Jump to content

Sprint's Q1 Earnings Report (May 5th, 2015)


Ascertion

Recommended Posts

Marcelo: "It's going to be a MASSIVE densifcation of our network." "We are right now in the final stages, where we're selecting vendors...Balancing Macro/Pico Cells (counts)" 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connections. Includes m2m, wholesale, etc

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Would still put sprint at 3rd overall. I was under the assumption this was supposedly the quarter sprint fell to 4th, and lost subscribers, not gained them
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would still put sprint at 3rd overall. I was under the assumption this was supposedly the quarter sprint fell to 4th, and lost subscribers, not gained them

 

They're still losing phone customers.  Basically their MVNOs and tablet sales are keeping them growing.  It was good to see their churn % fall below 2.  Might mean the worst of the phone losses might be behind them.  But if they do want to hold onto #3 they will need to get that turned positive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint reports a loss for Q4 2014 struggles to amid competition and departing customers.

 

 

http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-reports-loss-continues-struggle-departing-customers

 

Yeah they made some very stupid decisions one of them over paying to get the Iphone which has taken Softbank to get that money back. The only thing they should be doing it putting up new towers like crazy and updating their current network but overall just improve their network coverage.  Either way at this point it might be good for them to merge with T-Mobile and work with Google more on their new service as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Claure, I don't really care about what place they're in as long as everything shows improvement. And everything is improving, so yey.

#GettingBetterEveryday

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're still losing phone customers.  Basically their MVNOs and tablet sales are keeping them growing.  It was good to see their churn % fall below 2.  Might mean the worst of the phone losses might be behind them.  But if they do want to hold onto #3 they will need to get that turned positive. 

Unless I read the newsroom report wrong I see total net postpaid additions 211,000 with 41,000 loss for total of 170,000 (postpaid) additions.

That's pretty good...actually damn good for what Sprint has gone through.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint reports a loss for Q4 2014 struggles to amid competition and departing customers.

 

 

http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-reports-loss-continues-struggle-departing-customers

 

Yeah they made some very stupid decisions one of them over paying to get the Iphone which has taken Softbank to get that money back. The only thing they should be doing it putting up new towers like crazy and updating their current network but overall just improve their network coverage. Either way at this point it might be good for them to merge with T-Mobile and work with Google more on their new service as well.

They made a commitment to buy certain amount of iPhones. They didn't overpay per unit.

 

Of course it'd be good to reduce competition for sprint TMO. And bad for consumers. Bye unlimited.

Anyway by the time a new fcc is seated to consider the merger in mid 2017, TMO and sprint will likely have made "too much" progress to argue they NEEED a merger.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I read the newsroom report wrong I see total net postpaid additions 211,000 with 41,000 loss for total of 170,000 (postpaid) additions.

That's pretty good...actually damn good for what Sprint has gone through.

The way his post is worded, he is talking about post-paid phone customers. The net adds includes tablets pumping things up (Sprint isn't the only carrier doing this). The bullet immediately below is

  • Postpaid phone losses of 201,000 improved sequentially for the fourth consecutive quarter and improved by nearly 500,000 year-over-year

Still signs of things potentially turning around...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I read the newsroom report wrong I see total net postpaid additions 211,000 with 41,000 loss for total of 170,000 (postpaid) additions.

That's pretty good...actually damn good for what Sprint has gone through.

They lost postpaid phones 210k

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint adds 1.2 million net additions to its platform for fiscal Q4, its highest total in three years

 

 

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sprint-adds-1.2-million-net-additions-to-its-platform-for-fiscal-Q4-its-highest-total-in-three-years_id68989

 

 

If they can keep making some network improvements that will hopefully keep things going in the right direction.. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They made a commitment to buy certain amount of iPhones. They didn't overpay per unit.

 

Of course it'd be good to reduce competition for sprint TMO. And bad for consumers. Bye unlimited.

Anyway by the time a new fcc is seated to consider the merger in mid 2017, TMO and sprint will likely have made "too much" progress to argue they NEEED a merger.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not unless they are still losing money. Both carrier haven't made a year end profit in years. This is the strongest argument for a merger. In a the U.S. vzw and ATT make rather large profits and sprint and T-Mobile lose money which is not a situation that argues well for four carriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I read the newsroom report wrong I see total net postpaid additions 211,000 with 41,000 loss for total of 170,000 (postpaid) additions.

That's pretty good...actually damn good for what Sprint has gone through.

 

That was the net postpaid amount.  All of those were tablet additions.  They lost 201,000 phone customers.  That's a continued improvement from last year and earlier quarters.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was the net postpaid amount.  All of those were tablet additions.  They lost 201,000 phone customers.  That's a continued improvement from last year and earlier quarters.  

 

it's important to keep this all in context too, they have over 50 million customers, 200k losses accounts for 0.4% or less of their total customers..they're not hemmoraging customers like they were, and they're slowing and offsetting losses. postpaid adds will come with network improvements, they have so far.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not unless they are still losing money. Both carrier haven't made a year end profit in years. This is the strongest argument for a merger. In a the U.S. vzw and ATT make rather large profits and sprint and T-Mobile lose money which is not a situation that argues well for four carriers.

 

TMO (and Sprint?) was losing money in 2011 when FCC, DOJ said NO

TMO and Sprint were losing money in 2014 when FCC, DOJ said NO

 

Look at DT capital markets 2015. Legere said TMO is way ahead of his team's expectations back in 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's important to keep this all in context too, they have over 50 million customers, 200k losses accounts for 0.4% or less of their total customers..they're not hemmoraging customers like they were, and they're slowing and offsetting losses. postpaid adds will come with network improvements, they have so far.

 

The only reason it matters is that those phone customers are the highest revenue customers.  They also tend to be stick around the longest because you have them on phone leases or Easy Pay.  But the good thing is the trend-line is going in a positive direction.  Slowly, but surely.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's important to keep this all in context too, they have over 50 million customers, 200k losses accounts for 0.4% or less of their total customers..they're not hemmoraging customers like they were, and they're slowing and offsetting losses. postpaid adds will come with network improvements, they have so far.

 

I'm very disappointed there was no 2.5 Ghz news; that can only mean not much progress was made last 3 months.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very disappointed there was no 2.5 Ghz news; that can only mean not much progress was made last 3 months.

Most 2.5 deployment has shifted to priority markets. That won't add more pops of coverage, but it will improve network quality in those markets.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TMO (and Sprint?) was losing money in 2011 when FCC, DOJ said NO

TMO and Sprint were losing money in 2014 when FCC, DOJ said NO

Right. But those where the decision of the ideological bent of the current FCC. In 2017 we are likely to have a different ideology governing the FCC, one that might be more inclined to listen to what the market seems to be saying. It does no good to have four national carriers unless they are all profitable, otherwise we end up with three or less anyway and have to go through bankruptcy rather than a merger to get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I assume that any agreement is not perpetual and has an end date. - Trip
    • I think it is likely that T-Mobile will be forced to honor any existing US cellular roaming agreements in those areas as a condition of them taking over the spectrum.  In that case, there would be no improvement of service unless T-Mobile improves the service offering in those areas.
    • My understanding is the MNO carriers are the one who have objected to the use of cell phones in commercial planes.  I understand that it ties down too many cell phones at once, thus I can not see this changing. However this depends on how it is structured. Use of a different plmn for satellite service might make it possible for planes only to connect with satellite. Private pilots have been using cellphones in planes for many decades. Far fewer phones at a lower altitude.
    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...