%
are in preliminary talks to form a strategic partnership to develop new handsets and services, people familiar with the matter said.

The companies have discussed the idea of SK Telecom making a minority investment in Sprint, but they aren't discussing an outright merger, the people said. Last fall, Sprint rejected a $5 billion investment offer by SK Telecom and Providence Equity Partners.

Any investment resulting from the current talks would likely be smaller, the people said. Sprint has a market capitalization of $26 billion, roughly double SK Telecom's market capitalization of $13.8 billion.

 

I just don't really understand the need for it from Softbank's side? They're a GSM carrier in the Japan. They use a different LTE frequency (2100Mhz). They acquired another japanese carrier earlier this month who provides LTE over 1800Mhz. Don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only article I found in reference to an investment was from WSJ. It mentions that a $5 billion investment offer made by SK which was rejected by Sprint. Then they tried to work out another type of alliance.

 

http://online.wsj.co...0294655639.html

 

As I recall, SK Telecom wanted to install Tim Donahue (formerly of Nextel) in as CEO. Apparently that was a non-starter to Sprint's board for one reason or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They (Softbank) appear to want Clearwire as well. Would line up nicely with their 2.5GHz TD-LTE network in Japan I suppose: http://finance.yahoo...-122013793.html

 

Didn't find the 2500Mhz info earlier. Good to know. Still, that would explain interest in Clearwire. Why Sprint?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I recall, SK Telecom wanted to install Tim Donahue (formerly of Nextel) in as CEO. Apparently that was a non-starter to Sprint's board for one reason or another.

 

It was a non-starter because he sold them a bill of goods, a pump and dump scheme, an overcrowded network. Now of course it is the board's responsibility to check those facts out, but...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will probably change Sprint's name to Softbank, to expand their brand.

 

I should hope not. Softbank Mobile has one of the most absurd names in wireless, the equivalent of something like Bank of America Wireless or US Bank Mobile.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would there need to be technical compatibility for this to make sense? If it is a financial investment does technical compatibility really matter? If they see a chance to make a diversified financial investment in another country, can acquire a financially struggling carrier at a good price but a carrier that seems to have a strong plan for technical improvement, then why not? I don't see technical compatibility between the two countries to be an issue at all. Unlike a domestic merger where the goal is consolidation, increased leverage with suppliers, and cost reductions on the overhead side, this deal would seem to be all about an ROI on investment.

 

Didn't find the 2500Mhz info earlier. Good to know. Still, that would explain interest in Clearwire. Why Sprint?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would there need to be technical compatibility for this to make sense? If it is a financial investment does technical compatibility really matter? If they see a chance to make a diversified financial investment in another country, can acquire a financially struggling carrier at a good price but a carrier that seems to have a strong plan for technical improvement, then why not? I don't see technical compatibility between the two countries to be an issue at all. Unlike a domestic merger where the goal is consolidation, increased leverage with suppliers, and cost reductions on the overhead side, this deal would seem to be all about an ROI on investment.

 

Also remember that the yen is very strong vs the dollar so the deal in yen is much better than it could have been. Strong yen+ undervalued stock = recipe for success.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...