Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Long Island Market


RoccoM

Recommended Posts

It's almost as if Sprint saw T-Mobile's pace in Long Island and started to step up their game. 

 

Now I know that is not the case, but it is good to see progress. I want it to get to Bay Shore so that I don't have to stay on slow 3G while visiting my Aunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found the LTE stretches from the Walmart (750 Middle Country Rd  Middle Island, NY 11953) and stretches down all the way to where William Floyd meets....At least that's how far i have made it. I was getting about 5Mbps Download and .50Mbps Up. Using Speedtest app iPhone5.

 

http://image.bayimg.com/fa2ffce2e12e86ae1881d7a2845fee26ead271f9.jpg

 

 

^^ Photo demonstrating area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found the LTE stretches from the Walmart (750 Middle Country Rd Middle Island, NY 11953) and stretches down all the way to where William Floyd meets....At least that's how far i have made it. I was getting about 5Mbps Download and .50Mbps Up. Using Speedtest app iPhone5.

 

http://image.bayimg.com/fa2ffce2e12e86ae1881d7a2845fee26ead271f9.jpg

 

 

^^ Photo demonstrating area.

. Did u map it on sensorly? Edited by Gorge_20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's almost as if Sprint saw T-Mobile's pace in Long Island and started to step up their game.

 

Now I know that is not the case, but it is good to see progress. I want it to get to Bay Shore so that I don't have to stay on slow 3G while visiting my Aunt.

. You do know that there is LTE in Bay Shore? Well now :)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I was in Manhattan yesterday and had zero 4g any where between pen station and Broadway.  My mom has Verizon and had 4g the entire trip on the LIRR and everywhere in the city, even inside buildings.   Hopefully Sprint will eventually be that good but I don't think 4g is realy ready in Manhattan yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in Manhattan yesterday and had zero 4g any where between pen station and Broadway.  My mom has Verizon and had 4g the entire trip on the LIRR and everywhere in the city, even inside buildings.   Hopefully Sprint will eventually be that good but I don't think 4g is realy ready in Manhattan yet.

You basically went to the one place where there is almost no sign of LTE..if you go a bit further north into the 40's there is LTE signal, and into the 20's there is LTE signal as well. But the 30's (Penn station is on 34th street) you have to go as far as 5th ave to get LTE..That area, plus lower manhattan have big Gaps, but the rest of the island has okish outdoor coverage.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dose any one know when will there be 4G LTE in shirley, New York, Long Island, 11967 ?

I volunteer with Shirley Ambulance, today I had 4g all over the shirley and brookhaven area. So the answer to your quesition is today. I also work with one of the private ambulance companies, and I've been seeing 4g service popup everywhere. It's also fast in shirley 25megabits down, 5 up. Very nice. My Galaxy S3 was happy sauce.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was in Lynbrook on Merrick Rd. today and cought LTE between wendys up until Valley Stream. I know NYCHitman's gonna be happy about that one.

 

I think I mapped it on Sensorly, I turned it on at least...

Haha. If only I were still on Sprint :(. However, that is great news for all Sprint subscribers in the Lynbrook area. It doesn't look like it was mapped out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha. If only I were still on Sprint :(. However, that is great news for all Sprint subscribers in the Lynbrook area.

What service provider do you have now?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dose any one know when LTE +A is going to come to Sprint or even if it is going to be going to come available to any U.S.A phone company ex: At&t, T-moble, Verizon, Or Sprint??

Edited by Gorge_20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had full blown LTE this afternoon when I made a stop near Ikea in Hicksville Long Island, more specific on N. Broadway and 17th Street. pretty sweet.

LTE is spreading at little bit faster in L.I. I feel that deployment speeds have picked up since BK & Bronx's launch .

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...