Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I think it is generally pretty fair to rank sprint down at the bottom of lte coverage and speeds in a great many markets. The key to sprint having a competitive network has always been the deployment of lte across all three bands (adding more cells would help too) and they are not even close to completing this. Until then sprint's network will continue to under perform the competition.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So I'm listening to the webcast and marcelo said they posted a net positive in post paid this quarter (Q4) and they were short of a million.

 

He also said this was the best quarter the company had in years.

 

 

That's what I heard I have to re listen to it to make sure haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I'm listening to the webcast and marcelo said they posted a net positive in post paid this quarter (Q4) and they were short of a million.

 

He also said this was the best quarter the company had in years.

 

 

That's what I heard I have to re listen to it to make sure haha

Please do!!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still listening and he did say their was net positive add for prepaid, POSTPAID!!! and enterprise.

 

 

 

He also mentioned about monetizing the 2.5 spectrum

Well that's good to reach almost 1 million I guess sprint can keep their position as number three for another quarter.

 

Let's see what kind a impact Marcelo can make in a year. So good so far though.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by derrph
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it weird that Dan Hesse said Sprint will report a net positive in Q4 2014 ?!? Lol makes me feel all of this was pre-planned

That I do remember him saying. But how was it pre-planned? You mean based on the current rate of redoing the network at that time last year?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by derrph
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That I do remember him saying. But how was it pre-planned? You mean based on the current rate of redoing the network at that time last year?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I meant how it's crazy how they called that earlier on. Just seemed like everything somehow fell into place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they're selling the 2.5 ghz? Selling to TMObile would result in least pain for sprint.

 

He was quite clear it was VERY early and they may not actually sell any but are reviewing the feasibility and what they require.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they're selling the 2.5 ghz? Selling to TMObile would result in least pain for sprint.

They are looking at different opportunities but nothing is official. I actually hope they sell it to Dish since Dish wanted that spectrum and I'm still hoping they form a partnership

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of Dish they have been awfully quiet. I'm kind of surprised they haven't made an offer to tmobile yet

Dish doesn't actually want a carrier. They just wanna up everyone else's portfolio's value so that it would indirectly up the value of their spectrum portfolio. The only reason they bidded on Clearwire to start was to increase the value of AWS 4, it's the same case with AWS 3 now. They have no interest of being a carrier or having a real spectrum potfolio, all about resale value come the day everyone needs more capacity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideally, they wouldn't have to sell any spectrum. They can monetize anything extra for fixed wireless. Long-term profits from an ISP business may outweigh any short-term cash they can get from a spectrum sale.

 

However, if SoftBank is not willing to chip in some of the tens of billions that will likely be necessary to purchase 600 MHz nationwide next year, then they could start by divesting or terminating the leases on the EBS they don't own, especially in markets where they have more than 120 MHz of combined BRS+EBS. Using more than that would require yet more equipment (a second 8T8R antenna+RRU set) anyway.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The network deployment has met targets for Q4 which is something that Sprint had serious issues with under Hesse. 

 

http://www.prweb.com/releases/JeffKAGAN-IndustryAnalyst/Sprint-progress-2014-2015/prweb12405655.htm

 

Here's a word or two from Jeff Kagan, who said that Sprint showed significant improvement. Also of note is that in the Ting GSM conference call, Ting also stated that Sprint was making significant progress  and that the Sprint network was working much better.

 

https://ting.com/hangout

 

Important comments start at 16:42.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was hoping to see more post paid net adds but anything positive is excellent and I imagine next quarter will be huge! Nearly a million adds total is awesome! A little confused why they are referring to this as the 3rd fiscal quarter? I would have thought we'd be at Q4 by now no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...