Jump to content

LG G5 User Thread (LG-LS992)


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

3xCA was enabled via profile update. That was a simple switch that didn't require a full OS update.

A zombie eating dinner I'm telling you that was too much for me to type thank you very much for saying that

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I spotted 3xCA a few days before the Inauguration here in DC on the one tower I've seen with third carrier.

 

- Trip

Did you actually get 50% faster speeds than CA?

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Confimed ZV9, updated after work. Unless/until Sprint says otherwise it just appears to be a security patch from November to January 1st. Kernel version/everything else on the software screen shows the same between mine and my wife's G5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't do speed tests (3GB plan shared with my wife) so I wouldn't know. But the proof is here:

 

http://imgur.com/kwOBG9k

 

- Trip

The site is ready for 3xCA but the network may not be ready. Our 8T8r sites in Columbus are that way, but their performance has dropped dramatically with tested sites only offering performance typical of one carrier. Same phone and location will show no difference between CA and 3xCA. CA on Mini Macro sites (former Clear) easily outperforms them and are basically holding our network together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The site is ready for 3xCA but the network may not be ready. Our 8T8r sites in Columbus are that way, but their performance has dropped dramatically with tested sites only offering performance typical of one carrier. Same phone and location will show no difference between CA and 3xCA. CA on Mini Macro sites (former Clear) easily outperforms them and are basically holding our network together.

 

The engineering screen is in the background.  It has a PCC and two SCCs.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The engineering screen is in the background. It has a PCC and two SCCs.

 

- Trip

Reread my first sentence in the last post [emoji6]

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reread my first sentence in the last post [emoji6]

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

 

I'm confused.  You must mean something different from what I think you mean; I thought you were referencing the fact that I was connected to sector 43 but hadn't noticed the SCC line at the bottom.  What do you mean then?

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our sites are ready for 3xCA like yours (three pcis/earfcns), but the Sprint network is NOT 3xCA because there is no increase in speed using a 3xCA device compared a CA device. Performance improvement should be approximately 50%.

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our sites are ready for 3xCA like yours (three pcis/earfcns), but the Sprint network is NOT 3xCA because there is no increase in speed using a 3xCA device compared a CA device. Performance improvement should be approximately 50%.

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

 

On the sites I have tested here (Springfield) the speeds are the same as 2xCA was. On a certain site I would almost always get around 100Mbps. With 3xCA, I am still getting around or just below 100Mbps. It's clearly greater than one carrier, but there was no boost from the 2xCA speeds. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be an odd question, but its something I'd been noticing both before and after this latest Feb/ZV9 update, probably a Nougat thing (I don't remember ever experiencing it prior to the Nougat update):  does anyone else run into an issue where, for example (and my example is the most typical iteration of it), you're reading something from your Google Now feed, and then you press back, and instead of going instantly back to where you were, the system has re-opened an app you previously had been accessing instead first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be an odd question, but its something I'd been noticing both before and after this latest Feb/ZV9 update, probably a Nougat thing (I don't remember ever experiencing it prior to the Nougat update):  does anyone else run into an issue where, for example (and my example is the most typical iteration of it), you're reading something from your Google Now feed, and then you press back, and instead of going instantly back to where you were, the system has re-opened an app you previously had been accessing instead first?

 

I experience that with other apps. My phone has ran like garbage since the update. I have already wiped the phone once. Since doing that wipe I have apps that randomly say they have stopped working. I can open up Instagram and it will just freeze and I have to swipe it closed then open again for it to work. Right ow Bitmoji won't open at all. Google Messenger delays sending text. When I used Textra LED notifications weren't always working. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only app I ever have the random 'stopped working' message with is my Flashlight+LED app, but then that happens without my even trying to use it or having opened it previously.  I haven't had any performance issues at all since the update either, or after the initial Nougat update for that matter, just the weird usage experience/behavior involving the back button when trying to back up to the previous screen as described above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only app I ever have the random 'stopped working' message with is my Flashlight+LED app, but then that happens without my even trying to use it or having opened it previously.  I haven't had any performance issues at all since the update either, or after the initial Nougat update for that matter, just the weird usage experience/behavior involving the back button when trying to back up to the previous screen as described above.

 

Yea I haven't been happy since the update. Already had to have one of my cameras replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My G5 is asking me to do an update.  I'm about to run out the door, so I can't run it yet.

 

- Trip

 

Yes, appears to just be Android security update patch unless/until Sprint posts otherwise...software version is now LS9932ZVA.  Sprint has nothing up yet on their website with details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing on LG either: http://www.lg.com/us/support/product-help/CT10000027-20150154886209-software-updates

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Has anyone else been experiencing issues with Google Now feeds blanking out until you reboot? It's been happening to me periodically even before the latest update so I don't think it's related to that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone else been experiencing issues with Google Now feeds blanking out until you reboot? It's been happening to me periodically even before the latest update so I don't think it's related to that.

I just had this happen to me yesterday and after I cleared Google Now and Google data / cache it worked.  My cache had built up to almost 200MB, so I'm wondering if was related.  I am on the latest May update though as well.  Nexus 6P for me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just had this happen to me yesterday and after I cleared Google Now and Google data / cache it worked.  My cache had built up to almost 200MB, so I'm wondering if was related.  I am on the latest May update though as well.  Nexus 6P for me...

Pretty sure I've tried that as well as (though not in awhile at this point) even uninstalling/reinstalling but the intermittent issue still remains. I could never tell if its a bug that got introduced at some point or some Android update/version conflict, but given your post I'm starting to feel it may be the former of the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Has anyone else been experiencing issues with Google Now feeds blanking out until you reboot? It's been happening to me periodically even before the latest update so I don't think it's related to that.

 

Wondering if this is somehow related to a memory/memory usage issue.  I inadvertently discovered that if I punch the square/'Overview' button and do a Clear All, then go back into the Google app, suddenly it will work again when this happens.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...