Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE- North LA Market


BenJDitzel

Recommended Posts

Great are they working from Oxnard up to nipomo then.

No, they are working sites wherever/whenever they are ready. They are not working one particular area then moving to another.

 

There have been less completed full build sites up north than there have been in the southern part of the market.... at least so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2

I think were going to get it in ventura here in the next month the pace they are going.. me beimg at the east end I might be able to get some of oxnards if another tower goes live

That's sounds pretty reasonable since they are a fair amount of sites that are 3G accepted already. I'm guessing all waiting on backhaul to fire up LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So once 3G is accepted. 4g will start which they get the fiber from whoever in nipomo area. So my earlier post way back ago has 3G been oked

Yes

 

If I remember correctly, only 1 full build site has been accepted in Santa Maria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So will they work on it in Santa Maria for 4g or do they want to wait for more to be accepted to do more than one tower.

 

They will work on it once backhaul becomes ready. They do not need to bring up 4G in clusters.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Permit I just saw on the Ventura county website:

 

Modification/Upgrade to an existing
wireless telecommunications
facility-Remove 3 existing antennas and
install 3 new antennas. Install 1 fiber
junction box, retrofit 1 modcell equipment
cabinet, install 6RRHs. Install 2 new
liquid tight conduits from MMBTs to
J-Box, Replace GPS unit.

928 CUMMINGS RD, SANTA
PAULA, CA 93060

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Permit I just saw on the Ventura county website:

 

Modification/Upgrade to an existing

wireless telecommunications

facility-Remove 3 existing antennas and

install 3 new antennas. Install 1 fiber

junction box, retrofit 1 modcell equipment

cabinet, install 6RRHs. Install 2 new

liquid tight conduits from MMBTs to

J-Box, Replace GPS unit.

928 CUMMINGS RD, SANTA

PAULA, CA 93060

So santa paula is getting 4g next?

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since cellphone companies get fiber from telephone companies we have some in my area like AT&T and charter for telephone and internet providers. Does it matter where they get the internet from for cell towers cause AT&T sucks for speed. I was just wondering cause using charter for Internet aka server to get to Internet on phones is lightning fast. Charter gets between 30 and 100 download and AT&T like 1.5 MBs download.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since cellphone companies get fiber from telephone companies we have some in my area like AT&T and charter for telephone and internet providers. Does it matter where they get the internet from for cell towers cause AT&T sucks for speed. I was just wondering cause using charter for Internet aka server to get to Internet on phones is lightning fast. Charter gets between 30 and 100 download and AT&T like 1.5 MBs download.

It doesn't matter who they get it from, as long as has the specs they require.

 

They aren't using the same sort of connection that you get for home service. Those generally don't have the SLA's that they need for uptime, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since cellphone companies get fiber from telephone companies we have some in my area like AT&T and charter for telephone and internet providers. Does it matter where they get the internet from for cell towers cause AT&T sucks for speed. I was just wondering cause using charter for Internet aka server to get to Internet on phones is lightning fast. Charter gets between 30 and 100 download and AT&T like 1.5 MBs download.

AT&T fiber for commercial applications is a whole different type of ball game compared to UVerse or DSL. AT&T's fiber Ethernet is reliable to the 9's and plenty fast to give Sprint NV cells all the bandwidth they need. I wouldn't be too concerned about AT&T's backhaul services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok how long does it take for AT&T to get the back haul ready for sprint 4g

I don't think anyone knows outside of Sprint or ATT how long it takes for a circuit to go live from the time the orders were placed.

 

For my work, it took about 8 months for them to get the fiber live. The actual physical work was done about a month after the contract was signed. We were told there was a backbone project that needed be done before we could go live.

 

Typical install times are supposed to be 90-120 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone knows outside of Sprint or ATT how long it takes for a circuit to go live from the time the orders were placed.

 

For my work, it took about 8 months for them to get the fiber live. The actual physical work was done about a month after the contract was signed. We were told there was a backbone project that needed be done before we could go live.

 

Typical install times are supposed to be 90-120 days.

so the one by your work is suppose to go live soon?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so the one by your work is suppose to go live soon?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2

I don't think so, there was no fiber there last week when I checked. The site is about a mile away from my work.

 

Even though it was one of the first full build sites to go live in Ventura, I don't think it'll be one of the first to get LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so, there was no fiber there last week when I checked. The site is about a mile away from my work.

 

Even though it was one of the first full build sites to go live in Ventura, I don't think it'll be one of the first to get LTE.

Maybe the one by my house will :D its the closest to oxnard which just went live

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So by the time 4g gets covered in nipomo it will be 2014. Right or wrong.

all markets are suppose to have sufficent 4g coverage in 2014 so right in a way it may be sooner tho once it hits sb I would start getting your hopes up

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...