Jump to content

Sprint testing Samsung, Alcatel-Lucent indoor small cells


IamMrFamous07
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

 

Sprint (NYSE:S) has received LTE-enabled small cells from its infrastructure vendors Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE:ALU) and Samsung and is testing the devices for planned deployment.

 

"We are currently testing indoor picos for both vendors. We haven't announced a deployment timeline yet," Sprint spokeswoman Kelly Schlageter told FierceWirelessTech.

 

She added that the picocells are designed for use on Sprint's FDD LTE network in the 1.9 GHz band.

 

 

 

Read more: Sprint testing Samsung, Alcatel-Lucent indoor small cells - FierceWirelessTech http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/sprint-testing-samsung-alcatel-lucent-indoor-small-cells/2013-10-27#ixzz2j4X2FNeT

Subscribe at

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've been talking about small cells since NV started, so this isn't exactly breaking news, but at least it's confirmation that Sprint is still going to deploy them.

 

The real take away for me here is that they didn't list Ericsson even though they have a small cell solution (although I don't know if it would work for Sprint).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's skip indoor 1900 and go straight to 2600 :-)

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

I just don't get the 2600 thing. Why would ppl push so hard for a band that doesn't travel as far or have good penetration. I understand using it to offload user from other bands to free up congestion. 800 should be priority to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't get the 2600 thing. Why would ppl push so hard for a band that doesn't travel as far or have good penetration. I understand using it to offload user from other bands to free up congestion. 800 should be priority to me.

 

For indoor small cells the 2600 thing (as well as 1900 apparently) is actually an ideal solution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't get the 2600 thing. Why would ppl push so hard for a band that doesn't travel as far or have good penetration. I understand using it to offload user from other bands to free up congestion. 800 should be priority to me.

The indoor small cells are supposed to fill in the band 41 gaps in coverage. Having and indoor 800 site would kinda be redundant. would you want it penetrate walls to go back outside where there should already be coverage?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How "big" of an area are they using small cella for, are we talking for a small neighborhood, or a high volume store, shopping centers? I think aomething that could help would residence offering to let sprint use their property, say on top of the roof, to install and feed fiber too, a small cell for lower coverage area/poor performance area? Would that even be possible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see I live in a wooded area. Would like to have some coverage more out side of my house. 800 Could help in a place like a hospital where you might need to penetrate several walls it to get coverage through out a building and you would need less small cell sites to keep cost down. Beside if coverage to much, you can always turn down the power. I think see the benefit of this also seeing how the Airave 2.5 Plus has band 26 in it.  If Band 26 wasn't a benefit then they would have just left it as Band 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't get the 2600 thing. Why would ppl push so hard for a band that doesn't travel as far or have good penetration. I understand using it to offload user from other bands to free up congestion. 800 should be priority to me.

Because lte 2600 is going to be the band that's going to give sprint amazing speeds. Speed wise, sprint lte on 800 and 1900 won't be able to produce amazing speeds like you see with the other carriers and lte 2600 is designed for heavy capacity which the others bands are not.

 

Just the basis of it.

 

 

Sprint plans to get more power band spectrum (600 mhz) but the auction won't be until 2014 or 2015 I think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Budweiser, Scotts, Nestle, Avon and Wendy's all have Picos here in Columbus that have been 3G accepted and some have Scheduled LTE 1.9 dates. I'm not sure who the vendor is, but they have them rocking already.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the idea here is that the 1900 MHZ antennas will impact the highest number of subscribers with Sprint LTE. The user base at this point has been using 1900 LTE devices for over a year, and we are only now starting to see dual and tri band handsets. Also, as far as signal strength for these indoor deployments is concerned, tweaking the power settings should eliminate any shortfalls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So are we talking about maybe a new Airave or strictly for places like big buildings? I would love to get an Airave LTE! :)

 

While a new airave is possible in the future, I think this testing is for larger equipment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For indoor small cells the 2600 thing (as well as 1900 apparently) is actually an ideal solution. 

 

I think you are right. I can't see 800 being deployed anywhere but large (tower) sites. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 2.5+ right now and there's no 800mhz cdma...

I believe I've read that the 2.5+ is transmitting an 800SMR Beacon.  Your device may not be able to connect to it, but it seems to be capable of it.  Perhaps someone more "in-the-know" will chime in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So are we talking about maybe a new Airave or strictly for places like big buildings? I would love to get an Airave LTE! :)

I've seen several people saying this, but if you have an Airave you already have DSL or cable broadband, so why in the world would you need LTE?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen several people saying this, but if you have an Airave you already have DSL or cable broadband, so why in the world would you need LTE?

To abuse the network? Duh.... (Just kidding, that would be pretty stupid of me, and it aint right)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've seen several people saying this, but if you have an Airave you already have DSL or cable broadband, so why in the world would you need LTE?

Well let's take it out of the home setting and put it into the commercial setting: shopping malls, airports, subways, college campuses, corporate warehouses and distribution centers (say Limited Brands which I know for sure). These are all locations that maybe you just don't want to have public WiFi. Now you have an indoor pico type system with one connection to the internet or to the carrier. You as the facility owner don't have to worry about IP addressing, network security nor anything else because it's all on the carrier. 

 

A buddy of mine just finished deploying one of these systems for all the carriers at the Atlanta Airport.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well let's take it out of the home setting and put it into the commercial setting: shopping malls, airports, subways, college campuses, corporate warehouses and distribution centers (say Limited Brands which I know for sure). These are all locations that maybe you just don't want to have public WiFi. Now you have an indoor pico type system with one connection to the internet or to the carrier. You as the facility owner don't have to worry about IP addressing, network security nor anything else because it's all on the carrier.

 

A buddy of mine just finished deploying one of these systems for all the carriers at the Atlanta Airport.

Okay, the concept of small cells I get and that makes perfect sense. But I don't think an actual Airave would work for that because you can only have a limited number of connections to it at once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe I've read that the 2.5+ is transmitting an 800SMR Beacon.  Your device may not be able to connect to it, but it seems to be capable of it.  Perhaps someone more "in-the-know" will chime in.

 

It broadcasts essentially a beacon on 800Mhz so your phone will connect to the Airave even if there is a tower close enough for your phone to see that 800MHz signal. The actual connection made with the Airave is still 1900MHz, but that 800 beacon means the Airave will be prioritized even if another 800 signal is detected (since it will likely be more powerful than the macro signal).

 

This is because some phones prioritize 800 over 1900, and were thus switching back and forth between a macro 800 signal and the Airave 1900 signal causing the exact issues an Airave is designed to avoid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Or, more simply, have a physical SIM that I can just move from one device to another.  Problem [already] solved.  Carrier doesn't have to be involved at any point in the process. I'll be among many (I'm sure) who will be glad to know if you see it.  Here in the DC area, Dish hasn't really done much yet.  I think I've seen some Dish gear around Richmond, but nothing here. - Trip
    • I like VICE.  They actually report on news no one else is willing to report. A lot of the places they go no sane person would want to be there.  They put their life on the line in many cases to get a story. From stories about the avocado wars in Mexico, being in the front lines against ISIS and Ukraine, to being embedded with terrorist organizations.   FAA might have some conspiracy 5G nut on their team or something.  At work ever year we have some one come in and say "hey, can you turn off the WIFI in my room? I don't want its radiation".  It doesn't make sense and their reasoning is always uneducated conspiracy. I can see someone coming into my office and acting crazy over C band disregarding everything else.
    • I think on esims it depends on how they implement it. If you can freely activate them on one phone while having it loaded on many that would be great.   I will let you know when I see Boost Mobile native 5g live here. So far no sign of even the plmn being active which I figure will be my first indicator. I look at changing networks with the TNX Sim and seem to get a full list of all carriers and their alternate plmns.
    • This is a result of the change I mentioned above, sparked by @PedroDaGr8 trying to log AT&T cells with a non-AT&T SIM that was reporting "out of service" but still capturing cell info. For the moment (subject to change as I keep testing and getting feedback), the "Connecting to" prefix will disappear when you connect in a scenario like that. I may adjust it to show a special prefix like "Limited LTE" or "No Data LTE" to make it more clear what is going on, but I also need to make sure that's only appearing at the proper times. When you were seeing just "LTE" in your screenshots, was there anything unusual about your connection? I see the app indicated you couldn't make calls; could you transfer data? Can you send a diagnostic report next time you see that?   I'm seeing this more frequently, unfortunately -- it has something to do with Android's power saving efforts I believe. Was the app in the foreground when it happened? When the screen updates, the notification and home screen widget are also updated -- but as seen with the widget for the past couple of years, Android doesn't always execute the update. I'm constantly trying to find ways around these limitations, since the app is useless if it's displaying stale data.
    • Bleh, hope not.  The eSIM is a huge step backwards to the bad old days and I have no desire to encourage their use. But in any event, maybe I should get Boost service, then, if people are already seeing it.  I can use it for AT&T until Dish native gear goes live in this area.  Have to ponder that a bit. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...