Jump to content

Any way to identify a small cell using Field Test mode on an iPhone?


Brad The Beast

Recommended Posts

A good rule of thumb is PCI > 400 is highly likely to be a small cell or mini macro of some type.

PCI > 480 is usually a femto cell class device like an Airave 3 or a Magic box. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, lilotimz said:

A good rule of thumb is PCI > 400 is highly likely to be a small cell or mini macro of some type.

PCI > 480 is usually a femto cell class device like an Airave 3 or a Magic box. 

We have lots of macros in Seattle with PCIs up to 440. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

We have lots of macros in Seattle with PCIs up to 440. 

Very true. I've noticed some in my market as well. Though generally speaking it's a good rule of thumb. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Flompholph said:

So there is no more cell identity on the iphone anymore? That used to equal gci when converted.

There is. Oftentimes the fields just take a while to populate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Flompholph said:

So there is no more cell identity on the iphone anymore? That used to equal gci when converted.

 

10 hours ago, RAvirani said:

There is. Oftentimes the fields just take a while to populate. 

Yup. On Intel devices it should be under LTE > Serving Cell Meas > phy_cell_id I believe.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brad The Beast said:

earfcns I got are: 8109, 8109, 8775 and, 8109.  

Not a small cell. That's likely a new macro. 8109 is a typical 5x5 L1900 A block carrier and 8775 is the 3x3 L800 carrier by the canadian border. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

Not a small cell. That's likely a new macro. 8109 is a typical 5x5 L1900 A block carrier and 8775 is the 3x3 L800 carrier by the canadian border. 

Quite curious as to where they could be. I know where one of them is but not the other three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, belusnecropolis said:

Find signal
drive until -75
Take pics
????
Profit

I know where all the macros in town are. I have no idea where these new ones would be. It's a town of 50,000 so there's no high capacity sites. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brad The Beast said:

I know where all the macros in town are. I have no idea where these new ones would be. It's a town of 50,000 so there's no high capacity sites. 

Sorry until signal RSRP reads -75 dBm, not speeds, if that was what you were after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...