Jump to content

How to Spot Sprint 8T8R TD-LTE RRHs (Nokia Networks)


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

Has anyone seen the Andrew/Commscope 8T8R antennas that they plan to deploy at the NSN sites? I can't find anything on those new 2.5GHz antennas.

Every single application in a Samsung or alcatel-lucent market that I've came across uses a KMW Communications antenna. There is one image of a slightly different antenna model that I've yet to confirm who it belongs to.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

 

No but the enclosures for all their flexi units are the same as seen in that picture.

 

72PCVNx.png

 

They could put it pole mounted like we're all used to or clustered together like T-mobile..

 

kYo8XwI.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lilotimz, on 23 May 2014 - 9:01 PM, said:

 

No but the enclosures for all their flexi units are the same as seen in that picture.

 

 

 

They could put it pole mounted like we're all used to or clustered together like T-mobile..

 

 

I was thinking that could be what the Panel looks like? The one in the picture I posted.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

no....

 

See this or this if you want to know what the Antennae looks like.

Are we talking about insect body parts or antennas?

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Checked the FCC and noticed that the actual model used by Sprint is VBNFZHE-02 which was certified on the 31st of October instead of the VBNFZHE-01 model certified in august. 

 

Fun fact: The relationship between Sprint and Nokia and Softbanks influence was in full effect since at least Q1 of 2013. Nobody noticed it but Nokia Solutions & Networks actually certified an 8T8R B41 RRH on April 12,2013 FCC ID VBNFZHA-01. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

If I'm in St. Louis tomorrow I'm definitely looking to see if anything can be spotted at permitted sites.

 

I checked a site in KC that was permitted for full NV and 2.5 at the same time, they took down the legacy gear and put up NV antennas last week, but no Nokia yet. I'll check again next weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I guess Louisville was first in ky to get b41 setups installed. I was wondering if the site was a network vision site that had it or was it a clear protection site that got upgraded?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I guess Louisville was first in ky to get b41 setups installed. I was wondering if the site was a network vision site that had it or was it a clear protection site that got upgraded?

Read this and the following post.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4956-kentucky-nashville-maps-and-stats/?p=352703

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh OK yes I missed that post but thanks for showing me. I see why I didn't really hear anything about it. Cool if I see anything here in BG I will let you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every single application in a Samsung or alcatel-lucent market that I've came across uses a KMW Communications antenna. There is one image of a slightly different antenna model that I've yet to confirm who it belongs to.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

Every single application I've found in Ericsson markets are using the CommScope TTTT65AP-1XR antenna.

 

http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product_details.aspx?id=34916

 

fYAUMxE.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every single application I've found in Ericsson markets are using the CommScope TTTT65AP-1XR antenna.

 

http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product_details.aspx?id=34916

 

They have a multitude of different vendors including mainland China ones which is not surprising since they're deploying 8t8r across the pond as well. A lot has been found since that post from months ago. :P

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/t-mobile-gets-little-closer-accessing-its-25-ghz-spectrum-auction-108 Senator Kennedy's bill to grant the FCC temporary auction authority to finish processing the Auction 108 licenses it has sold to their proper licensees. This would greatly benefit T-Mobile.  This delayed process took what would have been a strategic advantage for T-Mobile (1 one year plus head start)  and turned into catch-up, since AT&T and Verizon haven been busy installing their c-band n77 in rural areas.
    • I configured -44/-3 scenarios on an Edge 2022 to be an invalid connection, so yes, it would show no service.. I didn't realize it was a frequent issue though. How certain are you about the other values? Perhaps they are just unchanged from the previous array of signal information that was reported? If that is the case, I can try to have the app discard -44/-3 datapoints and leave the screen unchanged. I worry about the slippery slope of having it display as -140, because that leads users to believe there is a -140 signal present, when in reality we don't know what the actual reading is.   Haha me and you both wish this!!!
    • Following up, I've gone into the office in person today and took my Edge with me. It looks like it now shows "No service" instead of the -44/-3 value.  I saw a lot of "no service" because it apparently does it a lot.  I'll check again on the train ride home later. Assuming I'm correct, is it possible to have some kind of middle ground on this?  I think it was showing other legitimate values, like the TA, even when it was showing -44/-3.  I'd prefer it show the data it has but at -140 dBm in those cases.  I recognize this could be a pain to implement, and if it is, then no worries, mostly curious. EDIT:  But now I'm sitting here thinking "what if the PCI is bad and I don't know it?"  But that can just as easily be the case on other phones that aren't caught.  I do regularly see bad PCI entries on my other devices, so maybe this isn't the best option.  Bleh, I wish this stuff just worked properly! - Trip
    • Forgot to follow up on this. The service was once again abysmal .
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...