Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Shentel Market (Shenandoah Valley/Hagerstown/Harrisburg)


Boosted20V

Recommended Posts

Between this one and the one behind Lowes, yes.

 

Expect more, especially in Winchester.

Winchester has been brutally bad lately. I had to switch to 3G at the Apple Blossom Mall to get usable data.

 

Edit: I have an appt in Winchester tomorrow so I can check a couple more towers up there.

 

Sent from my Note 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winchester has been brutally bad lately. I had to switch to 3G at the Apple Blossom Mall to get usable data.

 

Edit: I have an appt in Winchester tomorrow so I can check a couple more towers up there.

 

Sent from my Note 4

 

I'm surprised about the Mall. Shentel has a small cell in there near their (Sprint branded) store.

 

No more 10 MHz FDD except Woodstock for now. That is brand new this week. First ALU equipment to do it I think.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had my engineering screen active all the way from Woodstock to near the Winchester Hospital area today. I didn't find any other 10x10. I didn't get to check that other tower you mentioned yesterday, but I should be able to get there sometime tomorrow or this weekend to confirm it.

 

Sent from my Note 4

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the first time since I found out 10x10 is live on my "home" tower last week, I noticed my work phone was on the primary carrier (5x5) and my personal phone was on the secondary (10x10). I took the opportunity to compare the speeds. I just did this at 8:30am so the towers are under some load, but I wouldn't say this is peak usage time.

 

5x5 carrier: 7.44 down, 5.75 up

10x10 carrier: 18.39 down, 18.85 up.

 

It is quite a difference.

 

Interestingly enough, I noticed as soon as the speed test was done, my work phone then bounced to B26, then to the B25 2nd carrier. I've noticed both my phones seem to prefer using the 2nd carrier since it was made 10x10, which makes sense. The carrier balancing seems to take that into consideration.

 

 

 

Sent from my Note 4

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Carlisle PA - not familiar with your guys area but showing EARFCN of 8334. Didn't see that reported on here.

 

That is a 5 MHz LTE channel in the PCS B band. Carlisle is in the Philadelphia MTA, so the channels are different than Woodstock which is PCS A in the BAWA MTA. 8158 is the normal PCA A band 5 MHz channel and 8133 is the 10 MHz channel.  I haven't heard of any PCS B band 10 MHz channel yet for Shentel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5x5 carrier: 7.44 down, 5.75 up

10x10 carrier: 18.39 down, 18.85 up.

 

Nice. A 10 MHz channel should theoretically peak at about 60 and a 5 MHz one at around 30. The highest I've seen on a 5 MHz channel is 27ish so I would expect peak in-the-field throughputs of around 54 for the 10 MHz channel. You'd have to in an extremely good SINR area to see speeds like that though and of course loading matters too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice. A 10 MHz channel should theoretically peak at about 60 and a 5 MHz one at around 30. The highest I've seen on a 5 MHz channel is 27ish so I would expect peak in-the-field throughputs of around 54 for the 10 MHz channel. You'd have to in an extremely good SINR area to see speeds like that though and of course loading matters too.

Theoretically iirc it's 36.7 dl for a 5 mhz FDD and 72.2 dl for 10 mhz FDD using 2x2 at UE.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJM,

 

Do you know if Shentel will have to sacrifice some CDMA to accommodate the larger 10x10 carrier, or do they have enough spectrum to just add to it without sacrificing CDMA carriers?

 

Sent from my Note 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJM,

 

Do you know if Shentel will have to sacrifice some CDMA to accommodate the larger 10x10 carrier, or do they have enough spectrum to just add to it without sacrificing CDMA carriers?

 

Sent from my Note 4

The minimum cdma buffer for all markets is 10x10 total of PCS or around 5-6 cdma carriers worth of spectrum. Anything else is on the cutting board to be refarmed to LTE.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJM,

 

Do you know if Shentel will have to sacrifice some CDMA to accommodate the larger 10x10 carrier, or do they have enough spectrum to just add to it without sacrificing CDMA carriers?

 

Sent from my Note 4

 

I think the PCS A and B bands are 15 MHz wide each. If 10 MHz is devoted to LTE, the remaining bandwidth can support exactly four CDMA carriers. However, I believe there are guard bands so realistically this is only three CDMA carriers. If I had to guess I would say they are using one PCS voice carrier and two EVDO carriers plus the 800 MHz voice carrier.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Network Statistics at 9/30/15
 
548 Cell Sites
 
93% have a second LTE carrier at 800 MHz
 
187 sites have three carriers, including a second carrier at 1900 MHz
 
Traffic
 
89% of data traffic is on LTE, with 33% on 800 MHz
 
Data usage grew 11% in Q3’15
 
Average
speeds of approximately
4 Mbps
 
Average customer uses approximately 4 GB per month
 
Dropped calls
-
0.5%
 
Blocked calls
-
0.3%

 

source: http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/SHEN/942950566x0x857622/2F625FC9-200D-4A64-A9B2-F065536DDBD0/SHEN_Earnings_Call_Q3_2015_v6_-_Final.pdf

 

extra credit: http://seekingalpha.com/article/3625856-shenandoahs-shen-ceo-christopher-french-on-q3-2015-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what happened last night or if anything changed at all because of the whole WiMax ruling, but I woke up this morning to faster LTE speeds than usual. For several months while at my home I was unable to get speeds over 2 mbps on LTE. Then about 3 weeks to a month ago I was pulling about 4-5 mbps at home.

 

This morning I woke up and my WiFI wasn't working so when I started scrolling through Instagram on LTE it was loading everything MUCH faster. I ran a speed test and I was getting between 15-18 mbps down and 4-7 mbps up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screenshot 2015 11 06 17 30 02

 

Found this today at 39.97188, -76.78632. I was able to pull 35 Mbps consistently from it. This is the first B41 in Shentel's network as far as I know. I am sure more will follow very soon!

 

What is up with that UL Channel? That must be a bug. The phone is a Samsung S5.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Found this today at 39.97188, -76.78632. I was able to pull 35 Mbps consistently from it. This is the first B41 in Shentel's network as far as I know. I am sure more will follow very soon!

 

What is up with that UL Channel? That must be a bug. The phone is a Samsung S5.

 

 

Android gets confused at times due to downlink and uplink being on the same frequency for TDD with the difference being time allocated for DL or UL. So when it's doing one or the other it tends to put a null value since it doesn't know what to report for EARFCN since both are the same and one is inactive. 

 

Also 41176 is typically the 2nd B41 carrier EARFCN. 40978 would be the first so off the bat it looks like 2 Band 41 carriers live if the shentel site follows the standard Sprint pattern. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Android gets confused at times due to downlink and uplink being on the same frequency for TDD with the difference being time allocated for DL or UL. So when it's doing one or the other it tends to put a null value since it doesn't know what to report for EARFCN since both are the same and one is inactive. 

 

Also 41176 is typically the 2nd B41 carrier EARFCN. 40978 would be the first so off the bat it looks like 2 Band 41 carriers live if the shentel site follows the standard Sprint pattern. 

 

I can confirm those are the two carriers on the nearby site.

 

I am pretty sure the licenses exist to have five carriers in the Harrisburg/York area. I believe the hardware is limited to two right now. Regardless the bandwidth is going from 30 to 70 overnight with two TDD carriers. They will soon be aggregated so things are going to be interesting when RootMetrics comes back around 1H 2016.

 

Fortunately Shentel is expanding it's fiber network into PA, so it will be a lot more cost effective for them to deliver the big FTTT backhaul to support the throughput on the air link.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can confirm those are the two carriers on the nearby site.

 

I am pretty sure the licenses exist to have five carriers in the Harrisburg/York area. I believe the hardware is limited to two right now. Regardless the bandwidth is going from 30 to 70 overnight with two TDD carriers. They will soon be aggregated so things are going to be interesting when RootMetrics comes back around 1H 2016.

 

Fortunately Shentel is expanding it's fiber network into PA, so it will be a lot more cost effective for them to deliver the big FTTT backhaul to support the throughput on the air link.

Software limits the hardware to two. The next one should be located on earfcn 41374 as that would be the next adjacent 20 MHz continuous spectrum to the existing 40 mhz continuous. That is if they hold the spectrum for it.

 

Any more than 3 you're looking at high capacity setups and split sectors.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Just came home for the holidays. Noticed a significant improvement in coverage. My house has an airave because we used to have 1 bar of 3g... But now I am full bars LTE at home on b25.

 

Guess we don't need the airave anymore

 

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

 

Do you mind sharing your approximate location such as a nearby intersection? I'm glad to hear progress is being made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...