Jump to content

Verizon's Shammo: LTE capacity issues will be worked out by year-end


Recommended Posts

Posted

"The Verizon executive also touched on the company's 700 MHz A Block spectrum, which it has not yet sold after putting it on the block in 2012. "If a transaction makes sense, then we'll execute the transaction," he said. "If it doesn't, then we'll deploy it."

 

Idk much about the 700 MHz spectrum let a lone the A block spectrum but I do know sprint has stated they wanted more lower frequency spectrum. Do you think it will be smart for sprint to obtain some of it?

 

Or will it better if sprint waits for the 600mhz auction?

 

 

Read more http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizons-shammo-lte-capacity-issues-will-be-worked-out-year-end/2013-11-12

 

 

Random: Didn't sprint and cspire sign a roaming agreement for the 700 MHz spectrum

Posted

"The Verizon executive also touched on the company's 700 MHz A Block spectrum, which it has not yet sold after putting it on the block in 2012. "If a transaction makes sense, then we'll execute the transaction," he said. "If it doesn't, then we'll deploy it."

 

Idk much about the 700 MHz spectrum let a lone the A block spectrum but I do know sprint has stated they wanted more lower frequency spectrum. Do you think it will be smart for sprint to obtain some of it?

 

Or will it better if sprint waits for the 600mhz auction?

 

 

Read more http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizons-shammo-lte-capacity-issues-will-be-worked-out-year-end/2013-11-12

 

 

Random: Didn't sprint and cspire sign a roaming agreement for the 700 MHz spectrum

 

Verizon doesn't hold anywhere near nationwide licenses of 700 MHz A block.  Verizon does have some nice 700 MHz A block licenses in some big markets but the cost to add this LTE band to its phones are not worth it.

 

I would much rather have Sprint keep their spectrum profile the way it is going into the 600 MHz auction.  Since all 4 of the major carriers plan to participate in the 600 MHz auction and the intention is to have 1 single LTE band for all the frequencies in the 600 MHz band, the cost for antennas, filters, etc will be chaper due to huge economies of scale.  Sprint has enough stuff on their plate and doesn't need this spectrum.  I would much rather have Sprint purchase nationwide licenses of the PCS H block in Jan 2014.

Posted

Verizon doesn't hold anywhere near nationwide licenses of 700 MHz A block. Verizon does have some nice 700 MHz A block licenses in some big markets but the cost to add this LTE band to its phones are not worth it.

 

I would much rather have Sprint keep their spectrum profile the way it is going into the 600 MHz auction. Since all 4 of the major carriers plan to participate in the 600 MHz auction and the intention is to have 1 single LTE band for all the frequencies in the 600 MHz band, the cost for antennas, filters, etc will be chaper due to huge economies of scale. Sprint has enough stuff on their plate and doesn't need this spectrum. I would much rather have Sprint purchase nationwide licenses of the PCS H block in Jan 2014.

Well said. I remember when sprint submitted their application for the 600 MHz auction they wanted to use TD LTE for their rollout is this still true?

Posted

Well said. I remember when sprint submitted their application for the 600 MHz auction they wanted to use TD LTE for their rollout is this still true?

 

I hope TD-LTE is not used for 600 MHz.  I want the 600 MHz band to be FDD LTE.  I know that Tmobile, ATT, Verizon and other carriers would complain if the 600 MHz spectrum was configured in TD-LTE blocks.

Posted

I hope TD-LTE is not used for 600 MHz. I want the 600 MHz band to be FDD LTE. I know that Tmobile, ATT, Verizon and other carriers would complain if the 600 MHz spectrum was configured in TD-LTE blocks.

Why not? What does fdd LTE have over TD LTE? I'm learning lol

Posted

Why not? What does fdd LTE have over TD LTE? I'm learning lol

FDD LTE has better coverage overall and the version of LTE that is more widely deployed worldwide.  Not sure about this but I think FDD LTE would be more ideal for VoLTE than TD-LTE since you have symmetrical downlink and uplink frequency.  Sprint has to think of the future where they will need more low band spectrum for deployment for voice.  I hear that maybe some asian cell phone providers are testing with VoLTE calls over TD-LTE but I don't know the details.

 

I just know that Verizon, Tmobile and ATT would much rather have the 600 MHz blocks conducive for FDD LTE deployment rather than TD LTE and would complain if it wasn't.

Posted

"The Verizon executive also touched on the company's 700 MHz A Block spectrum, which it has not yet sold after putting it on the block in 2012. "If a transaction makes sense, then we'll execute the transaction," he said. "If it doesn't, then we'll deploy it."

 

Idk much about the 700 MHz spectrum let a lone the A block spectrum but I do know sprint has stated they wanted more lower frequency spectrum. Do you think it will be smart for sprint to obtain some of it?

 

Or will it better if sprint waits for the 600mhz auction?

 

 

Read more http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizons-shammo-lte-capacity-issues-will-be-worked-out-year-end/2013-11-12

 

 

Random: Didn't sprint and cspire sign a roaming agreement for the 700 MHz spectrum

C Spire is using Sprint LTE where needed but it is not the other way around. My device would scan but not authenticate to C Spire LTE.

Posted

Now that we have 40-60 Mbps speeds being performed on the Sprint network in the field, I also see a potential shift in the customer base in the near future. It would be nice to see VoLTE soon with the possible addition of the 600 MHz spectrum. A quad-band LTE phone with simultaneous voice and data sounds like a nice upgrade from my current tri-band G2.

Posted

Now that we have 40-60 Mbps speeds being performed on the Sprint network in the field, I also see a potential shift in the customer base in the near future. It would be nice to see VoLTE soon with the possible addition of the 600 MHz spectrum. A quad-band LTE phone with simultaneous voice and data sounds like a nice upgrade from my current tri-band G2.

 

Most people could care less about whether they have 40 megabits or 5, it's not going to have a "shift" of customers due to it.  The masses just care if their facebook pulls up and they can watch their cat videos on youtube.

  • Like 2
Posted

Most people could care less about whether they have 40 megabits or 5, it's not going to have a "shift" of customers due to it.  The masses just care if their facebook pulls up and they can watch their cat videos on youtube.

I'm sure there are plenty of customers out there who are closer to Ricky Bobby and just wanna go fast..

Posted

Most people could care less about whether they have 40 megabits or 5, it's not going to have a "shift" of customers due to it.  The masses just care if their facebook pulls up and they can watch their cat videos on youtube.

 

Meow Meow

Posted

Most people could care less about whether they have 40 megabits or 5, it's not going to have a "shift" of customers due to it.  The masses just care if their facebook pulls up and they can watch their cat videos on youtube.

 

I'm sure there are plenty of customers out there who are closer to Ricky Bobby and just wanna go fast..

 

Cat videos and ePenis comparisons may consume 90% of all bandwidth use....

  • Like 1
Posted

One thing I do appreciate is Verizon's honesty on this issue. Sprint should get used to making press releases like these and should have for its latest triband phone issue. The key is to never underestimate your customers and not say something because you don't believe they will understand it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

I'm glad Verizon finally fessed up (sort of) to the bottlenecking I have observed in parts of their LTE network the past year. I have experienced more less than 1Mbps speed tests than greater than 20Mbps.

 

However, they make it sound like it's a few sites in just the largest cities in America. But it's in every state I have used VZW LTE service. Sometimes in small cities. In fact, the worst VZW LTE site I have ever encountered was in Farmington, New Mexico. Here in South Dakota, about 1/3 of the sites bog down below VZW's posted LTE speeds. And two will drop to 1Mbps or less. So this is not just a big city problem.

 

Verizon needs a denser LTE 750 network, and they need Band 4 LTE deployed nationwide. Not just the big cities. If they want to maintain their 70 share in places like Rapid City, they will need to overlay it all.

 

It sounds like VZW is on the case. However, I noticed these strains on their network over a year ago. And it has steadily degraded since even then.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

Posted

How cute. Verizon dropping half a milli. How much has sprint dropped on infrastructure upgrades this year alone?

Posted

http://daringfireball.net/linked/2013/11/13/verizon-citiesJohn Gruber: "Verizon LTE has gone to s*** in Midtown Manhattan." More anecdotal evidence, but lots of people responding to him on Twitter back him up on it.

You don't have to tell me twice! My mom on Verizon can't use her iPhone in Midtown while I get more reliabke service than her on 3G and 4G.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Spent a lot of time in Westchester this weekend, specifically Yonkers and White Plains. I mapped three AT&T Nokia -> Ericsson conversions. I was super impressed with T-Mobile's macro density and not so much with AT&T's. In Yonkers it seems like T-Mobile macros outnumber AT&T macros 3 to 1 and in White Plains, 2 to 1. Another surprise was the lack of small cells on AT&T in both cities. While Cellmapper shows White Plains having no small cells, I did manage to find one in the Church Street neighborhood. While it's only one, it's an indication to me that T-Mobile intends on expanding n41 density with small cells in the city. On the other hand, in Yonkers T-Mobile has a ton of LTE small cells but none of them have been upgraded to 5G yet as far as I can tell. Crown Castle has been moving super fast in NYC and Long Island to upgrade and install new 5G small cells so I can only assume it's either a permitting or backhaul issue that's stopping them from moving full steam ahead there. — — — — — Came across this cool site in Yonkers with Verizon, T-Mobile, and Dish present.
    • Other two sectors finally installed. Hopefully it goes live soon though I know from past experience that these new builds can take weeks and in some cases months to go live.
    • Which is not surprising given that Verizon’s entire 5G network consists of only C-band and mmWave in most of their coverage area. I’m more surprised that despite having a 5G network that’s almost entirely made up of only two super fast and super high capacity bands, both T-Mobile and AT&T showed higher average speeds on 5G according to OpenSignal. I would’ve expected Verizon to be a close second to T-Mobile but it was a blowout. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...