Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 User Thread


COZisBack

Recommended Posts

VCda1a7.jpg

Model: SM-N910P

Processor: 2.7 GHz Quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084

Display: Quad HD Super AMOLED

  • 5.7 inches / 1440 x 2560 / 515 PPI
  • 2Y9IpbI.jpg?1
Sprint Cellular Bands:
  • CDMA EV-DO Rev. A (800, 1900 MHz)
  • FDD-LTE (Bands 25, 26)
  • TD-LTE (Bands 41)
Wireless:
  • 802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi
  • Bluetooth 4.1 wireless technology
  • NFC
Notes:
  • Sprint Spark
  • Sprint Direct Connect Now
  • HD Voice
  • Wi-Fi Calling
  • No Sprint Band 41 Carrier Aggregation
  • Not Fully CCA/RRPP Compliant
  • Currently no Sprint VoLTE capabilities
  • No SVLTE (Spark devices don't support SVLTE)
Sprint's Galaxy Note 4 "All you need is scented candles, massage oil, and Barry White. Write that down."
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Uh yes WiFi calling in US works fine.. I'm using it all the time

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Great. I'll update the article and this thread when I get back in town on Tuesday.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are users feelings on RF performance?  This is my first tri-band.  B41 is just starting to pop up here so I'm guessing the sites will have optimization so it is hard to judge.

 

I've gone up to 57 mbps in speed tests so far on B41.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pre ordered mine at Best Buy this past Monday. Went to pick it up yesterday evening, and they didn't have it. Was told that it would be there Friday (10-17). Very disappointed. They have no idea when it'll arrive. If it wasn't for the $200 off, I'd cancel this and go directly to Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope the rest of the User Threads have the info posted in the OP like this one. Nicely done, @CozisBack.

That's currently the plan. Stay tuned.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually in awe so far of camera performance. ugemazu7.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Nice view. It's that time of year again haha. Where is that at? I like my Carolina fall trees when I'm wheeling around.

 

Sent from my LG G3.

Edited by ghostkilla1388
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reception is great. Spark really does make a difference. On my S3 at my desk by a window at my work I would be lucky to get 1-2 Mbps. Now no get 5-7 Mbps, and when I used to go to the interior I got only 3G, now I am getting 1-2 Mbps LTE in most of the interior of my building.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reception is great. Spark really does make a difference. On my S3 at my desk by a window at my work I would be lucky to get 1-2 Mbps. Now no get 5-7 Mbps, and when I used to go to the interior I got only 3G, now I am getting 1-2 Mbps LTE in most of the interior of my building.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

What band when in the interior of the building?

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does WiFi calling ask to verify address all the time, even on other Sprint phones?  Seems to always be in my notification window.

 

Mine is constantly asking on the GS5.  Probably the same on the note 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...