Jump to content

Comments related to the NV Running List Thread


Recommended Posts

Can't get backhaul to support it at the site location. Could not negotiate changing the leases with the site owner. Zoning changes that allow grandfathered operations but not new operations. And I am sure there are others. However, it is such a small fraction of sites that will not get LTE 1900 that is almost not worth noting.

 

Robert

 

Ah, well that makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any word on the "West Iowa/Nebraska" market? I understand they are working more densely populated areas first but Omaha is the 42nd most populous city. Just curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any word on the "West Iowa/Nebraska" market? I understand they are working more densely populated areas first but Omaha is the 42nd most populous city. Just curious.

 

It is not in the first two rounds of Network Vision at this time. My market is even larger as the 32nd largest city, and no dice. Unfortunately, with a deployment plan, there will be some early winners. Not everyone can be in the beginning. We can commiserate together. :(

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Robert, maybe I'll go with a WiMax phone when I upgrade in August and get an LTE phone in 2014. Even though Sprint doesn't officially have WiMax here there are some Clear towers with coverage at least where I work, I can roam on those right?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Robert, maybe I'll go with a WiMax phone when I upgrade in August and get an LTE phone in 2014. Even though Sprint doesn't officially have WiMax here there are some Clear towers with coverage at least where I work, I can roam on those right?.

 

Yes, you can use all Clearwire WiMax sites as native coverage until 2015. I too occasionally use WiMax protection sites here in New Mexico. I'm not certain when I'm going to upgrade yet, either.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea when Sacramento, CA is getting Lte. Sprintfeed is saying that Stockton is testing Lte.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Edited by Juned
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea when Sacramento, CA is getting Lte. Sprintfeed is saying that Stockton is testing Lte.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

The Upper Central Valley market is not in the first two rounds of Network Vision. SprintFeed is not even around any more, when did they say that? Also, I do not see any LTE FIT's in the Stockton area. By my information, planning and design is not yet completed in this market. They can't deploy anything without it being designed first.

 

It doesn't appear to me that anything is going on in Stockton at all. The closest activity I see to Stockton is in the SF Bay market. In the Brentwood and Altamont Pass areas. There will be some sites in those areas that are scheduled to begin work in July. However, there have been lots of delays in the SF Bay market deployment. So I don't even know if those dates are still good.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was tweeted my Mark today. Here is a linkhttp://www.technobuffalo.com/news/wireless/sprints-network-vision-4g-lte-additional-markets-revealed/

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was tweeted my Mark today. Here is a linkhttp://www.technobuf...rkets-revealed/

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

I have seen this slide. These are not markets. These are dates that 4G cores will be ready. Sprint is housing a 4G core in Stockton. I better get a hold of Mark.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have seen this slide. These are not markets. These are dates that 4G cores will be ready. Sprint is housing a 4G core in Stockton. I better get a hold of Mark.

 

Robert

4G core?

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Think switch, but for 4G LTE data.

 

Robert

 

Like the main switch building I noted in moorisivlle, nc long ago?...if so that's a big build out there as I thought they would of just upgraded it to run through same locations if possible...actually having to build out main switch centers is something I never thought of during this whole thing ..

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the main switch building I noted in moorisivlle, nc long ago?...if so that's a big build out there as I thought they would of just upgraded it to run through same locations if possible...actually having to build out main switch centers is something I never thought of during this whole thing ..

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

I'm not certain why they are separate from switches, but in most cases they are.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not certain why they are separate from switches, but in most cases they are.

 

Robert

 

Only guess is they those instances they don't have enough space to fit needed switches in those already built centers?...

 

I guess I just assumed if current switches couldn't be upgraded to handle the extra data on top of reg stuff then they'd add to the location...guess that's not possible at all places...

 

Tossing darts to see what sticks there. Lol

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only guess is they those instances they don't have enough space to fit needed switches in those already built centers?...

 

I guess I just assumed if current switches couldn't be upgraded to handle the extra data on top of reg stuff then they'd add to the location...guess that's not possible at all places...

 

Tossing darts to see what sticks there. Lol

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

Sounds good to me!

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sounds good to me!

 

Robert

 

Haha, very confident. Lol

 

To be clear here: 4G Node= 4G switch center correct.?

 

Like the big cdma switch centers that handle multiple towers and such...just LTE instead of cdma/evdo handling...

 

 

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, very confident. Lol

 

To be clear here: 4G Node= 4G switch center correct.?

 

Like the big cdma switch centers that handle multiple towers and such...just LTE instead of cdma/evdo handling...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

Based on the context of how I see them in the documents I have read, 4G LTE Cores and LTE DDC's are used synonymously and have always discussed with CDMA switch centers. I can also see through schematics that ALL 4G LTE data gets routed from the site, through backhaul to the 4G LTE Core that each site is assigned to and then gets distributed to the internet.

 

However, I don't have much more understanding about the LTE Cores than this. I will admit where my knowledge is short so I don't have someone come along and try to discredit me. However, I am picturing it exactly the way you are outlining above.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I've seen this officially published by Sprint. Sprint says here that their 4G LTE will average 6 to 8 Mbps on the down-link with peak speeds of 25Mbps

http://shop2.sprint.....html#tab_where

 

Also, note that Unlimited is continued to be emphasized. :)

 

In comparison:

VZW states: 5-12 Mbps for the download.

http://aboutus.veriz...Advantages.html

ATT states: 5-12 on their 4G LTE

http://www.att.com/g...fairs?pid=20879

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I've seen this officially published by Sprint. Sprint says here that their 4G LTE will average 6 to 8 Mbps on the down-link with peak speeds of 25Mbps

http://shop2.sprint.....html#tab_where

 

Also, note that Unlimited is continued to be emphasized. :)

 

In comparison:

VZW states: 5-12 Mbps for the download.

http://aboutus.veriz...Advantages.html

ATT states: 5-12 on their 4G LTE

http://www.att.com/g...fairs?pid=20879

 

Thanks Ben. Sounds very consistent to what I reported in this article: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-83-new-network-visionlte-deployment-details-and-central-jersey-market-work-is-under-way-with-several-sites-live/

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Based on the context of how I see them in the documents I have read, 4G LTE Cores and LTE DDC's are used synonymously and have always discussed with CDMA switch centers. I can also see through schematics that ALL 4G LTE data gets routed from the site, through backhaul to the 4G LTE Core that each site is assigned to and then gets distributed to the internet.

 

However, I don't have much more understanding about the LTE Cores than this. I will admit where my knowledge is short so I don't have someone come along and try to discredit me. However, I am picturing it exactly the way you are outlining above.

 

Robert

 

Well then we must be right then. Hehe

 

 

Least till AJ chimes in and drops bombs of knowledge. LOL

Seriously AJ you know too much. Jkjk

We need to organize a sponsors quiz of AJ's spectrum knowledge...I think he'd dominate 95% scoring easily! Lol

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea when Sacramento, CA is getting Lte. Sprintfeed is saying that Stockton is testing Lte.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

I have written a response article to the TechnoBuffalo piece: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-162-clarification-on-reported-new-sprint-4g-lte-cities/

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not certain why they are separate from switches' date=' but in most cases they are.

 

Robert[/quote']

 

Here's my educated guess:

 

Sprint is installing shiny new site equipment with new backhaul (microwave, fiber, or what have you). So they set up shiny new network "cores", or data centers, with all the network routers and such. Cutover is probably much simpler and less disruptive than trying to work with the legacy locations.

 

That's what I figger anyway.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...