Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Boston Market (all of Massachusetts)


brendan4t

Recommended Posts

Thanks. Would it be reasonable to assume that since the site in question has not yet been upgraded at all (GMO or otherwise) that it will probably get the full upgrade? Since it isn't "early."

 

Sure, that is reasonable. Especially if it doesn't seem to be a site that has any quirky engineering needs.

 

I don't know the GMO progress for the Boston market, but I know GMO work in the VT/NH/ME market is well underway, if not nearly finished. Boston is a first-round market; VT/NH/ME is 4th round on the schedule. The trend has been to do the GMO work first.

 

As of earlier this month, 80% of sites in the Boston market have at least one accepted upgrade, and 50% of the LTE sites have been accepted. Accepted does not necessarily mean its broadcasting to the public, but the work is done. LTE sites usually go online fairly quickly, but 3G upgrades are activated in clusters.

 

More importantly, remember: only about 100 sites nationwide will not be getting LTE! Robert's very educated estimate is that most of these locations are in very rural areas out west. And I think he meant much further west than the Berkshires. ;)

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cinnamngrl,

 

Thanks again for reaching out to me.  I took a look at the notes on the 

Tower.  It looks like the Techs working on it had to shut it down to 

replace multiple parts.  They have not posted an ETA for us yet, but I 

will keep checking for you.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

KC

Sprint Social Care

 

 

 

 

Original Message Follows:

------------------------

On saturday someone called me but they were unable to fix the problem 

and now it is getting worse.  they said that the ticket was escalated 

but I haven't heard from anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's lousy, but at least you got an update about what was going on! Much better to know there is a tower outage instead if thinking this is what your expectation of coverage will be.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like Sprint is getting ready to officially launch additional areas of the Masachusetts market, including

  • Fitchburg, Mass
  • Leominster, Mass
  • Springfield, Mass
  • Worcester, Mass

There's still a lot of work going on. All this means is that these areas have reach the 40% POPs coverage mark that Sprint is apparently using to launch markets.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am getting insane upload speeds just outside of Boston in Dedham right now! Just did a few tests got a low of 61Mbps and a high of 138Mbps! I don't know what sprint did here, if they are testing something, but this is absolutely crazy! My normal speeds here are about 25 down and 10 up.

 

I'll upload a screen shot later tonight after work of my results tab.  :D  :D  :D  :D  :D  :D  :D

 

EDIT: Decided to just upload the picture while I have a second!

 

ojU4xMx.png

Edited by taubut
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am getting insane upload speeds just outside of Boston in Dedham right now! Just did a few tests got a low of 61Mbps and a high of 138Mbps! I don't know what sprint did here, if they are testing something, but this is absolutely crazy! My normal speeds here are about 25 down and 10 up.

 

I'll upload a screen shot later tonight after work of my results tab. :D:D:D:D:D:D:D

 

EDIT: Decided to just upload the picture while I have a second!

 

Posted Image

Something is funky here. Either speedtest was misreporting the results or the pic is doctored. Sprints network configuration is not physically capable of those results.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something is funky here. Either speedtest was misreporting the results or the pic is doctored. Sprints network configuration is not physically capable of those results.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Well the image isnt doctored, I also took a screen shot of each and every speed test after doing them. Figured the results page would just be easier to see them all at once. So maybe there is something wrong with the app, but I also tried rebooting my phone, turning off 4G and turning it back on. I probably should test it with sensorly too. So tomorrow while at work if speed test is producing similar results I'll test it and see what happens. Just figured I would post these while I was getting the speeds, wasn't sure if there was some thing they were testing. Guess I was a bit over excited about seeing the numbers, also because it seemed to stay consistent, it wasn't just a single odd result and then back to normal.

 

Anyway, you can call me a phony if you want, its just what I was getting. I'm using a GS4 on Cyanogenmod for reference, so if somebody has insight to maybe that being the cause let me know.

 

EDIT: Tomorrow I'll be on my iPhone 5 that I normally carry, so I'll see what happens with that.

Edited by taubut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the image isnt doctored, I also took a screen shot of each and every speed test after doing them. Figured the results page would just be easier to see them all at once. So maybe there is something wrong with the app, but I also tried rebooting my phone, turning off 4G and turning it back on. I probably should test it with sensorly too. So tomorrow while at work if speed test is producing similar results I'll test it and see what happens. Just figured I would post these while I was getting the speeds, wasn't sure if there was some thing they were testing. Guess I was a bit over excited about seeing the numbers, also because it seemed to stay consistent, it wasn't just a single odd result and then back to normal.

 

Anyway, you can call me a phony if you want, its just what I was getting. I'm using a GS4 on Cyanogenmod for reference, so if somebody has insight to maybe that being the cause let me know.

 

EDIT: Tomorrow I'll be on my iPhone 5 that I normally carry, so I'll see what happens with that.

I don't think your a phony, the speedtest app was probably getting a great connection and just over-reported the numbers. Try different speedtest servers and see how the tests compare. You probably did have a great LTE connection, but the true speeds were closer to 20-30 mb.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I've got my iPhone 5 today at work instead of the S4. Getting more normal LTE speeds, only did a single test so far but the speed was 21.34 down and 5.38 up. So I'm not sure what was going on yesterday, I had a -87 for signal on the S4 today I have a have signal jumping from -92 to -107. So my S4 had much better connectivity than the iPhone but that still doesnt explain the insane speeds. Like Mike said though the app probably just over-reported the numbers and it should have shown much lower. What I can tell you though is I tried uploading some files and it was pretty quick haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed that Sprint is turning on channel 476.

 

First time my EVO 4G LTE has had great coverage at home :)

What does this mean? I'm assuming since you have a evo lte that it does not mean 2.5 ghz td lte right?

 

Turning on channel 476 from recent acquisition of Clearwire?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed that Sprint is turning on channel 476.

 

First time my EVO 4G LTE has had great coverage at home :)

Where is home? What are you using to find out the channel?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does this mean? I'm assuming since you have a evo lte that it does not mean 2.5 ghz td lte right?

 

Turning on channel 476 from recent acquisition of Clearwire?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

No, channel 476 is in the ESMR band.  Now that nextel is shut, they've started to broadcast a lot more w/ 1x advanced on ESMR (old nextel).

 

This means much better coverage for voice.

 

##DEBUG# on the dialer if you are using an evo - you can see what channel you are on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, 476 is the 800 SMR channel.  FYI, SignalCheck will show you if you're on 800 also.

 

The stock Sprint PRLs will not actively look for an 800MHz signal.  You'll stay on 1900MHz unless it loses that signal.  Custom PRLs can force your device to prioritize 800.  There are a lot of 800 sites active in the suburbs northwest of Boston.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, 476 is the 800 SMR channel. FYI, SignalCheck will show you if you're on 800 also.

 

The stock Sprint PRLs will not actively look for an 800MHz signal. You'll stay on 1900MHz unless it loses that signal. Custom PRLs can force your device to prioritize 800. There are a lot of 800 sites active in the suburbs northwest of Boston.

 

-Mike

The stock Android ones will scan for 800SMR first but will not make additional efforts to jump from PCS to SMR unless needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...