Jump to content

COUNTDOWN!!! Nextel iDEN Shutdown


Recommended Posts

Here is my quip

"All your Nextel are belong to us"

See if anyone recognizes that line....

 

Aybabtu.png

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was quick, nice AJ.

 

Maybe a better variation would be "All your 800 MHz are belong to us."

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

That was quick, nice AJ.

 

 

Maybe a better variation would be "All your 800 MHz are belong to us."

 

AJ

Ugh, that is better. Perfect actually, I wish I thought of that one. Hahaha.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one can say foy sure but in general 800 dies better inside and usally covers a bit further.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few of local towers in Granville, oh are 3g/800 nv accepted. I picked up 800 once.... Think they were testing it and shut off until after the iden shutdown?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what she said

 

Hey, if it is "outdoor penetration," it often has to be quick.

 

(See this thread:  http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4125-lte-coverage-more-like-a-road-line-not-a-blanket/)

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're removing most of them from its network: 68k towers to 39k towers. That's where much of the cost savings from NV is coming from: removing redundant towers. With Direct Connect on CDMA SMR 800 MHz, Sprint has no need for the Nextek towers. Also, Direct Connect will be available even while roaming on VZW albeit with possibly some additional latency in the call setup.

Also, you know they don't own any of those, right? They lease them.

I don't think Sprint outright owns any of its towers.

Someone else on forums said some of the Nextel lease agreements were really bad and that on many of the towers, Sprint was sole leasee. So, maybe once the site owner sees that they have an empty tower, they'll give Speint better lease rates and Sprint will come back to that tower.

 

I know most of the towers are leased as a rule, but I thought sprint still owned the old Qwest towers in Montana and the Dakotas, plus the odd ones here and there that they built themselves for some reason (maybe they there were no good options for leasing a tower in a particular area?). Did they sell those all off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sectime

IDEN rollin', rollin', rollin' down the river

IDergEN works better 

Tell um Charlie sent you

Edited by sectime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WiWavelength, on 30 Jun 2013 - 11:32 AM, said:snapback.png

 

enyce9, on 30 Jun 2013 - 11:30 AM, said:

 

That was quick, nice AJ.

 

Maybe a better variation would be "All your 800 MHz are belong to us."

 

AJ

 

Ugh, that is better. Perfect actually, I wish I thought of that one. Hahaha.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

Ugh, that is better. Perfect actually, I wish I thought of that one. Hahaha.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

All your base station are belong to us.

Your towers are on the way to destruction, make your time (division multiplex access).

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one can say foy sure but in general 800 dies better inside and usally covers a bit further.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

penetrates buildings better.  I can tell you That one tower buy my work I have a Verizon work phone.  Sprint an Verizon on same tower I keep loosing 4g and Verizon stays on it maybe 3 bars but not dropping it.  As for distance a little more not like miles more unless its a flat open valley maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

penetrates buildings better.  I can tell you That one tower buy my work I have a Verizon work phone.  Sprint an Verizon on same tower I keep loosing 4g...

 

You should not try to "penetrate" buildings.  They definitely are not "loose."

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think goes in with exactly what some of you were iDen phones were seeing where calls didn't work then later it was No Service on the display:

 

"The end of the network didn’t come with flip of a switch, but rather with the dispatch of software code, Sprint network chief Bob Azzi said Monday. Just after midnight local time in the U.S., an initial script was sent to stop calls from working on the network and then over a few hours another set of code turned off the actual radios at more than 20,000 remaining Nextel sites. That process rolled with the time zones every hour as the clock struck midnight."

 

Source:  http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/07/01/sprints-nextel-network-is-finally-no-more/

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think goes in with exactly what some of you were iDen phones were seeing where calls didn't work then later it was No Service on the display:

 

"The end of the network didn’t come with flip of a switch, but rather with the dispatch of software code, Sprint network chief Bob Azzi said Monday. Just after midnight local time in the U.S., an initial script was sent to stop calls from working on the network and then over a few hours another set of code turned off the actual radios at more than 20,000 remaining Nextel sites. That process rolled with the time zones every hour as the clock struck midnight."

 

Source:  http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/07/01/sprints-nextel-network-is-finally-no-more/

 

Interesting.  So this seems to imply that the radios were remotely shut off so that it would stop broadcasting the signal.  I know Sprint still needs to send folks out to turn off the power, remove T-1 backhaul and cabinets for the OPEX savings but if this means that CDMA 800 can be launched faster because the 800 MHz signal all over the US is no longer being broadcasted then this is good news.  I still think it will be a few weeks before we see a large acceptance of 800 CDMA sites but I am hope I am wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
    • Welcome back! That's similar to my best (1250ish). A few people have broken 2000 on good sites. 
    • Lots of new multi-carrier nodes popping up in Bushwick. Crown Castle Fiber node at Ridgewood & Palmetto:   Crown Castle Solutions node at Irving & Jefferson:   Crown Castle Solutions node at Wilson & Noll:  
    • I’m surprised they’re running a 5x5 Band 66 carrier still. In NYC T-Mobile has 25x25 AWS and they’re running 20x20 Band 66 and 5x5 n66 (in testing). Presumably when n66 commercially launches they’ll drop Band 66 down to 15x15 and go straight for a 10x10 n66 carrier like they did with n25. 
    • Austin has now narrowed B2 to 15x15 to support a second 10x10 n25 channel, this time entirely in PCS A-F. So T-Mobile now has 35x35 FD (n71 + n25) and 180 MHz TD (n41) NR live here, and LTE single carrier bandwidth now tops out at 15x15. LTE is down to 5x5 B12, 15x15 B2, 10x10+10x10+5x5 B66, so they now have 5 carriers each of LTE and NR, with 45x45 total LTE.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...