Jump to content

HTC One max [Tri-Band] (was "HTC "Phablet" aka "T6"")


themuffinman

Recommended Posts

I won't do anything until I see the radio  performance.   I hope it will be better than the EVO LTE.  Of course it wouldn't take much.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it has LTE Band 26/41 support (800/2600), I would get it. That is, if it's the real McCoy.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me personally I am enjoying the One quite a bit but I wish the screen was slightly larger.  If this turns out to be true, I don't see how I won't buy it.  Hopefully it has comparable note 2/3 features or HTC will be wasting their time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 It had better have more than a 4.0 mp camera, did we go back to 2005?

It's a bit of a trade off, I do miss being able to zoom in quite a bit on my pictures, but the colors look amazing, especially when it's capturng whites, which tends to throw the color balance off a lot. Now an 8 mp with their Ultrapixel technology will honestly be the most amazing phone camera ever!

 

 

-Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 It had better have more than a 4.0 mp camera, did we go back to 2005?

 

In my opinion I think it has the best overall camera at least compared to the gs4 13mp camera.  Now the reality is the gs4 wins hands down in well lit areas but when it comes to medium to low light then its not even close.  When it comes to taking videos, I think the One beats the gs4 in every scenario not to mention the One has OIS which works surprisingly well. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 It had better have more than a 4.0 mp camera, did we go back to 2005?

 

You mean back to 2005 when you were five years old?

 

:P

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was 13 back in 05, my age is posted on my profile.

 

I know that.  I am being facetiously hyperbolic.  But you are showing your age -- or lack thereof -- by buying into smartphone camera specsmanship.

 

As a long time photographer and film major, I have more knowledge of photography in my little finger than most of you do altogether.  Current smartphone camera specs matter very little.  The cameras are good for casual shots, not much else.  And that is not going to change much with the typical smartphone form factor.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that.  I am being facetiously hyperbolic.  But you are showing your age -- or lack thereof -- by buying into smartphone camera specsmanship.

 

As a long time photographer and film major, I have more knowledge of photography in my little finger than most of you do altogether.  Current smartphone camera specs matter very little.  The cameras are good for casual shots, not much else.  And that is not going to change much with the typical smartphone form factor.

 

AJ

 

Yes master Jedi

 

 

* And on a more serious note i hope by early fall tri-band Lte devices have surfaced for Sprint.  And as for the HTC devices, if they have a contender; hopefully with a 5" or larger display i would definitely jump on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes master Jedi

 

You can call me AJ-Wan.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.phonedog.com/2013/05/30/htc-t6-rumored-to-feature-5-9-inch-1080p-display-quad-core-snapdragon-800-processor/

 

 

These rumoured specs are getting juicier and juicier, except for the 16gb part which had better not be true unless there is an sd card slot.

 

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16gb onboard only?

 

That seems pretty low, considering the HTC ONE came with minimum of 32gb.

 

 

-Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16gb onboard only?

 

That seems pretty low, considering the HTC ONE came with minimum of 32gb.

 

 

-Luis

 

Yeah I am hoping that part is wrong but if it has an sd slot then I really don't care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I am hoping that part is wrong but if it has an sd slot then I really don't care. 

maybe they might put on right under the SIM since the phone is bigger, if they don't they might find a way to justify it by blaming the Radios :P (and how everything American is bigger)

 

But for real, 16 is way too low, I'm happy with 32 since my tablet has 32 and I have everything there, I use a bit less of my phone.

 

 

-Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe they might put on right under the SIM since the phone is bigger, if they don't they might find a way to justify it by blaming the Radios :P (and how everything American is bigger)

 

But for real, 16 is way too low, I'm happy with 32 since my tablet has 32 and I have everything there, I use a bit less of my phone.

 

 

-Luis

Engadget is reporting that the phone is also rumoured to have an sd card slot.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Engadget is reporting that the phone is also rumoured to have an sd card slot.

When are we finally going to get a phone with a coin slot?

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCF8ZOYVXF8

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...