Jump to content

Who roams on whom? (Updated Title)


burnout8488

Recommended Posts

Sprint roams on Cricket a lot in the central valley (California).

 

Anytime I see that I'm roaming on Cricket, I feel very very discouraged. Sprint has made me feel socially inferior to a Cricket customer...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This explains why I get connected to MetroPCS around Los Angeles at times. I thought their CDMA network was dismantled already after the T-Mobile merger.

T-Mobile has only dismantled CDMA so far in markets that are AWS only: Las Vegas and Boston. At the end of this month, another AWS CDMA market will be shut down: Philadelphia. Eventually the entire CDMA network will be shut down, but for now, the PCS CDMA persists. AWS and PCS LTE has been turned off on the MetroPCS network everywhere, and all users were shifted to the MOCN-enabled T-Mobile network for PCS/AWS HSPA+ and AWS LTE (and soon PCS LTE, too).

 

T-Mobile roams on AT&T, but only in certain, specific, hand-picked areas (on a nearly tower by tower basis). It's usually only allowed in places *far* removed from T-Mobile's own native coverage.

 

AT&T does not usually allow any roaming on T-Mobile, even when they have no native service and T-Mobile does. (This might be different for Business or M2M customers, or in some hand-picked markets -- I don't know about that specifically. But generally, normal lines do not allow roaming of any kind onto T-Mobile.)

 

This isn't always true however.  For instance, during Hurricane Sandy,  AT&T and T-Mobile agreed to complete network sharing temporarily, so that you could switch between them at any time on any device - http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/31/att-and-t-mobile-temporarily-share-their-networks-in-nyc-nj/

 

But acts like that (while always 100% technologically available) are very rare to see in practice.

 

Unfortunately, AT&T doesn't allow roaming on T-Mobile anywhere except in extremely specific circumstances for anyone. However, they are perfectly happy paying Verizon for Unicel GSM coverage even if T-Mobile UMTS roaming coverage would be cheaper and better (this occurred in pockets of North MS). There was a small bit of PacBell bidirectional (AT&T<->TMUS) in-market roaming still available in Northern CA, but that expired earlier this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a small bit of PacBell bidirectional (AT&T<->TMUS) in-market roaming still available in Northern CA, but that expired earlier this year.

The final end to the last roaming agreement created by the Cingular/AT&TWS merger 10 years ago. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for changing it to "whom"... that was really bothering me!

 

The title also needs to be changed to "Which roams on which?" or "What roams on what?"  So, now, let that bother you.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who/whom/whose can refer to groups, including companies, in standard English. I don't see a problem. For example, we say "who is the best soccer team in MLS?" not "which is the best soccer team in MLS?"

 

A completely inanimate object might not take who or whom, but Sprint (like Soylent Green) is made of people.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A completely inanimate object might not take who or whom, but Sprint (like Soylent Green) is made of people.

 

EP6uSBs.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Went to Cozumel Mexico a couple weeks ago. Before I went I added Sprints free International roaming plan to all my lines. Not sure why you have to add free options. Anyway I was connected to Mexico's Movistar network on wcdma with unlimited text and data and didn't get charged a dime. Thought that was pretty cool compared to the way other carriers charge for international text and data. Also connected to wcdma in the Cayman Islands with no charges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to roam a lot in Houston with Cricket, then Verizon if that wasn't available...I also roamed in some rural highways on Verizon when traveling around East and Central Texas.

 

But that was 2+ years ago. I haven't roamed since 1x800 got lit up all over the place in Texas, even in rural highways. I think the only time I roamed as of late was when I went into Tijuana a year ago. Surprisingly Cricket was border blasting the immidiate border area of Mexico.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...