Jump to content

Any way to identify a small cell using Field Test mode on an iPhone?


Brad The Beast

Recommended Posts

A good rule of thumb is PCI > 400 is highly likely to be a small cell or mini macro of some type.

PCI > 480 is usually a femto cell class device like an Airave 3 or a Magic box. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, lilotimz said:

A good rule of thumb is PCI > 400 is highly likely to be a small cell or mini macro of some type.

PCI > 480 is usually a femto cell class device like an Airave 3 or a Magic box. 

We have lots of macros in Seattle with PCIs up to 440. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

We have lots of macros in Seattle with PCIs up to 440. 

Very true. I've noticed some in my market as well. Though generally speaking it's a good rule of thumb. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Flompholph said:

So there is no more cell identity on the iphone anymore? That used to equal gci when converted.

There is. Oftentimes the fields just take a while to populate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Flompholph said:

So there is no more cell identity on the iphone anymore? That used to equal gci when converted.

 

10 hours ago, RAvirani said:

There is. Oftentimes the fields just take a while to populate. 

Yup. On Intel devices it should be under LTE > Serving Cell Meas > phy_cell_id I believe.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brad The Beast said:

earfcns I got are: 8109, 8109, 8775 and, 8109.  

Not a small cell. That's likely a new macro. 8109 is a typical 5x5 L1900 A block carrier and 8775 is the 3x3 L800 carrier by the canadian border. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

Not a small cell. That's likely a new macro. 8109 is a typical 5x5 L1900 A block carrier and 8775 is the 3x3 L800 carrier by the canadian border. 

Quite curious as to where they could be. I know where one of them is but not the other three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, belusnecropolis said:

Find signal
drive until -75
Take pics
????
Profit

I know where all the macros in town are. I have no idea where these new ones would be. It's a town of 50,000 so there's no high capacity sites. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brad The Beast said:

I know where all the macros in town are. I have no idea where these new ones would be. It's a town of 50,000 so there's no high capacity sites. 

Sorry until signal RSRP reads -75 dBm, not speeds, if that was what you were after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I was just in Greenwich, CT doing some shopping and naturally also doing some recording of cell sites in the background on Cellmapper. Specifically I was along Greenwich Ave which is the most dense part of the city. Verizon: Literally didn't work most of the time. Even though their coverage shows the entire city blanketed in 5GUW you'll only be on their nationwide 5G network or LTE if you're anywhere south of Lewis St. Regular 5G (non C-band) didn't work at all. I don't mean it was slow, I mean it didn't pass any data at all. When I opened Instagram it told me "No connection". In a store I was in I even overheard someone asking another shopper if they had service in the store. I immediately knew they were on Verizon. Switching to LTE gave me data although it was slow. In most stores I'd get speeds in the low teens, outside it'd go up to 40Mbps. Above Lewis St. my phone finally connected to n77. On n77 I was seeing ~180Mbps. It seems like the issue isn't backhaul, it's just that Verizon doesn't have any remaining capacity on the LTE side.   AT&T: AT&T was slow but didn't suffer from the same "No data connection" issue that Verizon did. Speeds were in the low teens most of the time and peaked around 50Mbps. My phone hopped between AT&T's nationwide 5G and LTE frequently much like Verizon. Also just like Verizon, north of Lewis St. I suddenly connected to 5G+ which gave me speeds just over 100Mbps. AT&T also at least one small cell along Greenwich Ave for additional capacity and coverage and it's doing wonders for their network in the area. I'd go as far as saying it's probably the only reason they're not in the same situation as Verizon.   T-Mobile: Not to sound like an ad for the company but I was really blown away by T-Mobile's performance here. T-Mobile is collocated on the same towers as Verizon and AT&T in the region but they have an extra site in the steeple a church along Greenwich Ave that they've upgraded with n41. As a result, T-Mobile not only has the strongest signal indoors and outdoors, they also have the fastest speeds by a long shot. Nowhere along the commercial strip did I drop below 500Mbps. Indoors I was seeing over 300Mbps and outdoors I peaked at over 600Mbps. For the sake of testing I switched my phone to LTE and saw speeds of 180Mbps indoors.  
    • This site, along with T-Mobile eNB 307360, don't have B41 live, but do have n41 live. Seems like the latest T-Mobile convert sites don't broadcast B41 at all.
    • Sprint eNB 9493/5784 -> T-Mobile eNB 216213 Located at: 40.61611028489374, -74.01141959254353 Sprint eNB 6786 is converted but not live Located at: 40.647096399275, -73.97984672978991  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...