Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Even if T-Mobile gets some 600 MHz spectrum in the auction, that won't do much to address its speed issues will it?

If so I would think it would only be minimally because of the small bandwidth, but every bit helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if T-Mobile gets some 600 MHz spectrum in the auction, that won't do much to address its speed issues will it?

Not in the short term. Who knows when it would be available to be deployed. AWS-3 will help more as that could be deployed later this year to the next I think. Not completely positive on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in the short term. Who knows when it would be available to be deployed. AWS-3 will help more as that could be deployed later this year to the next I think. Not completely positive on that.

 

Tarek Robbiati said 600 MHz wouldn't be available for use until 2021.

 

http://www.lightreading.com/mobile/mec-(mobile-edge-computing)/sprint-cfo-600mhz-auction-will-not-deliver-enough-spectrum/d/d-id/720282

 

(Jeez LightReading: Who puts () in a URL?)

 

 

"This auction is at best going to give a block of 2x10MHz spectrum," Tarek Robbiati said at the Citi 2016 Internet, Media and Telecommunications Conference. "For a really, really high-speed network you need at least 2x20MHz of contiguous spectrum."

 

Furthermore, Robbiati suggested, the spectrum won't be available for use until 2021. (See Sprint Says It Will Sit Out Incentive Auction .)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

EDIT: But VZW is coming to the end of their spectrum soon enough so they might end up in the same predicament as T-Mobile soon.

With AWS-3, PCS and Cellular 850. I wouldn't call that soon. It will take at least 2-3 years to get that deployed to the masses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not looking good for that free stuff on Tuesday thing. The moochers came out in force.

http://www.androidpolice.com/2016/06/16/dominos-suspends-participation-in-t-mobile-tuesdays-indefinitely/

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

As far as "Uncarriers" go, this was pretty underwhelming and poorly executed.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing worth noting that Sascha Segan said was that T-Mobile actually performed worse this year around than it did last year and he attributed it to their success at gaining customers.

 

In my opinion the problem is that T-Mobile has been really invested in expanding coverage as much as possible so they've been implementing too many stopgaps instead of actually fixing it the amounting congestion problems by doing things like capping streaming quality with BingeOn and aggregating Band 12 and Band 4 (which really isn't helping the congestion on Band 12 anyway).

 

Meanwhile Verizon has been hard at work spending millions on densifying their network with small cells and deploying large swaths of more spectrum in PCS and eventually Cellular frequencies. Sprint too seems to be on the ball, deploying a third Band 41 carrier in many places and densifying with small cells.

 

From my observations, T-Mobile threw all their eggs in early on which gave them a really fast network early on but both RootMerics and now PCMag's test are now showing them to be slowing down and now they're scrambling to spend millions if not billions on more spectrum in an attempt to keep their high speed reputation.

 

 

EDIT: But VZW is coming to the end of their spectrum soon enough so they might end up in the same predicament as T-Mobile soon.

I'm genuinely surprised T-Mobile hasn't got a big small cell install in the field yet. If they do I don't see it yet. I realize LAA is part of their plan but that is primarily for congested indoor environments like shopping malls, big box stores, and large office buildings. That isn't for deployment on macros. T-Mobile could use small cells for the congested hotspots. The use of B41 in the hotspot areas is a huge reason why Sprint speeds got way better in the PC Mag testing. T-Mobile could use LAA in cities like Chicago and St. Louis where they have congestion in crowded areas.

 

Verizon is a huge monolith to spend problems away. T-Mobile doesn't have that luxury. Even with an incredible network leader, TMo has to be very disciplined with network spending because they lack the scale of Verizon and AT&T. That is a large part of why T-Mobile couldn't modernize all rural sites yet. Expanding coverage is a good thing for T-Mobile but it is a long term bet.

 

Verizon is likely to push harder on VoLTE. They aren't to the point where they can pull CDMA out of phones yet but they are to the point where they can default VoLTE.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as "Uncarriers" go, this was pretty underwhelming and poorly executed.

 

I want to know who is paying for all these free pizza's? But yeah very poorly executed and the right choice for Domino's to withdraw from the program.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm genuinely surprised T-Mobile hasn't got a big small cell install in the field yet. If they do I don't see it yet. I realize LAA is part of their plan but that is primarily for congested indoor environments like shopping malls, big box stores, and large office buildings. That isn't for deployment on macros. T-Mobile could use small cells for the congested hotspots. The use of B41 in the hotspot areas is a huge reason why Sprint speeds got way better in the PC Mag testing. T-Mobile could use LAA in cities like Chicago and St. Louis where they have congestion in crowded areas.

 

Verizon is a huge monolith to spend problems away. T-Mobile doesn't have that luxury. Even with an incredible network leader, TMo has to be very disciplined with network spending because they lack the scale of Verizon and AT&T. That is a large part of why T-Mobile couldn't modernize all rural sites yet. Expanding coverage is a good thing for T-Mobile but it is a long term bet.

 

Verizon is likely to push harder on VoLTE. They aren't to the point where they can pull CDMA out of phones yet but they are to the point where they can default VoLTE.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

In regards to in-call management, has (can?) CDMA carriers improved? I remember the experience being vastly superior on GSM carriers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In regards to in-call management, has (can?) CDMA carriers improved? I remember the experience being vastly superior on GSM carriers.

You mean on Wideband CDMA like what the 3GPP evolution specified, or old TDMA based GSM voice? The former was very good at it. The other sucked and was a large reason why I dumped AT&T for Verizon long ago. The former didn't reach where I lived into 2013. Wasn't on 850 MHz until 2015 here. T-Mobile never bothered to put the former here, it was only AT&T.

 

Specific generations of the technology matter. As for VoLTE, it is a completely different beast with lots of different implementations. T-Mobile has a different VoLTE implementation than Verizon, for example. I might have to write an entire technical post on this and ON VoLTE standardization. It's going to be a while, though, before the dust settles in that regard.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tmobile only bid AWS3 in very small  pockets around the country. TMOBILE and Verizon will need more spectrum, and this is why Dish will have these fighting and bidding for their assets. 

 

 

While  those carriers scramble for more spectrum  Sprint will be riding on densification and deploying extra Carriers on the 2.5ghz band. This is why they are rushing to the 5G hype, and using very high bands that won't penetrate paper bag.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tmobile only bid AWS3 in very small pockets around the country. TMOBILE and Verizon will need more spectrum, and this is why Dish will have these fighting and bidding for their assets.

 

 

While those carriers scramble for more spectrum Sprint will be riding on densification and deploying extra Carriers on the 2.5ghz band. This is why they are rushing to the 5G hype, and using very high bands that won't penetrate paper bag.

When we talk about the needs for 5G which include getting paper bag spectrum, by that I mean real paper bag spectrum north of 5 GHz, penetrating walls, 1 Gbps speeds on average, and sub 1 ms latency... What is really needed for that is a breakthrough in air interface. Hope either Nokia or Ericsson have something really good up their sleeve.

 

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Questions:  why did Sprint embark and rip and replace NV1 in the first place?  Was it because the equipment that was in place is not compatible for LTE?  As Sprint migrate to 5G, do they have to do rip and replace again or is it more like an add on to what already in place for LTE?

 

NV1 was the groundwork for LTE, the same equipment is used for 3G and LTE.

 

5G is a completely different animal, so it's too soon to look at how it will be deployed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned this a while ago.. I think Sprint needs a way to jump ahead of the others since they are playing catch up. Would Sprint be able to handle changing all its plans to unlimited but throttled, essentially doing what T Mobile is doing with Binge on?

For example: 3 plans unlimited. $50 unlimited throttled at 2 Mbps.

$65 unlimited throttled at 8 Mbps (like cricket)

$85 truly unlimited no throttle (maybe after 30 gb if conjested)

This would basically defeat Binge on and music freedom and no net neutrality issues.

These plans and prices are just examples off the top of my head. Would this benefit or hurt Sprint?

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Specific generations of the technology matter. As for VoLTE, it is a completely different beast with lots of different implementations. T-Mobile has a different VoLTE implementation than Verizon, for example. I might have to write an entire technical post on this and ON VoLTE standardization. It's going to be a while, though, before the dust settles in that regard.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

The VoLTE problem is on its way to being solved. The GSMA just finalized an global standard for VoLTE called OMD (Open Market Device). More info here

 

http://np.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/4of25n/_/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned this a while ago.. I think Sprint needs a way to jump ahead of the others since they are playing catch up. Would Sprint be able to handle changing all its plans to u limited but throttled, essentially doing what T Mobile is doing with Binge on?

For example: 3 plans unlimited. $50 unlimited throttled at 2 Mbps.

$65 unlimited throttled at 8 Mbps (like cricket)

$85 truly unlimited no throttle (maybe after 30 gb if conjested)

This would basically defeat Binge on and music freedom and no net neutrality issues.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

 

Throttling like that would be the definition of suicide for Sprint. If they want to do that for their prepaid brands to make it similar to Cricket, I'd be fine with that. You'd just get a ton of people complaining that they can't get 8 Mbps in the first place. Plans like that aren't great for today's networks. Maybe for fixed wireless (which is something that we'll likely see with 5G) plans like that will come to fruition. 

 

I think Sprint should make a throttled Unlimited plan (6-8Mbps) for prepaid brands only and offer full speed data for capped plans that throttle you after your limit.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned this a while ago.. I think Sprint needs a way to jump ahead of the others since they are playing catch up. Would Sprint be able to handle changing all its plans to unlimited but throttled, essentially doing what T Mobile is doing with Binge on?

For example: 3 plans unlimited. $50 unlimited throttled at 2 Mbps.

$65 unlimited throttled at 8 Mbps (like cricket)

$85 truly unlimited no throttle (maybe after 30 gb if conjested)

This would basically defeat Binge on and music freedom and no net neutrality issues.

These plans and prices are just examples off the top of my head. Would this benefit or hurt Sprint?

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

I think the problem with plans like this that sets a max download speed you can do, is that Sprint (nor any other wireless provider) can not guarantee that a particular customer can get say 8Mbps consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VoLTE problem is on its way to being solved. The GSMA just finalized an global standard for VoLTE called OMD (Open Market Device). More info here

 

http://np.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/4of25n/_/

Hopefully, Sprint implements this.  Since they don't have VoLTE implemented anywhere yet, it should be a better solution to just implement this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Throttling like that would be the definition of suicide for Sprint. If they want to do that for their prepaid brands to make it similar to Cricket, I'd be fine with that. You'd just get a ton of people complaining that they can't get 8 Mbps in the first place. Plans like that aren't great for today's networks. Maybe for fixed wireless (which is something that we'll likely see with 5G) plans like that will come to fruition.

 

I think Sprint should make a throttled Unlimited plan (6-8Mbps) for prepaid brands only and offer full speed data for capped plans that throttle you after your limit.

If you get more people on the lower throttle like 1.5 or 2 Mbps, wouldn't that create less strain on the network? I looked at T Mobiles plans. The minimum for Binge on is $65 for 6GB. Sprint can even do $60 as the minimum unlimited and have a $50 tiered plan. T Mobile is $50 for 2GB.

I think Sprint has to try something besides waiting for 5G and small cells. How long can they rely on 50% offer.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you get more people on the lower throttle like 1.5 or 2 Mbps, wouldn't that create less strain on the network? I looked at T Mobiles plans. The minimum for Binge on is $65 for 6GB. Sprint can even do $60 as the minimum unlimited and have a $50 tiered plan. T Mobile is $50 for 2GB.

I think Sprint has to try something besides waiting for 5G and small cells. How long can they rely on 50% offer.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

All the carriers are at or near their spectrum peak, Sprint is just getting started. So no worries.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem with plans like this that sets a max download speed you can do, is that Sprint (nor any other wireless provider) can not guarantee that a particular customer can get say 8Mbps consistently.

Not if you word the plan correctly like cricket does.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...