Jump to content

Pre-emptive strike: AT&T to offer T-Mobile users $200 to switch


GinaDee

Recommended Posts

T-Mobile's plans are working.  Legere's To-Do list says to remove the Pain Points from Families.  How else to do so other than forcing competition to offer incentives to switch carriers? 

 

Speech is free, expanding coverage will cost T-Mobile real money.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think AT&T has more Money to do things like this. AT&T could keep doing a promotion like this. If they did it for all 3 carriers they could gain A decent amount of subscribers. I wonder if sprint would Offer it. Also remember Carriers have done this type of stuff before. But it has not been publicly advertised Like this could be(At least I havent seen advertised )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If T-Mobile goes it alone, do you really believe they can afford to keep offering such incentives?

 

Are you assuming that Sprint powered by Softbank is the ONLY option for T-Mobile USA to remain viable?  This is the same argument AT&T used.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speech is free, expanding coverage will cost T-Mobile real money.

 

That's what paying customers are for and T-Mobie needs more for sure.  They have to do it organically until a better choice rears its head. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you assuming that Sprint powered by Softbank is the ONLY option for T-Mobile USA to remain viable?  This is the same argument AT&T used.

 

Not at all. They can remain independent if they really chose to, but they will have no money for spectrum and upgrades if they keep hurting margins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you assuming that Sprint powered by Softbank is the ONLY option for T-Mobile USA to remain viable?  This is the same argument AT&T used.  

No, but tmo and sprint will continue to need real money to constantly try and keep up.. merging would make it a lot easier..

verizon is said to be ready to start volte real soon.. handsets that support it should be out this year.

sprint is trying to get lte out, tmo is still trying to get rid of edge.. Both doing a lot of work just to saty in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So.... why not just have an all out tmo/att pricing war? Its not the network, its the price! Right? I fail to get excited. The day networks are equal everyones price adjusts.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all. They can remain independent if they really chose to, but they will have no money for spectrum and upgrades if they keep hurting margins.

 

I hold the opinion that there will be alternate suitors rearing their heads in early 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, but tmo and sprint will continue to need real money to constantly try and keep up.. merging would make it a lot easier..

verizon is said to be ready to start volte real soon.. handsets that support it should be out this year.

sprint is trying to get lte out, tmo is still trying to get rid of edge.. Both doing a lot of work just to saty in the game.

 

I agree additional funding always helps.  Sprint got SoftBank for their funding. 

 

T-Mobile will eventually be bought out or merged.  Whether it's Sprint, Dish, Vodafone, Carlos Slim etc. we'll likely know more later this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://9to5mac.com/2014/01/03/with-t-mobile-att-will-give-you-450-to-switch-kind-of/

 

 

Executive Statement

This is a desperate move by AT&T on the heels of what must have been a terrible Q4 and holiday for them. I’m flattered that we have made them so uncomfortable! We used AT&T’s cash to build a far superior network and added Un-carrier moves to take tons of their customers – and now they want to bribe them back! Consumers won’t be fooled…nothing has changed; customers will still feel the same old pain that AT&T is famous for. Just wait until CES to hear what pain points we are eliminating next. The competition is going to be toast!

-John Legere, CEO of T-Mobile USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The strategy is all end game to pump up DT's sale price.

 

Exactly. IMO It would be premature of SoftBank/Sprint to try and buy them at this juncture. Let this play out for another 12-18 then see where they're at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can he call tmobiles network superior? Yea their plans are better but come on tmobile is worthless outside most cities.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

I am so glad I am not the only one that was thinking that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a LOT of T-Mobile talk on here and across the rest of the tech industry.  I truely do love them, they are the most competitive company out there and they are making the "other" three worried.  I like the way their CEO is playin' the social media game.  I love their pricing.

 

I just can't get over the fact that literally 3/4 of their coverage is 2G with no (public) plans to modernize.  If I lived in the middle of NYC or CHI or something, I would totally be there.. but being a country guy all my life, they are worthless to me at this point.

 

I do NOT want to see them merge with Sprint though, as they are what is really driving the innovation in pricing and no-contract pricing right now and I feel that Sprint/Softbank would shut that down instantly to return the industry to status quo.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the financing aka one up stuff is here to stay and maybe take over. All sprint keeps telling us is to push it if they are eligible and that is our most important thing for sprint right now. From what i understand is it is highly profitable. Right now sprint is shooting for a 50% one up rate on sales but from what ive seen is most stores only getting 20-30%. And that is because too many people are not approved for it because of credit or payment history. I truely believe though that in a year or two sprint will move to a one up only model.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can he call tmobiles network superior? Yea their plans are better but come on tmobile is worthless outside most cities.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

Because it isn't run by Satan's mother in law :)

 

Networks vary location to location, we all know this. There are places, albeit in cities, where on occasion tmo does offer a better experience. Perhaps because their faux G was less congested or had more spectrum allocated to it. If you rarely needed rural coverage wouldn't you say tmo's network could be better? Cheaper and in some places faster? Admittedly it doesn't have the coverage and LTE isn't as widespread. If all 4 networks were pretty much identical we would be stuffed, no choice what so ever. It's all a matter of perspective. For some folks tmo (and Sprint) offer a better experience than the the other two. I'm not saying tmo (or sprint) is universally superior, although they are at least 400% less evil, but depending on your needs their network may be better.  

 

AT&T would have to do a lot more than offer $200 to make me switch. I did consider them a while back but honestly, the security of being able to avoid data overage induced bill shock and a few other things convinced me to stay with tmo until sprint rolled out NV here. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I just can't get over the fact that literally 3/4 of their coverage is 2G with no (public) plans to modernize.  If I lived in the middle of NYC or CHI or something, I would totally be there.. but being a country guy all my life, they are worthless to me at this point.

 

 

 

 

I think you just answered your own question.  Most of the US population lives in higher density populated areas.  Perceptions are based on everyone's individual reality.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can he call tmobiles network superior? Yea their plans are better but come on tmobile is worthless outside most cities.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

What do you consider worthless?  Not being able to make/receive calls in rural areas or having slow 2G/3G data in areas with poor backhaul?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No specific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...