Jump to content

Google Voice


Recommended Posts

When the new hangouts app came out with SCE support, I decided to try and disable Google voice and let me say, the call quality is night and day better without Google voice. For others that have horrible call quality, maybe it's Google to blame vice sprint. My hate of Google grows with every new thing they touch (Reference Google maps)

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the new hangouts app came out with SCE support, I decided to try and disable Google voice and let me say, the call quality is night and day better without Google voice. For others that have horrible call quality, maybe it's Google to blame vice sprint. My hate of Google grows with every new thing they touch (Reference Google maps)

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Stupid autocorrect. I meant to say SMS support. And the reason Google Voice is important is because the new hangouts app SMS support doesn't support Google voice numbers until next year. The important point though is that Google voice kills voice quality

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, despite its name, what does Google Voice have to do with voice quality?

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stupid autocorrect. I meant to say SMS support. And the reason Google Voice is important is because the new hangouts app SMS support doesn't support Google voice numbers until next year. The important point though is that Google voice kills voice quality

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

I have to agree with AJ.... Google Voice has nothing to do with your actual Voice calls... it's not a VoIP service, all it does is handle SMS (if you choose to allow it to do so) and voicemail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree with AJ.... Google Voice has nothing to do with your actual Voice calls... it's not a VoIP service, all it does is handle SMS (if you choose to allow it to do so) and voicemail.

And international calls. With google voice intergration international calls are routed through Gv or at least the charges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Google Voice does do some VoIP stuff. You can set up GrooveIP, or answer calls via GMail. With gvoice call forwarding or integration, all voice calls go through them at some point.

 

That being said, I've personally found my voice calls sound better using GrooveIP for VoIP calling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Google Voice does do some VoIP stuff. You can set up GrooveIP, or answer calls via GMail. With gvoice call forwarding or integration, all voice calls go through them at some point.

 

The VoIP capability is not Google Voice, per se.  Rather, it is Google Chat.  To use GrooVeIP, for example, you have to tick the box in your Voice settings to forward to Chat.

 

Honestly, the divisions among Google Voice, Chat, Talk, and Hangouts are quite confusing.  I think everything will be centralized soon within Hangouts -- maybe under yet a different name, though, as Hangouts sounds too slangy.  I am sure that Google would like to include a native VoIP client, but the wireless operators are basically implying, if not outright saying "Don't you dare do that."

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, despite its name, what does Google Voice have to do with voice quality?

 

AJ

 

If you have the Sprint/Google Voice integration, you can have your calls are at least partially routed through Google's servers (including calls made over the native sprint network and the native phone interface)  

 

You have the ability to initiate call recording, and it some cases, transfer calls from one phone to another or to gmail.  As well as have incoming calls simultaneously ring multiple locations.

 

Google will also intercept international calls and route them itself.

 

So it's certainly possible for GV to affect voice quality.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have found that the Google Voice integration can sound ok and sometimes so bad I have to hang up and call again.

 

The same for incoming call, sometimes there is a beep every so many seconds, its weird, like someone pressed a key on their phone.

 

This is when the international integration is used from a Sprint phone in a sprint area, and also when in a roaming area.

 

To use the Google voice in a Sprint area, I just dial the +number directly.

 

To use Google voice in a  roaming area, I have to dial my own number and then the password and then the 011 number.

Can't use the Google voice +number dialing directly when roaming, have to be in a Sprint area.

 

A third party is involving in the voice routing, can't recall which it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have found that the Google Voice integration can sound ok and sometimes so bad I have to hang up and call again.

 

The same for incoming call, sometimes there is a beep every so many seconds, its weird, like someone pressed a key on their phone.

 

This is when the international integration is used from a Sprint phone in a sprint area, and also when in a roaming area.

 

To use the Google voice in a Sprint area, I just dial the +number directly.

 

To use Google voice in a  roaming area, I have to dial my own number and then the password and then the 011 number.

Can't use the Google voice +number dialing directly when roaming, have to be in a Sprint area.

 

A third party is involving in the voice routing, can't recall which it is.

 

Broadband.com iirc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bandwidth.com used to be the underlying carrier for GV but I believe the last time I checked it was Level 3, maybe it depends on the number. I can check numbers if anyone is interested using a basic telecom tool I have access to for work. (I work for the 4th largest carrier in the country). Level 3 is a major league carrier, but all this means is that they are terminating the call on the pstn or public switched telephone network, or even more basic converting it from voip to "standard" analog.

 

I am a GV (sprint integration) user and I have noticed call quality issues as well. I have also perceived a delay in getting ring-back, it seems like the calls take longer to set up. I believe that Sprint phones are actually dialing into some type of server, delivering a terminating number to that server and then waiting for the server to make a call to the final terminating number and then that server bridges the two together. 

 

Likely that server is owned by Google. Google is then converting calls to voip and then delivering them in packet form to Level 3 who does the rest. It is possible that this is not accurate, but I bet it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.....

I am a GV (sprint integration) user and I have noticed call quality issues as well. I have also perceived a delay in getting ring-back, it seems like the calls take longer to set up. I believe that Sprint phones are actually dialing into some type of server, delivering a terminating number to that server and then waiting for the server to make a call to the final terminating number and then that server bridges the two together. 

 

...

 

I've seen the same thing as I brought up in this thread:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4927-connection-lag-when-making-phone-calls/

Taking a long time for ring-back, many times missing calls, missing and late texts.  I've turned off Google Voice integration and will try just forwarding my voicemail to GV instead.  The integration (for me, anyway) just doesn't work well enough to be trusted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have transitioned from full integration to voicemail integration only for the same reasons. 

 

Also, I did run both of my google voice numbers through Neustar and both are with Bandwidth.com. I would have bet seeing Level 3 at some point but maybe I was wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure that Google would like to include a native VoIP client, but the wireless operators are basically implying, if not outright saying "Don't you dare do that."

 

Which is weird, because it's data that most of the operators are trying to cap. Voice and SMS is a giveaway, a mirror image of the situation 5 years ago. You'd figure they'd want people using as much data as they could charge for, capacity allowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure that Google would like to include a native VoIP client, but the wireless operators are basically implying, if not outright saying "Don't you dare do that."

 

AJ

 

They're allowing VoIP calls over GV in the new iOS Hangouts app:

 

http://lifehacker.com/google-hangouts-for-ios-adds-free-voice-calling-1449196714

 

I don't know why they haven't implemented it yet in Android, but you can bet it's coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're allowing VoIP calls over GV in the new iOS Hangouts app:

 

http://lifehacker.com/google-hangouts-for-ios-adds-free-voice-calling-1449196714

 

I don't know why they haven't implemented it yet in Android, but you can bet it's coming.

 

Possibly waiting until the middle of the 2014, when all the third party apps (Groove IP etc) are kicked off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, despite its name, what does Google Voice have to do with voice quality?

 

AJ

 

Pretty sure it is handled differently.  When I was playing around with running my own voip gateway, I noticed increased latency when using Google voice integration vs when not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...