Jump to content

AT&T Wireless purchases Leap Wireless (Cricket Wireless)


avb

Recommended Posts

AT&T-Leap AWS-1 synergies in the top 100 markets:

 

Andrew J Shepherd (@WiWavelength) tweeted at 11:04 AM on Sat, Jul 13, 2013:

Acquiring Leap is a way for AT&T to restore its lost AWS in the top 100 mkts, going from 24 back up to 68 mkts. http://t.co/acvpvhy4Ih

(https://twitter.com/WiWavelength/status/356081629753655296)

 

AJ

AJ, what's the market that has 40 Mhz of combined spectrum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T-Leap. 

 

Is this what you are seeking?

 

10dfhcl.png

 

Leap PCS does little for AT&T outside of the Pacific Northwest -- Seattle and Portland, which were Cingular sore spots prior to the AT&TWS merger nine years ago.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you could do a stacked chart of them (with ATT one color and Leap another) for an assortment of markets.

 

I already did produce a stacked chart in my referenced tweet.  But I was mobile at the time and could not post an image inline here in The Forums.  Let me fix that now...

 

2gw53wx.png

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this what you are seeking?

 

10dfhcl.png

 

Leap PCS does little for AT&T outside of the Pacific Northwest -- Seattle and Portland, which were Cingular sore spots prior to the AT&TWS merger nine years ago.

 

AJ

 

Thanks, AJ, they do add capacity in some markets! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ, what's the market that has 40 Mhz of combined spectrum?

 

CMA045 is Oklahoma City, which may have the highest AT&T market share of any top 100 metro in the country.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMA045 is Oklahoma City, which may have the highest AT&T market share of any top 100 metro in the country.

 

AJ

Where can we find the "top x markets" without having to ask you?

 

Or a spreadsheet would also be good.

Edited by hxnk134
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMA045 is Oklahoma City, which may have the highest AT&T market share of any top 100 metro in the country.

 

AJ

Wasn't OKC where the supposed AT&T AWS LTE was that you debunked? In any case, OKC seems a little odd that it would be the highest and not it's home market

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where can we find the "top x markets" without having to ask you? Or a spreadsheet would also be good.

 

CMAs are based on MSAs from the 1980 or 1990 Census.

 

http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=maps

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't OKC where the supposed AT&T AWS LTE was that you debunked? In any case, OKC seems a little odd that it would be the highest and not it's home market

 

I did not exactly debunk the AWS LTE report.  Back in December, I drove 700 miles roundtrip to Oklahoma City but did not find any AWS LTE downtown, at the airport, at Penn Square Mall, in Edmond, nor in Moore -- as an aside, I ran my RF sweeps in Moore at the I-35 interchange where the EF5 tornado would cross the highway a few months later.  However, the AWS LTE reports continued to come in, though they were oddly localized to Mustang and Yukon, both just southwest of the metro.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not exactly debunk the AWS LTE report.  Back in December, I drove 700 miles roundtrip to Oklahoma City but did not find any AWS LTE downtown, at the airport, at Penn Square Mall, in Edmond, nor in Moore -- as an aside, I ran my RF sweeps in Moore at the I-35 interchange where the EF5 tornado would cross the highway a few months later.  However, the AWS LTE reports continued to come in, though they were oddly localized to Mustang and Yukon, both just southwest of the metro.

 

AJ

 

Ah, I see. Back on topic, if the Leap deal goes through, hopefully AT&T will go back to AWS LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, I see. Back on topic, if the Leap deal goes through, hopefully AT&T will go back to AWS LTE.

 

I would say that is a given.  One of my first pronouncements when the deal was announced was that AT&T was buying back in to the AWS-1 game.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that is a given. One of my first pronouncements when the deal was announced was that AT&T was buying back in to the AWS-1 game.

 

AJ

Do you think any PCS divestitures would be required? And would FCC allow Verizon to participate to outbid Sprint?

Sprint may have missed out on the Leap purchase but 10 MHz PCS in each market makes for a fine consolation prize.

Edited by hxnk134
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think any PCS divestitures would be required? And would FCC allow Verizon to participate to outbid Sprint?

In my opinion, the FCC should require divestiture so that:

  • They should not have more than 30Mhz of AWS in any one market upon completion of the merger.
  • Their combined PCS + AWS in any market should not exceed 60Mhz upon completion of the merger.

And finally my blanket rule for all mergers involving ATT and VZW: Require them to divest any Cell 850 spectrum so they own no more than half the Cell 850 spectrum in a given market. They can do this through spectrum swaps or sales if they'd like. It's just stupid to have ATT or VZW owning both the A and B sides of the spectrum in a given market (or even all of one side and part of another). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think any PCS divestitures would be required? And would FCC allow Verizon to participate to outbid Sprint? Sprint may have missed out on the Leap purchase but 10 MHz PCS in each market makes for a fine consolation prize.

If they do end up have to divestiture some PCS then that could end up being then actually buying Leap, provided Sprint is able to acquire said PCS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Sprint should take a page from Dish's play book and overbid ATT by 10-15% just to force ATT to spend more money lol.

Maybe crazy Charlie will do it for us.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will only be a matter of time before USCC will be picked up at this rate. I wonder who the winner of that company will be.

Now USCC is a different beast, right? No way FCC would let ATT or VZW buy them.

 

Definitely it's inevitable that Sprint will buy them.

 

Also, they should think about Cspire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish there was a way for ATT and Sprint to buy Leap together. ATT would get the AWS spectrum and Sprint would get the PCS spectrum.

That's what's possibly gonna happen anyway: FCC might force ATT to divest some PCS. Someone mentioned ATT might require that if Sprint buys PCS, they have to host the CDMA customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what's possibly gonna happen anyway: FCC might force ATT to divest some PCS. Someone mentioned ATT might require that if Sprint buys PCS, they have to host the CDMA customers.

 

I am sure ATT and Sprint can work something out that will benefit both companies.  Sprint needs to acquire more PCS spectrum in general but especially in those 20 MHz markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure ATT and Sprint can work something out that will benefit both companies. Sprint needs to acquire more PCS spectrum in general but especially in those 20 MHz markets.

ATT is not gonna "work something out" eith anyone unless it's forced by the FCC or DOJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...