Jump to content

Signal issues with the galaxy nexus


rwhittaker13

Recommended Posts

Well, as i have gotten a galaxy nexus at long last, ive noticed that other sprint phones have been constantly getting better signal than my phone has. For example, when i went to the sprint store, my phone varies from 1-2 bars in the store. When i would go over to any other sprint phones, they would have at least 3-5 bars. And this was more than just one different sprint phone that did it, it was every phone in the store that had a better signal than mine, except for the galaxy nexus at the store. It had the same signal strength as mine did.. Radio issue possibly??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, as i have gotten a galaxy nexus at long last, ive noticed that other sprint phones have been constantly getting better signal than my phone has. For example, when i went to the sprint store, my phone varies from 1-2 bars in the store. When i would go over to any other sprint phones, they would have at least 3-5 bars. And this was more than just one different sprint phone that did it, it was every phone in the store that had a better signal than mine, except for the galaxy nexus at the store. It had the same signal strength as mine did.. Radio issue possibly??

 

Did you look at the actual signal numbers? Or just the bars? There is nothing scientific about the bars.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you look at the actual signal numbers? Or just the bars? There is nothing scientific about the bars.

Yes, i have looked at the dBm values. At times, the difference between my value and other sprint phones values ranged from a 4 to 10 dBm difference. When one sprint phone would have a -93dBm signal strength, mine would be around -105 to -109dBm signal strength.. I can not figure out why this happens Edited by rwhittaker13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, i have looked at the dBm values. At times, the difference between my value and other sprint phones values ranged from a 4 to 10 dBm difference. When one sprint phone would have a -93dBm signal strength, mine would be around -105 to -109dBm signal strength.. I can not figure out why this happens

 

It is possible that the nexus has a slightly weaker radio... I have noticed slightly improved signal strength numbers and bars since going from the gnex to the gs3, but I have not noticed additional coverage area due to the "better" signal strength. There are a couple places that I occasionally visit that I would drop calls and/or have no signal with the gnex, and the GS3 behaves the same in those areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the problem seems to be that the Galaxy Nexus uses an off brand VIA Telecom baseband for its CDMA2000 chipset. Honestly, this late in the game, I do not know why you would want to pick up a Galaxy Nexus.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the problem seems to be that the Galaxy Nexus uses an off brand VIA Telecom baseband for its CDMA2000 chipset. Honestly, this late in the game, I do not know why you would want to pick up a Galaxy Nexus.

 

AJ

Because of my broken LG Viper, sprint said they would replace my phone with a different model and the galaxy nexus was the other model i could choose to replace the viper with, so i did. Not a bad phone really, it still lives up to its name.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Galaxy Nexus has the weakest 1x/EVDO radio performance of all Sprint LTE devices I've tested. On par with one of the weakest devices of all time...the Samsung Epic 4G.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Galaxy Nexus has the weakest 1x/EVDO radio performance of all Sprint LTE devices I've tested. On par with one of the weakest devices of all time...the Samsung Epic 4G.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Full agreement there..

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

finally got something helpful....

 

Sometimes it helps to be a HAM radio licensee..:) I worked my way up to a level 3 escalation on the airave where i had sprint and airvana directly involved. It turns out there is a known issue with the airvana 2.5 and andriod LTE devices. the phones try to query the airvana for LTE which fails...the phone then de-registers from the airave and then recycles on 3g and connects. Things are fine until the phone tries to find 4G at the airave again..rinse repeat. This only affects the 2.5 AFAIK. The solution is to disable 4g and lock the phone into 3g when on the airave. I've also noticed the signal the 2.5 is throwing out is very hot. I live in a 2200 sqft house but i had to have them turn it down to 1500sqft to keep the rest of the phones from getting blasted off the air as well.(google receiver rf detuning). Airvana now has an active ticket on this inssue internally on their end as well...here's to hoping this will get fixed now. I've now got the reduced power and the 4G disabled on my GNEX. I'll report back with the results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

well the issue has accelerated. my gnex now drops the airvana completely on a regular basis. it appears either sprint or the device itself keeps jacking the rf output up to high and that's blasting phones off the airvana again. What a piece of junk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

according to sprint on the airave when the system polls for 4g the airave can and does often drop the device that did the 4g poll while connected to the airave. it having a via chipset explains quite a bit on my signal issues.

 

I don't believe that at all unless maybe it picks up a fringe LTE signal that is unusable.

 

Just not the way it works. Kinda like saying your phone will drop the 1x connection to scan for EVDO.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's what i been told by more than one level 3 airave technician. My symptoms and further research bear that out. Various sprint forums have multiple threads on multiple Android phones and the 2.5. i even have an offer from Sprint airave tech support that if i can find a 2.0 on ebay up to a certain amount all i have to do is grab it, send them proof of purchase and they'll credit my account for the purchase. i just called back this morning and that offer is legit...so it's a major issue that's just being kept under wraps right now. Here's to hoping sprint gets this fixed right quick. You can't get more definitive than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe that at all unless maybe it picks up a fringe LTE signal that is unusable.

 

Just not the way it works. Kinda like saying your phone will drop the 1x connection to scan for EVDO.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

I will rephrase..when the phone polls for 4g while connected to the airave the airave can and usually does drop the device doing the polling especially if the device is andriod based...it's due to a bug in the firmware of the airave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

This thread explains my signal frustration. Anyone else's Gnex get exceptionally hot on the top half of the phone? Pretty much any activity is causing my phone to get really hot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread explains my signal frustration. Anyone else's Gnex get exceptionally hot on the top half of the phone? Pretty much any activity is causing my phone to get really hot.

 

Yep. All the time. I'm taking mine in tomorrow, and as soon as I get the replacement, I'm selling it on ebay to subsidize the cost of my new iPhone 5. Good thing I kept my EVO Shift around for something, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...