Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - South Texas Market (Corpus Christi/Laredo/Rio Grande Valley)


bluemustangjosh

Recommended Posts

Any updates on the Mcallen/Edinburg area?

 

They have started deployment over the entire Lower Rio Grande Valley. Sites will come online one at a time when each is complete.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh! I want LTE!!!! Its like Sprint is hitting the mini populated areas in the Valley and is afraid to hit the Pharr/McAllen/Edinburg area. Crowded as heck!!! I think I saw in Sensorly that even La Villa is getting some coverage. I'm holding my breath and I'm turning blue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh! I want LTE!!!! Its like Sprint is hitting the mini populated areas in the Valley and is afraid to hit the Pharr/McAllen/Edinburg area. Crowded as heck!!! I think I saw in Sensorly that even La Villa is getting some coverage. I'm holding my breath and I'm turning blue.

Sprint is upgrading its entire network in the South Texas market. Each site is worked on the moment it's ready. Permitting/zoning varies by city and county, as well as backhaul availability can vary by site.

 

Sprint is not selecting areas it prefers, since it upgrading every site. When a site is ready, they'll send people right over to work on it. If you area has not started yet, then your city/county probably is slower on approvals, or the local backhaul vendor is slower, or a combination thereof.

 

But do not sorry, it is indeed coming. And they will not leave the South Texas market until they're all done.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is upgrading its entire network in the South Texas market. Each site is worked on the moment it's ready. Permitting/zoning varies by city and county, as well as backhaul availability can vary by site.

 

Sprint is not selecting areas it prefers, since it upgrading every site. When a site is ready, they'll send people right over to work on it. If you area has not started yet, then your city/county probably is slower on approvals, or the local backhaul vendor is slower, or a combination thereof.

 

But do not sorry, it is indeed coming. And they will not leave the South Texas market until they're all done.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

I might show my age with this creation but oh well....  this always pops in my head.

 

WANTLTE.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh! I want LTE!!!! Its like Sprint is hitting the mini populated areas in the Valley and is afraid to hit the Pharr/McAllen/Edinburg area. Crowded as heck!!! I think I saw in Sensorly that even La Villa is getting some coverage. I'm holding my breath and I'm turning blue.

I wouldn't call Harlingen or Brownsville mini populated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wouldn't say it's as populated as the McAllen/Edinburg/Mission/Pharr area.

Which still doesn't make it mini populated. Brownsville is the largest city in the valley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wouldn't say it's as populated as the McAllen/Edinburg/Mission/Pharr area.

 

Which still doesn't make it mini populated. Brownsville is the largest city in the valley.

Regardless of population, we're all getting LTE

 

 

Sent from my iPhone5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got LTE signal at the Regional Hospital on 83, Ridge Rd and 2nd 

 

First I've heard of LTE in McAllen. It must be the tower on top of Inter National Bank on Ridge/E. Savannah. If you want, you can download the Sensorly app to help identify if indeed its that tower. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After 15 years on Sprint, I am about ready to jump ship.  For the past several months, network coverage (and any speed) has gotten worse and worse.  I had hoped it was because a network upgrade was in progress.  Whatever it is... if I didn't have wifi access in most places that I use my phone, it would be useless.  In fact, I could use a wifi only tablet with the same useability.

 

I live in Mission/McAllen area, but spent the past week on South Padre Island.  This week, the network was only intermittently available, and sometimes took multiple tries to make a phone call.  During calls, the connection would come and go.  In fact, I lost the call twice during a discussion with Sprint.  They stated that there was no known problem in the area at the time.  As I said, this was during the weekdays and the weekend.

Is Sprint a dead (or dying) carrier?  How do they keep customers in this area?  15 years ago, Sprint was a fantastic provider in the Rio Grande Valley.

 

For those that have access to the technical details of any upgrades or tower specifics... can you explain what is going on?  Has the growth of network usage simply outgrown the use in the area?  In areas like South Padre Island, how could it be great a month ago, and almost unuseable now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After 15 years on Sprint, I am about ready to jump ship. For the past several months, network coverage (and any speed) has gotten worse and worse. I had hoped it was because a network upgrade was in progress. Whatever it is... if I didn't have wifi access in most places that I use my phone, it would be useless. In fact, I could use a wifi only tablet with the same useability.

 

I live in Mission/McAllen area, but spent the past week on South Padre Island. This week, the network was only intermittently available, and sometimes took multiple tries to make a phone call. During calls, the connection would come and go. In fact, I lost the call twice during a discussion with Sprint. They stated that there was no known problem in the area at the time. As I said, this was during the weekdays and the weekend.

 

Is Sprint a dead (or dying) carrier? How do they keep customers in this area? 15 years ago, Sprint was a fantastic provider in the Rio Grande Valley.

 

For those that have access to the technical details of any upgrades or tower specifics... can you explain what is going on? Has the growth of network usage simply outgrown the use in the area? In areas like South Padre Island, how could it be great a month ago, and almost unuseable now?

 

The network is now being upgraded in your market. Voice, 3G and LTE is being worked on. After so many years, it would be tragic to leave now that work is under way. Sprint is also installing 800MHz too, which will have the signal be stronger, penetrate into buildings better and travel farther.

 

You will see some improvements as soon as the next week or two. And it will get incrementally better every week. LTE will pop up in more and more places. All sites will likely be upgraded in 6-8 months throughout the South Texas market.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the information.  I hope that they start 'turning on' some of these upgrades.

What causes the significant degradation in some areas (like South Padre Island)?  Is there a way (application) that can be used to see what is going on?  Is there less overall bandwidth available from time to time, or is it simply a function of how many people are using the network?

 

The network is now being upgraded in your market. Voice, 3G and LTE is being worked on. After so many years, it would be tragic to leave now that work is under way. Sprint is also installing 800MHz too, which will have the signal be stronger, penetrate into buildings better and travel farther.

You will see some improvements as soon as the next week or two. And it will get incrementally better every week. LTE will pop up in more and more places. All sites will likely be upgraded in 6-8 months throughout the South Texas market.

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The network is now being upgraded in your market. Voice, 3G and LTE is being worked on. After so many years, it would be tragic to leave now that work is under way. Sprint is also installing 800MHz too, which will have the signal be stronger, penetrate into buildings better and travel farther.

 

You will see some improvements as soon as the next week or two. And it will get incrementally better every week. LTE will pop up in more and more places. All sites will likely be upgraded in 6-8 months throughout the South Texas market.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

I read on the 800MHz thread that we are not getting 800MHz because we are too close to the Mexican border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read on the 800MHz thread that we are not getting 800MHz because we are too close to the Mexican border.

 

In the RGV, there will not be 800MHz initially.  That's true.  Sprint and the FCC are still working through that with the Mexican Feds and their SMR band license holder.  It will not likely be resolved in 2013.  However, parts of the South Texas market away from the border, like Corpus Christi, Kingsville, Alice, Victoria, etc. will start to receive 800MHz deployments this year.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I read on the 800MHz thread that we are not getting 800MHz because we are too close to the Mexican border.

 

 

In the RGV, there will not be 800MHz initially. That's true. Sprint and the FCC are still working through that with the Mexican Feds and their SMR band license holder. It will not likely be resolved in 2013. However, parts of the South Texas market away from the border, like Corpus Christi, Kingsville, Alice, Victoria, etc. will start to receive 800MHz deployments this year.

 

Robert

Is sprint and the FCC also working with the canadian feds to work out the 800 MHz issue and the SMR band license holders?

 

Sent from my HP Touchpad using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I read on the 800MHz thread that we are not getting 800MHz because we are too close to the Mexican border.

 

 

 

 

In the RGV, there will not be 800MHz initially. That's true. Sprint and the FCC are still working through that with the Mexican Feds and their SMR band license holder. It will not likely be resolved in 2013. However, parts of the South Texas market away from the border, like Corpus Christi, Kingsville, Alice, Victoria, etc. will start to receive 800MHz deployments this year.

 

 

 

Robert

Is sprint and the FCC also working with the canadian feds to work out the 800 MHz issue and the SMR band license holders?

 

 

 

Sent from my HP Touchpad using Tapatalk 2

 

 

 

 

Supposedly so. I know Sprint wants them to. However, we are talking about two separate federal governments here.

 

On the US side, the FCC is very motivated because Americans need and can put to use this spectrum for wideband use. However, the Canadian and Mexican governments don't have the same urgency because their SMR license holders along the borders do not have eminent wideband plans, thus are not pushing their governments.

 

The current agreement is for interleaved 25khz channels shared between the American and Foreign carriers. If they are not prepared to move to wideband in Mexico or Canada, how do you share border spectrum of wideband and narrowband? You pretty much can't.

 

And if they are ready and willing to go to wideband, then they have to organize how they are going to split it up. The carriers on the other side may have a larger or smaller chunk of SMR spectrum. It could get very messy trying to line up and divvy it up fairly. No matter how you slice it, it's a messy proposition and Sprint is only going to be able to use at best half of its border SMR spectrum.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supposedly so. I know Sprint wants them to. However, we are talking about two separate federal governments here.

 

On the US side, the FCC is very motivated because Americans need and can put to use this spectrum for wideband use. However, the Canadian and Mexican governments don't have the same urgency because their SMR license holders along the borders do not have eminent wideband plans, thus are not pushing their governments.

 

The current agreement is for interleaved 25khz channels shared between the American and Foreign carriers. If they are not prepared to move to wideband in Mexico or Canada, how do you share border spectrum of wideband and narrowband? You pretty much can't.

 

And if they are ready and willing to go to wideband, then they have to organize how they are going to split it up. The carriers on the other side may have a larger or smaller chunk of SMR spectrum. It could get very messy trying to line up and divvy it up fairly. No matter how you slice it, it's a messy proposition and Sprint is only going to be able to use at best half of its border SMR spectrum.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

I understand what you mean.  Like you said if Mexican and Canadian SMR license holders do not have plans for deploying wideband services its going to be hard to push them to speed us this process to benefit both parties.

 

I did find this picture of the proposed new 800 MHz US-Mexico reband plan.  I am curious in the picture what does "Co-Primary" mean?  With the post-reband plan of 5.5 MHz x 5.5 MHz available in the 818.5 to 824 MHz range, I wonder if Sprint could deploy a 3x3 LTE carrier and a CDMA carrier. 

 

Article on US-Mexico new 800 MHz reband plan

http://psc.apcointl.org/2013/04/02/new-800-mhz-band-plan-for-u-s-mexico-sharing-zone/

 

 

Post-reband 800 MHz band pic

http://psc.apcointl.org/wp-content/uploads/BandPlan.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...