Jump to content

WiMax and network stress


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

I think that Clearwire's WiMax is starting to feel the heat of network stress in some areas. I just did 4 or 5 speedtests a few minutes ago and the best download speed i got with max WiMax signal was 7.2 Mbps. The strange thing is that my upload speeds were 1.5 Mbps with peaks up to 2Mbps.

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Clear isn't investing in PM to save cash. Although Sprint signed on to keep the switch on for 3 more years, I don't recall Clear saying it would keep it running at 100%. I guess I have to stop being gullible when reading press releases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7.2Mbps is still normal download speed performance.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Sprint.com:

"Users of the Sprint 4G network can expect to experience average speeds of 3Mbps to 6Mbps download and up to 1.5Mbps upload"

http://shop2.sprint.com/en/coverage/support/important_coverage_info_popup.shtml

 

7.2mb is Over what they suggest for 4G speeds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Visalia is a primary Clear market with many Clear customers. Most of my speedtests lately for 4g here have been 2 to 4 mbps. In fact, my iSpot from Clear won't go over 2.5 now.

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hit 12mbps a few weeks ago, there is a tower a few hundred feet away from me that I always get decent speeds from but its never been that fast. Its usually around 6 to 9 but it was consistently hitting 12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to wonder if some of the Sprint T1 upgrades are boosting Clearwire too

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to wonder if some of the Sprint T1 upgrades are boosting Clearwire too

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

 

Sprint's T1's do not provide enough bandwidth to help a Clearwire WiMax site one iota. Most Sprint T1's are limited to 1.5Mbps. Some ILEC's give them faster T1's...but not many.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint's T1's do not provide enough bandwidth to help a Clearwire WiMax site one iota. Most Sprint T1's are limited to 1.5Mbps. Some ILEC's give them faster T1's...but not many.

 

Robert

 

So i guess Clearwire is starting to prepare some areas for the LTE upgrades.

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i guess Clearwire is starting to prepare some areas for the LTE upgrades.

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

 

I guess that's possible. But I wouldn't bank on it.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint's T1's do not provide enough bandwidth to help a Clearwire WiMax site one iota. Most Sprint T1's are limited to 1.5Mbps. Some ILEC's give them faster T1's...but not many.

 

Robert

 

I remember thinking I was awesome because I had a T1 line in my dorm...

 

That was in 1998 though :D

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint's T1's do not provide enough bandwidth to help a Clearwire WiMax site one iota. Most Sprint T1's are limited to 1.5Mbps. Some ILEC's give them faster T1's...but not many.

 

Robert

 

If it is faster than 1.5 its no longer a T1 :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember thinking I was awesome because I had a T1 line in my dorm...

 

Your dorm had an actual T1 (DS1) line? Or your dorm had 10BASE-T Ethernet?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Your dorm had an actual T1 (DS1) line? Or your dorm had 10BASE-T Ethernet?

 

AJ

 

I guess it could have been 10BASE-T. They always referred to our connection as T1...

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why the faster LTE is lit up in markets and the EVO customers buy LTE phones and can start taking advantage of LTE speeds, the better the Wimax speeds will be for the rest of us and capacity will be relieved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is only 2-4 towers (unconfirmed) in Toledo,OH....My best was 6.7mbps. I drive and deliver med equipment, I use speed test for than 10x's a day..They have 4g in the (ghetto areas)...Wonder why ? Is there a location base for WIMAX towers ? And when they put new Network Vision crap in, will they still have 4g in those areas and not spread it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is only 2-4 towers (unconfirmed) in Toledo,OH....My best was 6.7mbps. I drive and deliver med equipment, I use speed test for than 10x's a day..They have 4g in the (ghetto areas)...Wonder why ? Is there a location base for WIMAX towers ? And when they put new Network Vision crap in, will they still have 4g in those areas and not spread it ?

 

Always wondered that as well with the wimax locations. The two towers in my metro area are in those same areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always wondered that as well with the wimax locations. The two towers in my metro area are in those same areas.

 

I have heard this comment a lot. It seems to be more than anecdotal. It seems that in many places, Protection Sites are located in less than ideal locations. I have two theories...

  1. Tower rents are cheaper in the hood
  2. Population density is higher, so you can cover more POP's with less sites and get to the FCC requirement easier

Or maybe, it's both? Clearwire did not put up Protection Sites so they could be used and appreciated. They put them up for the sole purpose of keeping their license with the FCC. If anyone could actually use the signal, that was just a bonus for them. These were never seen as generating any revenue for Clearwire, quite the contrary. The Protection Sites are a huge financial drain on the company.

 

So, where they went was not strategic in any way for consumers or usability, only to maximize coverage area for purposes of FCC reporting.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WiMAX Speeds have always been extremely variable for me.

 

The routing doesn't seem all that great - the speed tests between various servers has VERY large swings.

 

That said, the right server at the right time = this:

 

6872836341_fca383598e.jpg

 

That said, most of the time WiMAX in Boston is no better than Sprint 3G and the coverage is beyond horrible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WiMAX Speeds have always been extremely variable for me.

 

The routing doesn't seem all that great - the speed tests between various servers has VERY large swings.

 

That said, the right server at the right time = this:

 

6872836341_fca383598e.jpg

 

That said, most of the time WiMAX in Boston is no better than Sprint 3G and the coverage is beyond horrible.

 

Wow. You are getting better download speeds than I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...