Jump to content

HTC EVO 4G LTE


P_M_G

Recommended Posts

Engadget have benchmarked the phone against the Note, the One X(AT&T and Global version), the and One S. The dual core S4 outperforms the quad Exynos in the majority of benchmarks, sometimes by double.

 

http://www.engadget....iii-benchmarks/

 

I've seen articles that the US version of the Galaxy SIII will come with a Snapdragon S4, so the CPU comparison will be a wash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though it beat the One X (AT&T) in some tests and even the One S (Int), for a phone having 2 more cores, it really didn't totally blow anything away in the benchmarks. There were a few that were significantly higher but most were a few ticks either behind or ahead of the dual cores. Have you seen if the if the Exynos quad supports LTE and such on chip like the S4?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen articles that the US version of the Galaxy SIII will come with a Snapdragon S4, so the CPU comparison will be a wash.

 

Hmm interesting. The S4 does come in quad version according to Qualcomm's website. It would definitely interesting to benchmark the quad vs dual versions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though it beat the One X (AT&T) in some tests and even the One S (Int), for a phone having 2 more cores, it really didn't totally blow anything away in the benchmarks. There were a few that were significantly higher but most were a few ticks either behind or ahead of the dual cores. Have you seen if the if the Exynos quad supports LTE and such on chip like the S4?

 

Well if the cores were Cortex-A15 then you'd of seen a pure stomping of the S4....but given the SGS3 having A9's the S4 can make up for some room with the core disadvantage it has

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well if the cores were Cortex-A15 then you'd of seen a pure stomping of the S4....but given the SGS3 having A9's the S4 can make up for some room with the core disadvantage it has

 

I can't wait for a chip with A15 cores to come out.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm interesting. The S4 does come in quad version according to Qualcomm's website. It would definitely interesting to benchmark the quad vs dual versions.

 

I think Qualcomm is having such a difficult time getting usable dual-core chips out of TSMC, it will be a while before TSMC has enough capacity to bake quad-core chips in large numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't wait for a chip with A15 cores to come out.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Yeah I love Qualcomm's stuff but they really throw a wrench into things since they dont use the standard ARM like everyone else seems to do...using their own stuff and in turn making it Cortex-A15(LIKE) instead of a full blown A15 leaves a ton of variables out there...but if everyone had the same stuff this wouldn't be as fun then i guess. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Qualcomm is having such a difficult time getting usable dual-core chips out of TSMC, it will be a while before TSMC has enough capacity to bake quad-core chips in large numbers.

 

their last roadmap didn't have an MSM variant of the S4 in quadcore till Q1 '13...though there were those rumors of one being out by the end of this fall...it goes against the roadmap less its using the modemless APQ8064 quad chip...

given that alone I wouldn't put much stock in the production issues now being the reason for a lack of one...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I think Qualcomm is having such a difficult time getting usable dual-core chips out of TSMC, it will be a while before TSMC has enough capacity to bake quad-core chips in large numbers.

 

Are you going by the blogosphere accounts of financial chat with Qualcomm?

 

If so, per usual, the blogosphere hacked that transcript and added to it whole cloth.

 

The supply is going to lower for a bit this year but I don't believe that it's a yield problem. I believe that the public record only shows that supply is within band of original projections but that the demand projections were much lower than actual demand.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Well if the cores were Cortex-A15 then you'd of seen a pure stomping of the S4....but given the SGS3 having A9's the S4 can make up for some room with the core disadvantage it has

 

Respectfully, the urban myth of the A15 killing the Krait - that's not terribly accurate at all.

 

In fact, it's rather inaccurate.

Edited by EarlyMon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respectfully, the urban myth of the A15 killing the Krait - that's not terribly accurate at all.

 

In fact, it's rather inaccurate.

 

???

 

So then the Krait would have to preform better than a regular A15 for that to happen no? 4 A15's at 32nm vs the 2 28nm kraits.....you think the 4 A15's wouldn't stomp the 2 kraits?

 

If your talking simply 1 A15 versus 1 Krait then I fully agree with you and think you just miss took what I was referring to in my post b/c thats not what I was talking about the SGS3 cores there being A15....

 

Edit:

 

After going back through and reading the posts in order im pretty sure I easily could of come off wrong there in my previous post. lol

By NO MEANS did I mean to infer the A15 is a Krait killer. lol

Was saying if the SGS3 had A15 cores it would of stomped the S4 completely...worded poorly by me originally there as I left the whole SGS3 part out and was just commenting on the last sentence of the post i quoted really. lol

 

oops :)

 

Anyone that thinks the A15 stomps the Krait is deeply mistaken, imho :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand corrected. :)

 

The Sammy approach leaves the ARM Cortex page behind and varies like the S4 - asynchronous cpu clocks and independent voltages. Very out of the box for an ARM.

 

I do wonder at their choice of the A9 right now. Maybe they think it's enough? Maybe they want those new technologies (for them) down first before tackling the A15?

 

Interesting times indeed. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand corrected.

 

The Sammy approach leaves the ARM Cortex page behind and varies like the S4 - asynchronous cpu clocks and independent voltages. Very out of the box for an ARM.

 

I do wonder at their choice of the A9 right now. Maybe they think it's enough? Maybe they want those new technologies (for them) down first before tackling the A15?

 

Interesting times indeed.

 

Yup very interesting indeed!

 

Then toss in Intel in the near future and the chip battle heats up much more given their claims at CES...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yup very interesting indeed!

 

Then toss in Intel in the near future and the chip battle heats up much more given their claims at CES...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

I am also looking forward to seeing what Intel brings to the table

 

Sent from my Kindle Fire running CM9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they put the same size battery in the Evo LTE as what's in the RAZR MAXX, then heck to the LTE iPhone. I love all day battery life. :D

 

Edit: Who knows, maybe someone will make an external battery case like the Mophie for this phone.

 

I ran across this when I was browsing. http://www.power-skin.com/battery-cases/ap1507evo/htc-evo-powerskin.html

 

There is one "coming soon" for the HTC One S, so it looks like there is a good chance that there will be something for the EVO LTE. I didn't even know about PowerSkin until today.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran across this when I was browsing. http://www.power-ski...-powerskin.html

 

There is one "coming soon" for the HTC One S, so it looks like there is a good chance that there will be something for the EVO LTE. I didn't even know about PowerSkin until today.

 

Guess it's possible for the LTE Evo to get an external battery after all. Thanks Scott for posting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just pre-ordered through Wirefly and the ship date of the Evo 4g LTE is May 18th.

 

:D

 

First confirmation. I'm still waiting on the official site to come online in the next 30 minutes.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just ordered my wife her EVO LTE from the official Sprint page. It says it will ship on or before national launch. But it doesn't disclose the national launch date. :(

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My telesale rep wouldn't confirm shipment date but said as early as May 10th. She wouldn't confirm it but said that it's a listed date in the computer as possible....

 

Ordered via telesales.

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, I posted at android central forums @ 8:14 about the May 18th release date... darn, I guess I was second.

 

on that forum though, someone pointed out that the promotion period for the presale on sprint.com ends on 5/17... would that further indicate a 5/18 launch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm reading people getting conflicting reports from sprint, may 10th,14th 17th & 18th.

 

I guess it'll be a waiting game for the shipping confirmations....

 

Gl and congrats everyone.

 

From Another poster :

 

I pre-ordered the 4G LTE on sprint.com, and then checked my order status... I got a message that some additional validation (or something like that) was required on the order, and to call an 800 number to expedite things.

 

...so I called, and answered a few questions (mainly identity verification stuff like address, number of lines on my account, etc.), and the representative said it my phone was in the warehouse now, and that it should be arriving in "two to five days".

 

Of course, he could've been horribly mistaken, but now I'm damned excited. Anyone else have any info/stories like this one?

 

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to get a little concerned. I hope they aren't shipping the device with the LTE Connectivity bug and just hoping to resolve it with an OTA after the fact. That would be a major bummer. Or would it?

 

Most of you would probably rather have the device with the bug, since very few of us have usable LTE at the moment. And unless you had another LTE device next to the EVOLTE, you would probably assume it was just a blocked LTE site if you couldn't connect. Interesting to ponder.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...