Jump to content

AT&T to launch their first VoLTE smartphone before years end?


ericdabbs

Recommended Posts

According to AT&T they are planning on launching a VoLTE smartphone before years end with a wider selection of VoLTE phones in the first half of 2014.

 

I am glad that AT&T and Verizon are both launching a VoLTE smartphone before years end to do the guinea pig testing.  I know Sprint and Tmobile will be watching and staying on the sidelines hoping to figure out lessons learned as they continue to build out their nationwide LTE network.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/att-expects-launch-first-volte-smartphone-year/2013-10-08

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TIME OUT! Everyone on here has bragged about how only T-Mobile and Sprint will be able to upgrade to release 10 LTE-A and now At&t is claiming it can jump from release 8 to release 10 via software update? WTF!

 

Surprise!!! (said in a Gomer Pyle voice). I think only Verizon was thought to have needed site visits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but everyone made it seem like sprint could have LTE advanced before everyone else and that's not the case at all. Verizon is so far in the LTE game that even if they have to physically go to towers they could still finish first.

Surprise!!! (said in a Gomer Pyle voice). I think only Verizon was thought to have needed site visits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am guessing because ATT used RRUs for the LTE build out from the very beginning so they just need a software upgrade.  Maybe since Verizon didn't use RRUs for their 700 MHz LTE rollout that they need to go back to the towers and upgrade its equipment to use RRUs going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but everyone made it seem like sprint could have LTE advanced before everyone else and that's not the case at all. Verizon is so far in the LTE game that even if they have to physically go to towers they could still finish first.

I've never heard anyone around here say that AT&T couldn't do LTE Advanced with their given equipment. You were making assumptions. Don't blame us that you assumed something.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so i am just curious... for non smart phone users (flip phones and such) will VoLTE affect them negatively? lol my dad still is getting used to using his iphone compared to his simple moto renegade flip phone :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been hearing that forever. I must have interpreted wrong. Shame I was looking foward to having it soon. Then again I'm still waiting on wide spread 1900 LTE.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk now Free

I think you are misremembering, Verizon used rel 8, but I think AT&T mostly used rel 9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been hearing that forever. I must have interpreted wrong. Shame I was looking foward to having it soon. Then again I'm still waiting on wide spread 1900 LTE.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk now Free

 

LTE Advanced is pointless at the moment when not even half of the 39K Sprint sites still have not been upgraded to LTE yet.  So to me I don't mind if LTE Advanced on Sprint doesn't get deployed until mid 2014 when NV 1.0 should be wrapping up for the most part.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

VoLTE-compliant device launching this year doesn't mean they'll actually have commercial VoLTE service this year. They've carefully avoided talking about that part.

 

#RememberLGRevolutionFrom2011?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard online scuttlebutt about AT&T testing VoLTE in certain markets, but I don't think that counts for anything. AT&T beating VZW to VoLTE would be interesting, if for no other reason than it's probably easier for 3GPP carriers to go to VoLTE earlier due to eSRVCC. I take it VZW and Sprint will wait until they have LTE over their footprint.

 

While it's possible for CDMA carriers to implement SRVCC, it seems as if Verizon and Sprint aren't going to use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to hear. 

 

Looks like AT&T (and Verizon) will be pioneers of Carrier Aggregation too.  I remember reading on here where people were trying to  paint AT&T as a carrier of limited spectrum and no path for LTE-A.  Looks like this is not the case.  Just because it ain't greenfiled doesn't mean it can't be done.  

 

AT&T has plenty of PCS and Cellular spectrum to re-purpose for their Aggregation strategy.  In the next 2 years I'm interested to see how they plan to use WCS.

 

Although AT&T plans to cover over 300 million with LTE by mid next year with their initial LTE phase from all accounts VoLTE can fall back seamlessly onto their HSPA network for calls outside of LTE's reach.  This is a good strategy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T desperately needs LTE-A to stay competitive with the rest. They're mixing and matching 5Mhz/10Mhz in various markets as they have almost no contiguous clean spectrum swaths that are larger than 15Mhz FDD.

 

Verizon doesn't need LTE-A in immediate future they have clean chunks for 20Mhz FDD LTE in many markets. That'll also help battery life on the terminal side, as the UE radio avoids two streams/twice the processing power drawn.

 

T-Movile has quite a few markets with 2x20Mhz options planned out for 2014/15 time frame, and Sprint can just open its wings and fly on the insane amount of 2.6Ghz band from Clearwire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Milan said.

 

Carrier aggregation isn't the best tech when it comes to battery life. AT&T has loads of spectrum but lots of it is fragmented.

 

However they are sitting on one band that has massive potential for 15x15 in lots of areas. That's their ridiculous PCS holdings. If they can launch VoLTE that frees up more carriers for LTE.

 

Looking at RootMetrics it seems as if AT&T is getting better network performance across markets but the PCS refarming isn't going to be easy. It will be like trying to play Jenga with that network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Milan said.

 

Carrier aggregation isn't the best tech when it comes to battery life. AT&T has loads of spectrum but lots of it is fragmented.

 

However they are sitting on one band that has massive potential for 15x15 in lots of areas. That's their ridiculous PCS holdings. If they can launch VoLTE that frees up more carriers for LTE.

 

Looking at RootMetrics it seems as if AT&T is getting better network performance across markets but the PCS refarming isn't going to be easy. It will be like trying to play Jenga with that network.

Oh how quickly you forget about WCS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of handsets that use the MDM9615 baseband could be updated for VoLTE... right? *crickets*

 

Also, most of AT&T's WCS is 10x10 IIRC. It still has to be aggregated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of handsets that use the MDM9615 baseband could be updated for VoLTE... right? *crickets*

 

Also, most of AT&T's WCS is 10x10 IIRC. It still has to be aggregated.

Why do you have to aggregate a 10x10? If you make the band priority properly, then that can buy them enough time to work on refarming PCS 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, most of AT&T's WCS is 10x10 IIRC. It still has to be aggregated.

Why do you have to aggregate a 10x10? If you make the band priority properly, then that can buy them enough time to work on refarming PCS 

 

Reconfigured WCS 2300 MHz licenses are 5 MHz FDD.  But the A and B blocks are adjacent, so they can be used together for 10 MHz FDD, much as AT&T uses the Lower 700 MHz B and C blocks for 10 MHz FDD.  No carrier aggregation necessary.

 

Oh, and band 2 LTE 1900 will come before band 30 LTE 2300 on AT&T.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reconfigured WCS 2300 MHz licenses are 5 MHz FDD.  But the A and B blocks are adjacent, so they can be used together for 10 MHz FDD, much as AT&T uses the Lower 700 MHz B and C blocks for 10 MHz FDD.  No carrier aggregation necessary.

 

Oh, and band 2 LTE 1900 will come before band 30 LTE 2300 on AT&T.

 

AJ

Exactly, WCS needs to be codified before they even think of deploying it, although I'm sure ALU and Ericsson are all ready for it. But in the near future (aka 2014) they could theoretically refarm PCS at the expense of HSPA, which imho wouldn't be the smoothest user experience, especially in many markets where they still struggle with dropped calls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do they have spectrum that is useless to them?

It was useful for iDEN but little else. What more do you need to know?

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...