Jump to content

T-Mobile providing nextivity Signal boosters to keep indoor customers satisfied


dkyeager

Recommended Posts

http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/t-mobile-providing-nextivity-signal-boosters-keep-indoor-customers-satisfie/2014-05-26

 

more details here:

http://www.tmonews.com/2014/05/cel-fi-t-mobile-signal-boosters-now-available-to-buy-from-nextivity-again/

 

There are situations were Wi-Fi is not practical, such as many rural areas that lack broadband and other areas where Wi-Fi is banned or tightly controlled.  T-mobile obviously wants to protect its investment in new customers.  This is also a tacit admission that many of their coverage holes will continue.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/t-mobile-providing-nextivity-signal-boosters-keep-indoor-customers-satisfie/2014-05-26

 

more details here:

http://www.tmonews.com/2014/05/cel-fi-t-mobile-signal-boosters-now-available-to-buy-from-nextivity-again/

 

There are situations were Wi-Fi is not practical, such as many rural areas that lack broadband and other areas where Wi-Fi is banned or tightly controlled.  T-mobile obviously wants to protect its investment in new customers.  This is also a tacit admission that many of their coverage holes will continue.

It still Wont help the large areas of edge only. They need more than Adding LTE to edge sites. They will need more sites. These can only provide so much to help those customers. It is another added expense for them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Low band spectrum helps too. It's worth noting Sprint still leads TMUS in that department. That said, there won't be true competitiveness with the duopoly unless Sprint and TMo join forces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An FAQ list for T-Mobile employees cited a situation in which a new T-Mobile customer took advantage of the operator's early termination fee credit, trading in more than one AT&T Mobility AT&T (NYSE: T) phone at a T-Mobile store. The customer subsequently complained that their residential coverage was worse with T-Mobile, but T-Mobile no longer had the customers' AT&T handsets and, thus, could not return them to the customer.

 

 

This is very interesting.  Again, I think it is important we watch T-Mobile churn.  How many are lured from AT&T only to be unsatisfied with the coverage.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is very interesting.  Again, I think it is important we watch T-Mobile churn.  How many are lured from AT&T only to be unsatisfied with the coverage.

I never had T-mobile but I know of a lot of people that come to the Rochester, NY area to different colleges and they are people who come from the big cities and complain about how awful the coverage is even in Buffalo and Syracuse but Rochester is better out of the three.  The two friends I still talk to weekly say its gotten better with LTE (that launched late last year).  I've personally had the 3 major and for this area I list them best to not so great S, A, then V (again this is for where I live and yes BIG V doesn't work well at my place, your lucky if you get one bar of service and I live in a city).  At&t I had them when 3G was the big thing and the major issue I had with them was not the coverage it was constant dropped calls!  

 

Anyways back to the T-mobile subject I personally would rather see Sprint take over T-mobile and keep the spectrum Sprint could use on the PCS side for example from what they got from Metro PCS and give the GSM to At&t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An FAQ list for T-Mobile employees cited a situation in which a new T-Mobile customer took advantage of the operator's early termination fee credit, trading in more than one AT&T Mobility AT&T (NYSE: T) phone at a T-Mobile store. The customer subsequently complained that their residential coverage was worse with T-Mobile, but T-Mobile no longer had the customers' AT&T handsets and, thus, could not return them to the customer.

 

 

This is very interesting.  Again, I think it is important we watch T-Mobile churn.  How many are lured from AT&T only to be unsatisfied with the coverage.

The same thing happened to my friend who I tried to get to jump over to Sprint on my Framily plan, but it was not due to coverage (it was a porting issure).  His IPhone was traded in and gone.  I guess it kind of encourages people to stay, but satisfied customers do not feel trapped and they give personal referrals.     

Edited by Calvin200
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what do new tmo customers who arent satisfied with coverage and have traded in for the etf promo do? Leave with prorated billing for their services and carry their gsm devices, with payment plans for the full retail of the new devices, back to att? And forego compensation for the traded device? Prob not. They prob stick around as tmo customers for awhile. Thats bloody

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what do new tmo customers who arent satisfied with coverage and have traded in for the etf promo do? Leave with prorated billing for their services and carry their gsm devices, with payment plans for the full retail of the new devices, back to att? And forego compensation for the traded device? Prob not. They prob stick around as tmo customers for awhile. Thats bloody

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

well they no longer have an ETF of $350 - months used. They are stuck paying a phone off.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least Sprint gives consumers a choice between the old model and the new one. I prefer the up front payment model but I can understand why some would prefer to sign a 2 year contract.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Low band spectrum helps too. It's worth noting Sprint still leads TMUS in that department. That said, there won't be true competitiveness with the duopoly unless Sprint and TMo join forces.

 

IMHO, I don't thinkS and TMUS joining up will do anything for better coverage anywhere.

They are and will cater to the most customers, coverage is something neither one cares about when most of the customers are in the cities.

 

Do not fall for the sales talk.

Edited by JoeJoeJoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, I don't thinkS and TMUS joining up will do anything for better coverage anywhere.

They are and will cater to the most customers, coverage is something neither one cares about when most of the customers are in the cities.

 

Do not fall for the sales talk.

The reason why coverage doesn't exist is because the cost to provide coverage would not reflect the income coming from those areas. They need more populous base to get more money to offset those cost.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason why coverage doesn't exist is because the cost to provide coverage would not reflect the income coming from those areas. They need more populous base to get more money to offset those cost.

but then the reason people are hesitant to move to these companies is lack of coverage. That's why Sprint's CCA plan is a great step.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

but then the reason people are hesitant to move to these companies is lack of coverage. That's why Sprint's CCA plan is a great step.

That is a huge reason. Reliability and consistency in rural and urban areas. It is a huge difference going from LTE/Wcdma to edge just by getting near the edge of town. Tmobiles is lacking on coverage which will hurt them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

but then the reason people are hesitant to move to these companies is lack of coverage. That's why Sprint's CCA plan is a great step.

 

The CCA plan sounds good on paper, and it will help in some regions.  But do not get any grand illusions.  The total CCA footprint is still less than that of VZW.  Plus, many CCA members are already in bed with VZW via the LTE in Rural America program. So, they are off the table for Sprint.

 

In the end, the Twin Bells have duopolized the truly national urban/rural wireless buildout.  That ship has sailed, and Sprint will probably have to make do with something less.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CCA plan sounds good on paper, and it will help in some regions. But do not get any grand illusions. The total CCA footprint is still less than that of VZW. Plus, many CCA members are already in bed with VZW via the LTE in Rural America program. So, they are off the table for Sprint.

 

In the end, the Twin Bells have duopolized the truly national urban/rural wireless buildout. That ship has sailed, and Sprint will probably have to make do with something less.

 

AJ

and that's what really concerned me about the CCA plan. What really stops big red from just gobbling them up. IIRC Son mentioned something about doing an organic build of the network where there was only one roaming provider-which im assuming he was referring to vzw-so if that is true that could definitely help where a CCA partnership isn't feasible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

and that's what really concerned me about the CCA plan. What really stops big red from just gobbling them up. IIRC Son mentioned something about doing an organic build of the network where there was only one roaming provider-which im assuming he was referring to vzw-so if that is true that could definitely help where a CCA partnership isn't feasible.

 

Sprint is not likely to do much additional organic buildout for its existing 50 million sub base.  It has long since reached the point of diminishing returns.  Rather, an organic buildout probably requires the economy of scale added by a T-Mobile acquisition.  And that looks to be a tough sell.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is not likely to do much additional organic buildout for its existing 50 million sub base. It has long since reached the point of diminishing returns. Rather, an organic buildout probably requires the economy of scale added by a T-Mobile acquisition. And that looks to be a tough sell.

 

AJ

they have to do something though. What are the chances the $8 billion in capex this year and next would go towards b41 expansion as well as additional sites with all three bands

 

Edit: sorry for getting off topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is not likely to do much additional organic buildout for its existing 50 million sub base.  It has long since reached the point of diminishing returns.  Rather, an organic buildout probably requires the economy of scale added by a T-Mobile acquisition.  And that looks to be a tough sell.

 

AJ

 

Maybe they can use that argument to sell the merger. As in we will organically cover 97% (for example) of the population if you let us merge. Yes the added expense of covering rural expanses can only be justified if it is spread out over both companies.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they can use that argument to sell the merger. As in we will organically cover 97% (for example) of the population if you let us merge. Yes the added expense of covering rural expanses can only be justified if it is spread out over both companies.

This is why I feel there is a chance that Sprint and T-Mobile are going to do a joint venture.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I feel there is a chance that Sprint and T-Mobile are going to do a joint venture.

 

Uh, yeah, here is John Legere's idea of a "joint venture"...

 

med-MJ-joint-smoked.jpg

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has to be some sort of long term plan in place to deal with rural coverage. I would not want any rural buildout until the cities are fixed, however. That said, I sense that with lower band spectrum finally freed up, there's much better economics in rural areas than there once was.

 

I just want people within Sprint who say "let's find a way" rather than "oh, the duopoly beat us to it when we were bogged down with the Nextel mess, so that opportunity is lost."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want people within Sprint who say "let's find a way" rather than "oh, the duopoly beat us to it when we were bogged down with the Nextel mess, so that opportunity is lost."

 

What Sprint did or did not do a decade ago may not have mattered.  I do not necessarily buy this, but some say an industry that has large barriers to entry and requires massive investment in infrastructure can support at most two effective competitors.  The Twin Bells may have been and will continue to be preordained.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T‑Mobile Shatters World Record for 5G Uplink Speed https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-shatters-for-5g-uplink-speed The biggest news in this is that T-Mobile only recently got access to n258 after swapping their n260 for it with AT&T and they wasted no time deploying it at SoFi Stadium. Hopefully that means we're gonna start seeing a lot more mmWave deployments in stadiums soon. *fingers crossed*
    • Would anyone else be curious in helping me compile a list of quirks for various devices/modems/chipsets for SCP? I've noticed that Mediatek chipsets seem to report more information than Qualcomm. I bought a cheap Moto G 5G 2024 and notice that it displays the LTE downlink bandwidth, and the NSA information of T-Mobile, something that my S22+, which is also Qualcomm, won't do. I'm hoping that we can convince either Google or OEMs to fix their reporting on various devices. So far across all Qualcomm devices I've tested: - NR neighbor cells don't report - NR downlink or uplink bandwidth doesn't report (NR doesn't appear with CA as a result, only showing LTE) - NR signal levels randomly stop updating for various period of time before continuing to update (affects CellMapper more) - LTE CA levels randomly report and don't always update quickly when CA changes   On the S22: - LTE Timing Advance (TA) doesn't work and always reports 0, reported issue to Samsung and waiting to hear back   On the Samsung Galaxy S series (USA - Qualcomm Snapdragon): - LTE downlink or uplink bandwidth isn't reported - T-Mobile NR NSA doesn't report band information, AT&T & Verizon work OK (n5 & n77 tested)
    • Definitely. There are still a handful of Sprint sites here that haven't been decommissioned yet but also haven't been upgraded yet and they're offline. I think T-Mobile really wants to keep them but for one reason or another is running into trouble.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...