Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

sprint-logo.jpg

 

Here we go....Even though the name won't stay. Maybe they should call it Legere Mobile Communications. Every person who signs up for a framily gets a free magenta phone cover.

Like it but put the magenta T in front and shorten the Sprint part at the end and call it Tint.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coverage map is interesting. It's odd that for the spectrum map they include Sprint's WCS holdings which are soon to be in the hands of AT&T, but they neglect to include BRS/EBS. I guess that would turn the entire map purple.  :unsure:

 

Yeah, it's amazing that they did not include BRS/EBS. The combined company will have plenty of mid and high frequency spectrum but not too much sub 1Ghz spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are being agitators a bad thing when it comes to the duopoly?

 

I could use a Sprint willing to agitate the incumbents. Maybe that Sprint would gain customers again. Maybe that Sprint wouldn't have to merge with T-Mobile to grow! What a wonderful concept.

 

Sprint once was that agitator. It would be nice to see that return.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, that map shows more increase in coverage than I think most people assumed. I know it's mostly edge coverage but T-Mobile is working on bringing that up to LTE.

And with the help of Masas deep pockets, that might happen faster than they anticipated.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

sprint-logo.jpg

 

Here we go....Even though the name won't stay. Maybe they should call it Legere Mobile Communications. Every person who signs up for a framily gets a free magenta phone cover.

 

Good job on the graphic work, but NO!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And with the help of Masas deep pockets, that might happen faster than they anticipated.

Ironically, sprint customers stand to gain a lot more coverage than T-Mobile people do. Especially in the west.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironically, sprint customers stand to gain a lot more coverage than T-Mobile people do. Especially in the west.

 

But I would assume most of that currently is EDGE, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I would assume most of that currently is EDGE, right?

Yes, but T-Mobile is upgrading those sites to LTE quickly, which would make it so sprint customers could access it with a compatible phone. Now it would take more work to make it voice compatible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in an area where T-Mobile has native coverage (EDGE) and Sprint has not. LTE from Sprint pretty much extends to the river border and doesn't make it over to the Illinois side.

 

Some boneheaded cell site deployment back in the Alamosa days, I take it. Southern Illinois was served by a bad affiliate.

 

For too long Sprint relied on First Cellular/Alltel/ATNI to get good coverage here with 3G roaming. Only they didn't deploy that within Randolph County for some reason. Just bizarre stuff. Now that safely blanket is going away, taken by AT&T...which, love them or hate them, is actually providing a second competitive carrier where most people here went with Verizon. ATNI never cared and it showed by their networks. They never tried to compete with Verizon. Their intention was to sell along, whether it be AT&T or Sprint.

 

The exception to this is Carbondale which always had a strong influx of college students from Chicago. Sprint is oddly strong there now, probably due to Network Vision.

 

I would guess lots of areas served by affiliates are in similar boats, maybe not as bad, but still not well set up. Not to mention Sprint and Ericsson never fixed the mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like it but put the magenta T in front and shorten the Sprint part at the end and call it Tint.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Just thought of the first post merger commercial if the use my T-int idea. Show a meeting where they try to pick which color to use in the new post merger coverage maps, yellow or magenta. Tempers flare and a fight breaks out. The commercial ends with "Tint vote now" and a URL to vote your preference.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are being agitators a bad thing when it comes to the duopoly?

When people fail to ask the question "why?", yes, being agitators is a bad thing. People just assume that Legere and company are making moves out of the goodness of their own hearts or because they are cool cats.

 

I could use a Sprint willing to agitate the incumbents. Maybe that Sprint would gain customers again. Maybe that Sprint wouldn't have to merge with T-Mobile to grow! What a wonderful concept.

 

A bunch of maybes will get you just a big, fat maybe. Not good enough.  Sprint seems to lose on every maybe.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When people fail to ask the question "why?", yes, being agitators is a bad thing. People just assume that Legere and company are making moves out of the goodness of their own hearts or because they are cool cats.

 

 

A bunch of maybes will get you just a big, fat maybe. Not good enough. Sprint seems to lose on every maybe.

 

AJ

Rocky And Bullwinkle - Maybe Dick Intro:

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When people fail to ask the question "why?", yes, being agitators is a bad thing. People just assume that Legere and company are making moves out of the goodness of their own hearts or because they are cool cats.

 

As someone acutely aware of Deutsche Telekom's distinctly non-disruptive positioning in other markets, I realize that. I am firmly aware, as I think most people are deep down, of this. DT's Challenger Strategy was laid out initially not by John Legere, but his predecessor, Phillipp Humm. Humm devised this strategy as a plan B after the government blocked the sale of the then T-Mobile USA, now TMUS, to AT&T Inc. Humm then left to go to Vodafone Germany to be closer to his family. (I'm sure you know all of this AJ, but it doesn't hurt to have a little history lesson for the others on the thread.)

 

A bunch of maybes will get you just a big, fat maybe. Not good enough. Sprint seems to lose on every maybe.

 

AJ

Sprint has had execution issues for a long time. Changing that culture is a Herculean task. T-Mobile already had the preparation to be disruptive done when Legere took the CEO position at T-Mobile US. Also let's not forget Neville Ray was doing the hard work of network upgrade preparation starting the day the AT&T sale failed. Without that base of work, this is nothing more than a noisy cymbal clanging in the distance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but T-Mobile is upgrading those sites to LTE quickly, which would make it so sprint customers could access it with a compatible phone. Now it would take more work to make it voice compatible.

 

No they can't.  Sprint LTE phones don't have B4 (AWS) LTE support which is needed to connect to the Tmobile LTE network.  Sprint LTE phones only have B25 (1900), B26 (800) and B41 (2.5 GHz) LTE support.  Your so called compatible phones are the Verizon, Tmobile and AT&T variants of that phone that can connect to Tmobile LTE.  Therefore the expansion of Tmobile LTE will not benefit Sprint customers at all at the very moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they can't.  Sprint LTE phones don't have B4 (AWS) LTE support which is needed to connect to the Tmobile LTE network.  Sprint LTE phones only have B25 (1900), B26 (800) and B41 (2.5 GHz) LTE support.  Your so called compatible phones are the Verizon, Tmobile and AT&T variants of that phone that can connect to Tmobile LTE.  Therefore the expansion of Tmobile LTE will not benefit Sprint customers at all at the very moment.

 

With the exception of the Nexus 5, of course.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the exception of the Nexus 5, of course.

 

You wrote that wrong.  You are supposed to say, "Nexus 5, for the win."  Or, as the Internet kiddies like to do, "Nexus 5, FTW."

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the exception of the Nexus 5, of course.

You wrote that wrong. You are supposed to say, "Nexus 5, for the win." Or, as the Internet kiddies like to do, "Nexus 5, FTW."

 

AJ

And the current generation iDevices.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone acutely aware of Deutsche Telekom's distinctly non-disruptive positioning in other markets, I realize that.

 

To be clear, I was not at all lumping you or anyone else here in that collective group of "people."  But I remain steadfast that most who are appreciative of the current T-Mobile and Legere view the combo effectively as Santa Claus.  And those folks do not care enough or are not intelligent enough to question "why?".

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the current generation iDevices.

 

…which can call 411, but they cannot connect to band 41.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they can't.  Sprint LTE phones don't have B4 (AWS) LTE support which is needed to connect to the Tmobile LTE network.  Sprint LTE phones only have B25 (1900), B26 (800) and B41 (2.5 GHz) LTE support.  Your so called compatible phones are the Verizon, Tmobile and AT&T variants of that phone that can connect to Tmobile LTE.  Therefore the expansion of Tmobile LTE will not benefit Sprint customers at all at the very moment.

Is a SprinT-Mobile merger beginning now at the very moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

…which can call 411, but they cannot connect to band 41.

 

;)

 

AJ

I was referring to band 4 LTE. Forgot to specify no Band 41.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...