Jump to content

Everything LTE-A


Recommended Posts

TD lte is LTE A.

 

Clearwire's LTE network is LTE-A ready.

 

LTE Advanced

LTE Advanced is a 4G technical standard that calls for peak download mobile speeds of at least 100 Mbps, which far exceeds today's commercial networks. Our LTE network will be "LTE Advanced-ready" meaning that it will use an ultra-high-capacity spectrum configuration that is superior to the typical configuration of the slower, more capacity-constrained commercial LTE network designs in the United States today.

This will include the use of multicarrier, or multichannel, wideband radios that will be carrier aggregation capable. Carrier aggregation is a key feature of LTE Advanced that will enable us to further leverage our vast spectrum depth to create larger "fat pipes" for deploying mobile broadband service.

 

http://www.clearwire.com/company/featured-story

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know.. But for Sprint, We are calling LTE A TD LTE because its more than LTE A

 

Huh?  LTE LTD BVD DVD CD VD...

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is clearwire building out in all major markets?

 

Do you mean will 2500 be used in all markets?  Sprint now owns Clear.  

 

I would think Sprint only needs to do 2500 only where capacity is needed.  That is if 800/1900 hits some level of utilization for a particular site (or is expected to already be high), they deploy 2500.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean will 2500 be used in all markets?  Sprint now owns Clear.  

 

I would think Sprint only needs to do 2500 only where capacity is needed.  That is if 800/1900 hits some level of utilization for a particular site (or is expected to already be high), they deploy 2500.  

 

I think Sprint needs to be proactive/aggressive in rolling out 2500 to compete with the other carriers. Hopefully, it'll increase the overall speeds being dragged down by heavy usage customers and cities with high population densities. I want FASTER SPEEDS NOW damnit!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care much about the carrier aggregation or OFDMA uplink features, but are NV 1.0 at minimum 4x4 MIMO capable? The spectral efficiency benefits there should be large.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Sprint needs to be proactive/aggressive in rolling out 2500 to compete with the other carriers. Hopefully, it'll increase the overall speeds being dragged down by heavy usage customers and cities with high population densities. I want FASTER SPEEDS NOW damnit!!

I translated this post to the following.

 

Baby crying, "mom The jones' speed is faster than mine. I want faster speed so I can have faster speed. Give it to me. My current LTE is working just fine but his is faster!"

 

Hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care much about the carrier aggregation or OFDMA uplink features, but are NV 1.0 at minimum 4x4 MIMO capable? The spectral efficiency benefits there should be large.

 

According to the Iyad Tarazi, NV is capable of 4x4, but I believe that is apart of the LTE-Advanced phase. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Sprint needs to be proactive/aggressive in rolling out 2500 to compete with the other carriers. Hopefully, it'll increase the overall speeds being dragged down by heavy usage customers and cities with high population densities. I want FASTER SPEEDS NOW damnit!!

 

We call posters like this "Veruca Salt."  And, oh, I see Veruca wants her faster speeds NOW...

 

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care much about the carrier aggregation or OFDMA uplink features, but are NV 1.0 at minimum 4x4 MIMO capable? The spectral efficiency benefits there should be large.

Even if it was, you'd need to wait for Cat 5 UE in order to utilize it.

Cat 3, 4 chipsets support 2x2 only.

 

Sent from my GT-I9505G using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I'm confused, are we currently speculating snapdragon 800 devices, like the Note 3 might be, will have LTE-A capability on Sprint? Or are devices in the near future going to work like the hotspots and only use one slice of 20mhz TD-LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE-A isn't a single feature or a switch that you turn on and instantly get 1Gbps peak rates. It's many tools in the toolbox combined to provide a better network experience.

 

Snapdragon 800 for instance supports one of the tools, Carrier Aggregation, and aggregates two separate non contiguous LTE bands doubling the throughput. That said, it only supports up to two 10Mhz Downlink channels so you're effectively achieving peak rates of a single 20Mhz LTE downlink channel. Verizon for instance can achieve the same peak throughput without Carreir Aggregation since they have contiguous 40Mhz of AWS in many markets east of Mississippi. Because of that, they don't need to rush with CA as much as lets say AT&T. Besides, battery life will certainly be shorter on CA devices. See my point?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE is just a marketing term. 

 

LTE-Advanced is just a marketing term. 

 

"4G" as well, just marketing. 

 

Carrier aggregation, spectral efficiency of TDD vs FDD,&2x2 MIMO are the most notable features to me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE is just a marketing term.

What would you have them call it? 4G was inappropriately used up on Wimax and Hspa+, and they didn't have the temerity to call it "5G."

 

I'm curious what they'll call LTE-A (the first actual 4G network) when that arrives. Probably just "our new, more advanced 4G LTE network."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would you have them call it? 4G was inappropriately used up on Wimax and Hspa+, and they didn't have the temerity to call it "5G."

I'm curious what they'll call LTE-A (the first actual 4G network) when that arrives. Probably just "our new, more advanced 4G LTE network."

Let's call it "UHSWIAVMID"

 

Ultra high speed wireless internet access via mobile internet device.

 

Really make it a head scratcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would you have them call it? 4G was inappropriately used up on Wimax and Hspa+...

 

Inappropriate for WiMAX, no.  Inappropriate for HSPA+, yes.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inappropriate for WiMAX, no.  Inappropriate for HSPA+, yes.

 

AJ

 

Mobile WiMAX (802.16e) does not meet IMT-Advanced specs for what is now termed "true 4G" (after bending to marketing pressure from the carriers to obfuscate the reality). Only WiMax-Advanced (802.16m, or Wimax Release 2) and LTE-A (release 10 and up) qualify. All current LTE deployments are still technically 3G transitional technologies (or pre-4G, if you prefer), until updated to Release 10 or higher.

 

If you want to call Sprint's WiMax "4G", then it follows that HSPA+ can also be called that. I personally believe the term "faux-G" is best for those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mobile WiMAX (802.16e) does not meet IMT-Advanced specs for what is now termed "true 4G" (after bending to marketing pressure from the carriers to obfuscate the reality). Only WiMax-Advanced (802.16m, or Wimax Release 2) and LTE-A (release 10 and up) qualify. All current LTE deployments are still technically 3G transitional technologies (or pre-4G, if you prefer), until updated to Release 10 or higher.

 

OFDMA and all IP -- those are the real dictates (or what they should be) for "4G."  WiMAX meets them.  HSPA+ does not.  It is not OFDMA, and it still supports circuit switched voice.  Basing "3G," "4G," or whatever "G" on speeds, potential speeds at that, is just plain stupid.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest marketing term that annoys the crap out of me seems to be "Dual LTE MIMO" that I'm seeing on Moto X leaks, and  Ubuntu EDGE. According to the leaks it "increases the speeds"... wow...

 

Not only that Category 3 and 4 baseband chipsets can't process more than 2x2 MIMO with spatial multiplexing, but also pretty much every phone since HTC Thunderbolt had at least 2 separate LTE antennas, which Release 8 mandates.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...