Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 15 January 2011

 

I figured I would see LTE before WiMax too. She may have just seen the 4G icon as it was trying to connect and thought it was connected...

Everytime I see those ping numbers comparing providers I laugh. They always show Sprint worse than I experience and AT&T better than I experience.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know of anyone that has been throttled? I am still curious to see if sprint is actually throttling people above 5gb this month or if they raised the limit after much consumer complaint.

 

I would expect the top 5 percent throttling to take a month to kick in following the initiation date earlier this month.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“T-Mobile is loved by regulators. Before, Legere was just half a maverick. After, he will be twice as crazy with double the asset base to work with.”

 

I read that quote and had a good chuckle. [Via]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well 12GB (no idea how I got that high, and no throttle). I did try to load some web pages today, and it tookva few tries to get it to load.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well 12GB (no idea how I got that high, and no throttle). I did try to load some web pages today, and it tookva few tries to get it to load.

That's been happening to me on both wifi and cellular data on and off the past few days here in California.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's been happening to me on both wifi and cellular data on and off the past few days here in California.

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Yeah my WiFi has been severely slow ping wise. 400+ms ping, jumping to sub 30ms ping and back high. Either my nexus Is acting up or networks are being funky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-10/don-t-let-sprint-buy-t-mobile

 

In which Susan Crawford laments a duopoly yet doesn't want a true challenger to that duopoly.

 

Here is the other side of it.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-10/let-sprint-buy-t-mobile

 

 

Wouldn't a combined company be able to leverage cheaper equipment from vendors? Especially if they expand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the other side of it.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-10/let-sprint-buy-t-mobile

 

 

Wouldn't a combined company be able to leverage cheaper equipment from vendors? Especially if they expand?

Yes, they would be able to purchase cheaper equipment.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the other side of it.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-10/let-sprint-buy-t-mobile

 

 

Wouldn't a combined company be able to leverage cheaper equipment from vendors? Especially if they expand?

There are actually some intelligent comments on that article. I was surprised by how many were in favor of the merger. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are actually some intelligent comments on that article. I was surprised by how many were in favor of the merger.

 

Yes a lot more intelligent than most articles posted regarding the words Sprint in it.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's free cash flow is affected by the massive capex outlay...

The 7 billion in capex Sprint has spent the last two years is about the same AT&T and Verizon spent for each of the last five years. This is the main arguement in favor of the merger vzw and AT&T can spend that much and still generate all the free cash flow of the industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 7 billion in capex Sprint has spent the last two years is about the same AT&T and Verizon spent for each of the last five years. This is the main arguement in favor of the merger vzw and AT&T can spend that much and still generate all the free cash flow of the industry.

Yep, I have been in support of the merger forever, although the two companies could have undertaken a joint venture to deploy LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.pcmag.com/fastest-mobile-networks

 

Accurate or flawed, sprint just cant catch a break. 2014 is just not shaping up to be sprints year, at least not with the media.

This helps frame a flawed argument that "sprint needs tmobile".

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

Since testing is done over a period of months or a year with most of these performance type stories, it will not be good for Sprint.  So even if things are much better right now, we are going to hear about how they were last quarter or last year.  Tmo was in a better position last year and will come off better in these analyses.

 

The best Sprint can do at this point for 2014 is starting to get good press by the end of the year and maybe relegate AT&T to last place.  AT&T is degrading at the moment and Sprint is improving.  That should be their next goal when this all happens again in 3-4 months.

 

Robert

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best Sprint can do at this point for 2014 is starting to get good press by the end of the year and maybe relegate AT&T to last place.  AT&T is degrading at the moment and Sprint is improving.  That should be their next goal when this all happens again in 3-4 months.

 

Robert

Already been happening in Manhattan over the past three months. Sprint's median data rates have surpassed AT&T's. http://explorer.netindex.com/maps

It should only get better once TDD LTE grid gets denser on the island, and TDD capacity layer should absolutely shine in this kind of environment.

 

5Ul2IfM.png

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since testing is done over a period of months or a year with most of these performance type stories, it will not be good for Sprint.

 

Robert

Well, actually the article says the tests were conducted from May 1st to May 23rd, which is a tight enough window for a test of this scale. Edited by CaptainSlow
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, actually the article says the tests were conducted from May 1st to May 23rd, which is a tight enough window for a test of this scale.

 

I wasn't addressing this specific test.  I was addressing JeffDTD's point that this is going to be a problem for Sprint throughout 2014.  It will be a common theme, however, probably starting to get better than AT&T in many markets.  And it looks like that is starting to happen as Milan pointed out above.

 

Robert

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh. I really hope this merger goes through and Masa knows what he is doing. Could 2 billion be enough for tmobile to complete their plan to expand HSPA and LTE to edge sites by the end of 2015? If so, Sprint is about to become number 4.

 

For some reason that video does not work on safari for me. Heres this http://seekingalpha.com/news/1799763-cnbc-sprint-t-mobile-agree-on-2b-breakup-fee-name

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want the name to be T-Mobile. That's counter-intuitive to Masa's goal.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No specific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...