Jump to content

Dan Hesse "2014 is our comeback year"


IamMrFamous07

Recommended Posts

When I read the hoopla about 180 Mbps on spark, I laugh. All people want is 1 (one) Mbps, or a signal where they don't have one.

 

I don't understand why they are spending a penny on this spark, when they haven't completed 35% of the NV upgrades, according to the status map.

Ummm.... go look at the NV Sites complete map. Your stats aren't even close.

 

Nearly 50% of Sprint sites have LTE enabled. More than 75% have NV Equipment installed and accepted, and another 5% or so have equipment installed, waiting for acceptance.

 

The whole Spark upgrade is still under Clearwire's operations. They haven't switched to Sprint's plan for Band 41 yet. And why not do the upgrades? They were already planned, and will help to create a better network.

 

And no, 180Mbps is not going to happen anytime soon. Currently, Spark is providing speeds between 50 and 70Mbps on a good signal. It will be a few years before we start to see carrier aggregation on Band 41 to get those 100+Mbps speeds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I read the hoopla about 180 Mbps on spark, I laugh. All people want is 1 (one) Mbps, or a signal where they don't have one. I don't understand why they are spending a penny on this spark, when they haven't completed 35% of the NV upgrades, according to the status map.

Actually, last week, NV was 48% complete by upgrade count. With the many upgrades the last few days, it is now nearly 50. This doesn't count any "in progress" sites or 800 SMR sites operating but not "officially" accepted.

 

Throwing more dollars at NV would be like hiring 9 women to try to have a baby in 1 month: You simply can't do it with just raw numbers.

 

BTW, I am sending this comment on a Band 41 "Spark" site in far NW suburban Chicago. There is a lot of execution behind Sprint's promises.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, last week, NV was 48% complete by upgrade count. With the many upgrades the last few days, it is now nearly 50. This doesn't count any "in progress" sites or 800 SMR sites operating but not "officially" accepted.

And that's just the LTE sites. Throw in the sites that are 3G complete, and sites with equipment installed an ready for acceptance, it's over 75%.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's just the LTE sites. Throw in the sites that are 3G complete, and sites with equipment installed an ready for acceptance, it's over 75%.

Actually, my numbers were for "technologies" (3G, 4G, 800). For total sites, you are absolutely correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I read the hoopla about 180 Mbps on spark, I laugh. All people want is 1 (one) Mbps, or a signal where they don't have one.

 

I don't understand why they are spending a penny on this spark, when they haven't completed 35% of the NV upgrades, according to the status map.

 

Unfortunately, people don't want just a 1 Mbps connection.  They think they want faster and faster.  The demand is there.  It's not as if Sprint is not working on Network Vision to just work on Spark/Band 41.  They have to be able to do it all.  Work on the present, and plan for the future.

 

It's not as if planning for Band 41 deployments in the future is stopping backhaul to a site in Pierce County, Washington now.  C'mon, get real.

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, my numbers were for "technologies" (3G, 4G, 800). For total sites, you are absolutely correct.

 

Ohhh. I understand. I like to look at it in site count, since all sites don't see all three acceptance reports, and some are missing. But that's a good way to see it. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've already sent map tweets at Miami Vice, showing the vast expanse of EDGE in the T-Mobile network. Funny he never replied to those.

 

Care to share those map tweets with us non-tweeters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I read the hoopla about 180 Mbps on spark, I laugh. All people want is 1 (one) Mbps, or a signal where they don't have one.

 

I don't understand why they are spending a penny on this spark, when they haven't completed 35% of the NV upgrades, according to the status map.

Spark is just marketing hoopla. The use of the 2500 frequency has been part of the Netwrok Vision strategy from the start. The only change is that they now intend on doing a full overlay. On paper the money has been spent. The only additional outlay has been the transition from targeted 2500 mhz deployments to the full overlay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TMO is really stupid by not upgrading the I-15 corridor to W-CDMA for data. That road is so well travelled every weekend, and even more so on holidays. All those bored people on thanksgiving weekend trying to go back to LA stuck for who knows how long, and how many of them were T-Mobile customers dying of boredom because they only had 2G Internet. Lol!

Does Sprint have LTE through there? Sensorly says no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Sprint have LTE through there? Sensorly says no.

No, no LTE except Victorville/Hesperia, CA. Barstow LTE might start coming online in the Spring. But between there and the Nevada border, probably not until 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no LTE except Victorville/Hesperia, CA. Barstow LTE might start coming online in the Spring. But between there and the Nevada border, probably not until 2015.

Only reason I said something was for the sake of being fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do have really decent 3G in most areas of that route though.

 

Not enough to stream pandora.  i could do iheart for a little and pandora would come and go.  It was tough trying to get traffic info half the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...